preview

Criminals Should Not Have Guns

Decent Essays

Convicted Criminals Should Not Own Guns First off, gun control is one of the most stunning and intriguing topics discussed in the United States today. Gun control should only be for criminals they should not take guns away from innocent people. Criminals should not be allowed to carry guns in public as protection because they may harm others, use it for illegal purposes, and with no federal law. Also, by citing this amendment the supreme court had upheld the right of states to govern firearms (Masters). In 2008, the decisions were confirmed that an individual right to keep and bear arms, had outlawed handguns and to lock them in their homes and for them to be disassembled in Washington, D.C. (Masters). The U.S. has the highest rate …show more content…

They also add that the system has holes in it (Volokh). Another problem is the laws of carrying guns vary enormously (Volokh). The case was basically about reading the criminal state and made sure that the criminal will not go to prison unless the government proves the requirements (Volokh). Gorsuch and his associates argued that the 10th circuit should have turned the decision that failed around earlier (Volokh). A felon can regain his gun rights under federal law if the state where he got convicted restores four things (Volokh). the first and second ones are his gun rights under state law & their right to vote (Volokh). The third and fourth ones are the felons right to serve on a jury & their right to hold office (Volokh). Lastly, no criminals should be allowed to carry guns as protection in public. Gun control should only apply to criminals who have used guns as a weapon. One reason that criminals should not be allowed is because they used it to harm another person. Also, a few others would be that they used it illegally or there is no federal law. Of course they have certain restrictions on felons or criminals who have used guns as to harm

Get Access