Rogers Telecom’s definition of corporate social responsibility is similar to the ISO 26000 in addressing the seven principle subjects, organizational governance, human rights, labour practices, the environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, and community involvement and development. Although, not all issues belonging to these principles were addressed. The strongest attributes of the Rogers CSR definition supported by their 2013 CSR report are organizational governance, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement and development, and the environment. The weaker attributes of the Rogers CSR definition supported by their 2013 CSR report are human rights and labour practices. Organizational governance and fair operating practices were evident in both Rogers Telecom’s CSR definition and report as they were frequently mentioned as an important factor in all business activities. Specifically, Rogers addressed two issues under the fair operating practices principle, anti-corruption and fair competition. Rogers approach in addressing the issue of anti-corruption is to adhere to the Rogers Business Conduct Guidelines, guidelines that define the expected behaviour from all employees in standards of business conduct, integrity and ethical behaviour. In addition, Rogers Board of Directors must also comply with these guidelines as well as a separate, Directors Code of Conduct and Ethics. Furthermore, Roger’s combats anti-corruption with their whistle
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) is a term describing a company’s obligation to be accountable to all of its stakeholder in all its operation and activities. Socially responsible companies consider the full scope of their impact on communities and the environment when making decisions, balancing the needs of stakeholder with their need to make profit.
Social responsibility should be important to businesses because it shows consumers and the media that the company takes a serious interest in doing what is right. These issues may be spread locally, nationally, or globally and could impact the health and wellness of customers and employees. Implementing a good social responsibility policy can impact buying decisions for consumers wanting to make purchases from an ethical company. Building a trustworthy reputation takes time, and effort, and is a valuable attribute for a business to have.
Introduction Letter from the CEO Hierarchy of Company Ethics Principles Our Purpose Our Values Our Principles Our Policies A. Respect of Government and the Law 1. Compliance With Legal Requirements 2. Accuracy of Company Books and Records • Books and Records • Disclosure Controls • Internal Controls 3. Securities Trading 4. Antitrust Policy and Compliance Guidelines 5. Lobbying 6. Political Contributions and Related Policies 7. Transacting International Business B. Respect in the Workplace 1. Behavior in the Workplace 2. Child Labor and Worker Exploitation 3. Wage and Hour Practices 4. Safety, Health and Environmental • Employee
Introduction Letter from the CEO Hierarchy of Company Ethics Principles Our Purpose Our Values Our Principles Our Policies A. Respect of Government and the Law 1. Compliance With Legal Requirements 2. Accuracy of Company Books and Records • Books and Records • Disclosure Controls • Internal Controls 3. Securities Trading 4. Antitrust Policy and Compliance Guidelines 5. Lobbying 6. Political Contributions and Related Policies 7. Transacting International Business B. Respect in the Workplace 1. Behavior in the Workplace 2. Child Labor and Worker Exploitation 3. Wage and Hour Practices 4. Safety, Health and Environmental •
Although corporate social responsibility has no universal definition, it is understood to be the way firms integrate social, environmental and economic concerns into their values, culture, decision making, strategy and operations in a transparent and accountable manner and thereby establish better practices within the firm, create wealth and improve society. (Industry Canada, 2011) This report will represent the critical analysis of the current Corporate Social Responsibility practices of Air Canada followed by recommendations for improvement.
This essay will evaluate the relationship between Corporate Strategy, Corporate Social Responsibility and will give some examples in order to give an idea to companies why they should engage in CSR and the consequences of engaging on it. It has been told that engaging on Corporate Social Responsibility is a cost, but recently has been demonstrated that if it is well managed the money that you put on CSR implementation can be taken into account as an investment. Companies engage in CSR not only because moral questions, it has been demonstrated that CSR is a door to an increase in the reputation of the company. In the long term companies realize that customers really appreciate the engagement of the company to social or environmental activities. Managers nowadays realize on how the consumers mind are changing towards a more responsible consumption and how these consumers look for information on how the products they consume have been produced. So these managers in order to increase in a long term base the good reputation of the company are investing nowadays on changing their strategy and trying all the company to engage in responsible practices. As explained in more detail in this paper the consequences of engaging in CSR are worth more than the cost of changing the company’ strategy. Some of them are the increase of consumer loyalty, investor attractiveness, political stability and economic benefits.
