Porter's Diamond Model Essay

1. High pressure for local adaptation combined with low pressure for lower costs would suggest what type of international strategy: A. global B. multidomestic C. transnational D. overall cost leadership 2. Foreign direct investment includes the following form of entry strategy: A. licensing B. franchising C. joint ventures D. exporting 3. According to Michael Porter, firms that have experienced intense domestic competition are A. unlikely to have the time or resources to compete abroad. B. most likely to design strategies aimed primarily at the domestic market. C. more likely to design strategies and structures that allow them to successfully compete abroad. D. more likely to demand protection from their governments.

In addition, the internationalisation is the strategy to occupy the foreign market step by step. Also, the porter’s competitive advantages theory is to analysis the strategies of global business. They could divide to three strategies: over cost leading, diversity, and market focus strategy (Passemard& Calantone, 2000). The cost leading strategy focus on establish efficient scale production facility and minimize the research and advertising cost. The diversity strategy focus on introduce some unique product in whole industry. But, this strategy will with a high cost price. The focus strategy is attack of a particular customer group or specialist regional market, its purpose to design the service for a particular target. Consequently, the companies need to consider the internal and external factor condition, such as: factor condition, demand condition, related and supporting industries condition, and firm strategy and rivalry. They are called diamond system. This dynamic system gives the company a standard to measure theirs advantage and disadvantage before they enter foreign market. Moreover, the specific advantage in Internationalisation of Production is give companies a new choose for exhausted market (Strange,S. 1992). In an international environment, the companies will face more uncertain and unequal condition than home market, therefore the companies need keep the attention of more factors:

(2012). Chapter 7: International Strategy. In G. G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin, A. B. Eisner, & G. McNamara, Strategic Management (pp. 257, 259-260). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Porter’s model aims to enable managers not only to understand their industry environment but also to shape their firm’s strategy. The five competitive forces are threat of entry, power of suppliers, power of buyers, threat of substitutes, and rivalry among existing competitors. “As a rule of thumb, the stronger the five forces, the lower the industry’s profit potential- making the industry less attractive to competitors. The weaker the five forces, the greater the industry’s profit potential – making the industry more attractive” (Rothaermel, 2013, p. 65). It is recommended that managers position their company in an industry in such a way that relaxes the constraints of strong forces and

But Firstly, we will start this part by talking about the importance of a deep analysis of the industry’s structure. A deep knowledge of the industry the company is in, is extremely important. The industry structure is unique and varies from industry to industry of course. It will determine the level of competitiveness and attraction of the industry. With the Five Forces model (Porter) and PESTEL (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal) analysis, the organization will get a better understanding of the market will allow you to know the requirements for the possible creation of sustainable competitive advantages and take the right strategic decisions. According to Porter, to create an efficient competitive strategy, it is important to understand the rules of competition that determine market attractiveness.

This proves difficult, however, when the outputs of so many industries serve as the inputs of other industries; therefore the failure of a single industry to achieve its target output causes a string of failed industries. For example, if iron mines did not produce enough iron ore for the steel industry, the steel mills would not be able to produce enough steel for all products that require steel (automobiles, machinery, etc.) and all businesses with inputs or outputs having anything to do with steel would collapse. This coordination problem is prone to worsen as the economy expands; in an enormous war-industry-based economic system such as that of Oceania, the economy would undoubtedly fail and power would be lost. The greater the economy, the more sophisticated the products and production techniques and the greater the number of industries requiring planning, and the central planners prove inadequate for large (and therefore powerful) economies. In order to manage, producers suppress product

J., & Ghauri, P. N. (2015). International business strategy: theory and practice. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Hill, C. (2011). International business, competing in the global marketplace. (8 ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

“Porter’s five forces”: Introduction. “Porter’s five forces” is widely applied in today’s business world. Harvard Professor Michael E. Porter’s first HBR article “How competitive forces shape strategy” was published in 1979. It became revolutionary in the field of strategy. Porter’s subsequent work has brought big changes to the study of competitive strategy for corporations, regions, and nations. With assistance from his colleagues from Harvard Business School, Porter continues to update and extend his classic work, providing practical guidance for

In the article “The Competitive Advantage of Nations” Michael Porter describes a diamond shaped relationship of forces that define a country’s potential for being competitive in a specified industry. The four points on the diamond representing the different forces are: factor conditions; demand conditions; firm strategy, structure and rivalry; and related and supporting industries. According to Porter, the four points apply pressure to each other resulting in a national

ASSESSING THE POWER OF PORTER'S DIAMOND MODEL IN THE AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY IN MEXICO AFTER TEN YEARS OF NAFTA

Business Strategy approach: - this is based on the idea of Pragmatism (Welford and Prescott, 1994) with the company making trade-offs between a number of unstable decision to internationalize and the way it adopts to do so Reid (1983) argues that foreign expansion is contingency based and

The same critics that Zahra has addressed to Oviatt and McDougall’s analysis applies on his list of factors contributing to the INV’s competitive advantage. We should acknowledge that every country has some economic or cultural specificity; therefore there are some universal business rules which apply on the entire global market. The traditional firms, who possesses years of local market experience, ownership and abundance of their resources are more qualified to compete on the international level.

Any country should use porter diamond theory of national advantage. It's designed to help understand the competitive advantage nations. It suggests that the national home base of any organizations are playing a supportive role in shaping the size or scoop to which it is likely to achieve advantage on a global scale. This home base provides basic factors, which support organizations from building advantages in international competition. Porter classifies four determinants: Factor Condition, Diamond Condition, Relatives & supporting and Structure, strategy & Rivalry. Egypt government acts to catalysts to improve Egypt position in a globally competitive economic environment. They found that they can create new factors such as skilled labor and high technology (Porter M., 1990). Porter's diamond model suggests threat there are inherent reasons why some nations are more competitive than others on an international market. Another factor that influence in competitive advantages such as the policies that put by government. One of the most influencer policies is (FDI) Foreign direct investment

•Firm strategy, structure, and rivalry --the conditions in the nation governing how companies are created,