Direct Popular Vote Analysis

efficiently if the system was replaced with a system that allowed the president to be elected by a direct popular vote. The only way to accomplish this completely would be to pass an Amendment. The Electoral College is the current system for electing the next president and the process is as follows: a direct popular vote is conducted in each state – each of which has a fixed amount of Electoral votes based on the population of the state – and then the winner is determined by a simple majority of

Student ID: 930898839 Would a direct popular election correct the disenfranchisement of voters caused by the modern Electoral College? Of the 11,539 constitutional amendments proposed in the last 227 years, only 27 went on to alter our nation’s most fixed document, the Constitution of the United States (Senate 2013). Our Founding Fathers purposefully installed this resistance to change in order to prevent rash, semi-permanent decisions, which could cause cataclysmic effects on the country. Yet one

their state by forms of a direct democratic vote by the state’s citizens. When electing the President, it is more complex; there are two major factors involved, The Electoral College and popular vote. It is possible for most Americans to vote for a candidate, but that candidate can still lose the election as it has happened in multiple occasions; the only way to prevent this undemocratic act is to base elections on the country’s national popular vote, the people’s vote. The Electoral College is intended

Only eligible citizens can vote. Which are comprised of naturalized citizens and U.S born citizens. Undocumented people living in the U.S are ineligible to vote for any election. This is a flaw in American democracy because it is preventing people who live in American soil from voting on the basis of documentation status. Even among Americans who are eligible to vote, there are barriers to prevent certain groups from taking part in the democratic

This resulted because some delegates supported a direct election by citizens while others favored having Congress choose the president. Still others thought that state legislatures should make the choice. Originally, each state would choose electors equal in number to its representatives and senators. The electors would vote for two candidates each, at least one of whom had to be from another state. The person that would end up receiving the most votes would become President; the runner-up became the

Should the Electoral College be abolished? “The Electoral College in the US is a body of people representing the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the election of the president and the vice president.” The Electoral College has been the system of voting in the US since 1787, but with the growing and changing of our country, it has been a very controversial topic whether or not to keep the system in place. On five separate occasions in the history of our country, the Electoral College

The SMP system requires the winning candidate to have the highest number of votes in each constituency, thus this system does not require an absolute majority and candidates can win their seats with less than 50% of the votes (Press,T.C., 2015). The SMP system has a significant amount of flaws that are inherent within its’ structure. More specifically, this can be seen when analyzing a party’s share of votes in comparison with the share of seats they win, and how the best candidate may not

Introduction Essay #10 signed by Publius, who is assumed to be James Madison, is the argument for having factions, or interest groups, in politics. Essay # 10 is the tenth Federalist Papers, which aimed at convincing the ratification of the new United States Constitution. The former constitution was the Articles of Confederation, which failed miserably. In the Articles of Confederation, each state retained their own sovereignty and ability to make laws. The states had more power than the national

In order to properly understand the analysis of Stephen Tierney on the brexit Referendum and how democratic it was, one must first fully understand the concept of democracy. In other words, what is democracy? Is democracy a fallacy? Democracy may be a word familiar to most, but it is a concept still misunderstood and misused in a time when totalitarian regimes and military dictatorships alike have attempted to claim popular support by pinning democratic labels upon themselves. Yet the power of the

very different just in the course of 12 years. Although a lot has changed there are some major things that have dramatically changed just from election to election such as, campaign strategy and spending, “battleground states” or states which could vote for either candidate, the