preview

Demonising Men Won T Stop Domestic Violence Summary

Decent Essays

After 31 deaths recorded over the previous year, the legislature has enacted $572 million towards the issue of domestic violence. The daily Telegraph opinion piece, entitled 'demonising men won't stop domestic violence', distributed by Miranda Devine on the 27th of September infers a blunt and ridiculing tone. The author attempts to prove to the intended interest group - the stakeholders and readers of the daily Telegraph - that placing money on this issue will not stop abusive behaviour at home, but in order to alleviate the problem of family abuse, the reliance on welfare - in the lower class of society - should stop.

With reference to generalizations, this manipulates the reader to feel as if it is common sense to agree with her. She addresses the topic that the use of alcohol and drug abuse is the main cause of home violence as well as ‘poverty’. This influences the readers to respond in a way of questioning her viewpoint, but also becoming more engaged with what she has to say. A contradictory point of view is established by Devine when she uses Batty’s son’s story as an anecdote. With this, she was able to pull in sympathy and curiosity of the reader's - however, she mentions that the little boy’s father was ‘mentally ill’ and took ‘drugs’. By doing this, she was able to shake …show more content…

When Devine argues that the disadvantaged is in charge, she uses generalizations, anecdotes, inclusive language, attacks, emotive language, repetition, rhetorical questions and evidence to reinforce the problem. She was able to emphasize the seriousness of the issue by confronting the audience and convincing the reader to feel sympathy and disagree with what the opposition has to say. The article ends up being exceptionally successful as the audience was able to consider her opinion and reasons for domestic

Get Access