In the poem “Casey at Bat” and story “ David and Goliath,” a comparison of David and Casey shows differences and similarities. First, a similarity between Casey and David are they both filled with courage. In “Casey at Bat” it says “They thought, if only Casey could get but a whack at that We’d put up even money, now, with Casey at the bat.”In “The Story of David and Goliath” it expresses, “You’ve come out to fight me with a sword and a spear and a dagger. But I’ve come out to fight you in the name of the Lord All-Powerful.” Both of these stories show that both characters show courage in their situations, no matter what the situation is they both show courage. The next similarity is that they both characters have people depending on them. In “Casey at Bat” it states, “They saw his face grow stern and cold, they saw his muscles strain,and they …show more content…
The final similarity is that both characters are fighting someone, both figuratively and literally. In “The Story of David and Goliath” it declared “They’re with Saul’s army, fighting the Philistines in Elah Valley.” Also in “Casey at Bat” it states “Kill him! Kill the umpire!” So according to these two passages both characters are “fighting/killing” someone figuratively and literally. Now for the many differences between Casey and David, First difference is Casey and David’s situation. In “Casey at Bat” it says “We’d put up even money, now, with Casey at the bat,”which means that he was playing baseball and he was good at it. In “The Story of David and Goliath” it says that,”Today the Lord will help me defeat you. I’ll knock you down and cut off your head, and I’ll feed the bodies of the other Philistine soldiers to the birds and wild animals.” In this case David is fighting someone and is using GOD’s help to fight them. The second difference is the plot of the
In the poem “Casey at Bat” and story “David and Goliath,” a comparison of David and Casey shows differences and similarities. One of the similarities is that they both faced giants. David faced the literal giant Goliath. A verse in the Bible says “The Philistine army had a hero named Goliath who was from the town of Gath and was over nine feet tall.” Casey’s giant was him overcoming his ego. An example of this is, “There was pride in Casey’s bearing and a smile on Casey’s face.” Another similarity is that they had a goal in mind the entire time. David’s goal was to defeat Goliath and bring glory to God. On the other hand Casey’s goal was to win the baseball game. Some examples of this are, “You’ve come out to fight me with a sword and a spear
Part One of Malcolm Gladwell’s David and Goliath was a wonderful read that I connected to greatly, probably more so than the other sections. This segment dealt with our perception of advantages and disadvantages. This was due to the fact that Gladwell used stories that I related to more and found most interesting as a whole. I especially loved Chapter Three’s subject dealing with a student by the name of Caroline Sacks and her choice between going to a large university versus going to a small one because it was a conflict that I myself had. I have since been very happy with my choice to go with a smaller school and was surprised to see how many statistics supported the idea. As someone who loves studying history, one of my favorite ways Gladwell structures his narrative is when he uses historical events to make his very personal points. He begins the Caroline Sacks chapter with an anecdote about the French Impressionists and how they decided that it was “better to be a Big Fish in a Little Pond that a Little Fish in a Big Pond” (Gladwell 74). This, of course, ties into Caroline Sacks’ decision,
In the passages, “Casey at the Bat” and “David and Goliath” David and Casey show a lot of similarities and differences. One similarity is that they both had to face many conflicts. The poem, “Casey at the Bat”, states, “‘That ain’t my style,’ said Casey. ‘Strike one,’ the umpire said.” The passage “David and Goliath” states, “When Goliath saw that David was just a healthy, good-looking boy, he made fun of him.” Casey was continuing to strike out and causing his team to lose and Goliath was way bigger than David. These are both problems Casey and David had to face. Another similarity is that they both have tons of pressure on them. “Casey at the Bat” states, “Five thousand tongues applauded when he wiped them on his shirt.” “David and
The second similarity is that they both have a chance at winning the game or war. In “Casey at Bat” it says “They thought, if only Casey could get but a whack at that - - We’d put up even money, now, with Casey at the bat” and in “David and Goliath” it says “The Lord has rescued me from the claws of lions and bears, and he will keep me safe from the hands of this Philistine.“All right,” Saul answered, “go ahead and fight him. And I hope the Lord will help you”. In “Casey at Bat” the quote I sayed shows that Casey’s team has a chance because Casey might hit the ball. In “David and Goliath” the quote that shows how they have a chance by David saying he can beat him and Saul believed him so there was chance. The third similarity is that they both were cocky in a certain period. In “David and Goliath” it says ““Your Majesty,” he said, “this Philistine
According to Malcolm Gladwell chapter two of “David and Goliaths” economist Caroline Hoxby found that there was not any significant data indicating smaller classroom sizes had a greater effect on a child’s academic achievement. However; Diana Whitmore Schanzenbach from National Education Policy Center (NEPC), Northwestern University has contradicted Gladwell’s assertion that smaller classroom sizes were not an academic advantage. Schanzenbach review research done by Tennessee’s Student Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR) and found many flaws that had been considered in Hoxby research that conflicted with much of the research that has already been concluded. There has been a considerable amount of research and much of it has concluded with: the children who were placed in a classroom with less students from kindergarten to third grade, scored higher during academic testing, and were more likely to continue to achieve higher grades throughout their school years. Because education is an important stepping stone for children, it is crucial their educational needs are exceeded while they are young and still able to grasp.