As the interest in corporate social responsibility has had the ability to keep increasing and developing and the force that is gain by movement, scholars and practitioners have put effort to follow the progress, development and information of companies’ performance to accomplish their corporate social responsibilities, characteristically to use a particular name corporate social performance (CSP) to describe it. Such corporate social performance shows people and stakeholders things that important about firms’ products, services and the processes of producing the products. It now is accepted by a great many people and in many markets, especially spread all over particular areas such as “environmental impact, social impact, employee relations, and corporate governance” (Kristoffersen, Gerrans and Clark-murphy 2008, 46). Phillip Morris International is an American multinational cigarette and tobacco enterprise, and it is a world’s most important and most successful international tobacco enterprise. It has six international brands within world’s top 15, and its products are available in more than 180 countries (Pim.com). The Philip Morris international company operates not only making cigarettes but also about the style of doing industry and commerce, and the way of having effects on the exterior of its offices, both domestically and internationally. The Philip Morris International aims to maintain both high domestic and international standards of being a socially responsible
When looking at a company’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the tie in to consumer confidence, the apparel industry illustrates both the best and the worst cases. Today’s consumers are more aware of how multinational corporations are incorporating or failing to incorporate CSR practices throughout the product lifecycle. This awareness has pushed companies in the apparel industry like Nike and Gap to evaluate current practices and incorporate socially responsible and environmentally responsible policies throughout their supply chain.
Different scholars and professors have defined CSR or Corporate Social Responsibility in many ways. Generally, CSR includes the responsibilities that businesses hold towards the societies they carry their operations in (Cadbury, 2006). The European Commission defines CSR as “a concept whereby companies decide voluntarily to contribute to a better society and a cleaner environment.” A more specific definition of CSR explains that businesses must identify their stakeholder groups and understand their needs and values and take those values into their operational and strategic decision making process (Cadbury, 2006).
Supply Chain Responsibility is or at least should be part of a company’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) strategy. CSR is a strategy that managers use to monitor, maintain, and often times improve the environmental and social impacts of their companies as well as how they interact with all of their stakeholders not just the shareholders for which their operations effect. Managers should use their CSR plains to balance the expectations of their often competing stakeholders with their environmental, social, and economic goals. Some fundamental CSR concerns are stakeholder engagement, environmental impact, responsible sourcing of raw materials, standards and working condition of the labor force, social and gender equity as well as good governance and anti-corruption control. CSR approaches focus on what is called a Triple Bottom Line for measurable results. The three measures are profit which is the economic value that a company creates, social which is the how the company treats its labor force and the communities for which it operates in and environmental which is how the company is engaged in the creation and application of sustainable practices that produce reductions or eliminates environmental impacts.
Corporate initiative to assess and take responsibility for the company 's effects on the environment and impact on social welfare. The term generally applies to company efforts that go beyond what may be required by regulators or environmental protection groups.
Social obligation is a thought that has been of worry to humankind for a long time. In the course of the most recent two decades, be that as it may, it has happened to expanding worry to the business world. This has brought about developing communication between governments, organizations and society all in all. Previously, organizations basically fretted about the financial consequences of their choices. "Today, notwithstanding, organizations should likewise think about the legitimate, moral, good and social results of their choices" (Anderson 15). This paper will talk about the idea of corporate social obligation. It will examine the significance of partnerships setting up corporate social obligation ventures, and the effect these have on society.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has the negative connotation of “putting in extra effort to make a difference”. However… when large companies such as Pick and Pay makes it their responsibility to give back to the community it has the ability to change the lives of everyday, struggling South Africans. CSR can be defined as management’s obligation to promote and protect the welfare of all stakeholders. (1) It is clear that Pick and Pay has chosen to make a difference in the community and support their stakeholders.
As we all know, corporate social responsibility is a discipline in business practices. This is one of the business practice sector that is most demanding and constantly changing sector in business enterprise. Because of these demanding tasks that corporate social responsibility has posed on business, business leaders or stakeholders has been faced with the responsibility of bringing a favorable environment for business activities. The prospect of corporate social responsibility became famous in the 1960s. Many companies have used this term in an unlawful manner to benefit the business responsibility rather than overall business welfare, which it is meant for (Ferrell 2014, pp. 3-17).