Both stories suggest on a personal level that the mind is uncharted and difficult to understand. We see Claire working at self-discovery. David too has to navigate through his emotions; his grief to find some middle ground with Claire.
Throughout the Chrysalids we see David's heroic attributes. By taking risks to save others and never thinking about how a decision may affect him. In the first few chapters we see David's first act of heroism by the way he protects the less fortunate Sophie from the demanding Alan. David takes the risk of seeing Sophie on a daily basis but making sure to never tell a soul of her minute deviation. When
The content of the book “David and Goliath” written by Malcolm Gladwell is quite similar with the article that I was assigned to read which entitled The Pedagogy of the Oppressed. The main focus of both stories is to explain more on the oppression, suffered by people all over the world in all eras. The book began with a story on how the author relates the title “David and Goliath” with overall content of the book. At first, I wonder and question on the title given by the author. The word “Goliath” seems a myth to me, so my impression on it was not quite good. Usually, any mythology stories were all written in an English language that I could never understand. My guess was right on the myth but I was shocked to see that the words were put in
While that is true, this difference is also a similarity. The reason Joseph and David are such important characters and why they are so strongly against each other is because they both think they are doing the right thing and are stubborn about it. Readers might see Joseph and the bad guy, being against mutations and beating his son for hiding one, but he was brought up this way, hating mutations and thinking the worst of them. He thinks he is doing the right thing and following God's will by getting rid of, what he deems, the devil. David is technically doing the same thing. He's doing what he thinks is right, and although they may not see eye to eye, they are both doing what they think is
Being disadvantaged at birth is rather painful and should be avoided at all costs. However, as humans, we have evolved over the years to adapt to both internal and external environment. For example, David and Goliath, a non- fiction book that represents the fight between the underdog and giant and advantage vs. drawback, shows that those who are outnumbered can manipulate his or her surroundings in favor with strategy. Vice versa, those who are deemed advantageous are more susceptible to becoming arrogant and cocky. Thus, advantage is relative to the environment and the people within.
The Importance of family and cultural values is proved in the Greek playwright written by Sophocles. Sophocles helped us understand each character as we meet them in the first scene. Antigone, we learn that she is the antagonist as she rebels against her uncle, Creon, and her love of her own blood, and that she is not one to stand down for any man. Antigone, Ismene and Creon are characters that are of discussion in the play of gender roles.
David is holding Goliath’s head in his left hand, and the sword in his right. His face has a nonchalant expression on it while he is holding the head as if he is not impressed or phased by his decapitated head. There is more variety with David’s human-like face and Goliath’s green and bleeding face. There is unity in the similar color scheme, but the visual elements are varied in order to achieve intricate and complex relationships in it. The piece is asymmetrical with david taking a large portion of the left side, however there is
In the story David and Goliath there is a great lesson to be learned. The story shows that you should never underestimate your opponent and be prepared for anything. David’s own intellect and knowledge of his own abilities enabled him to become the smaller, but stronger opponent. It all comes down to who is the better leader.
Both Saul and David were men of war. Each led armies against the enemies of Israel. They were both politically perceptive and operated prophetically. The difference between these two
In the poem “Casey at Bat” and story “David and Goliath,” a comparison of David and Casey shows differences and similarities. The first similarity That David and Casey share is that they are both confident. For example, in ” Casey at the bat” it says “There was ease in Casey’s manner as he stepped into his place;”. This means that casey was confident that he would get a hit because he step up to the plate simple and calm. However