Having a dog park in my neighborhood would not only improve the value of the property, it would improve the quality of life for all who use them. I live in an area where the majority of people who live there are pet owners. So the idea of building a dog park will most likely be favorable amongst them. There are more positive reasons to build a dog park than there are negative.
Exercise is important for all dogs. Just as humans need exercise to keep the blood flowing in their bodies, so do dogs. If we as humans don't exercise or move around to keep the blood flowing, the consequences are life threatening. Why would a dog be any different. If we have a place to let our dogs run free our dogs will not only be more healthy but also
According to one article '' That 37% of americans who own dogs often look for a dog park when choosing for a place to live''. With dog parks everyone would benefit. Without a place to take dogs they may never socialize much and can become aggresive.Though a good point can be made that dog parks can be loud at times. I still believe that dog parks are needed.
Before you jump to the hasty conclusion that I’m opposed to a dog park because I do not have a dog, let me assure you I do have a dog and am aware of my responsibilities as an owner. The principal argument for a dog park is “exercise is important to dogs’ mental and physical health.” I would take this argument a step further and state exercise is also
The Dog Town Skate Team exemplifies Houston’s stance that California is both a “place and a state of mind”. Houston details California’s bountiful- indeed, seemingly endless reserve of natural resources- its “loamy soil”, “grazing land for cattle”, gold, and the oil reserves that enriched 1920s Long Beach as well as many other locales- that have both supported native peoples and drawn immigrants to California while subtly developing a similarly golden perspective or outlook within the people. California’s rich biodiversity and vast natural resources morphed within its occupants’ beings into a similarly rich mindset, holding as early as the 16th century that within California- the Amazonian paradise described in Garci Ordonez de Montalvo’s novel,
Third, building a dog park in Muscatine would raise the property values in their communities. People who live in a apartment that does not have a back yard or somewhere a dog can run freely they could take them to the dog park. The dog and its owner is happy and always have a safe fun place to go. In addition the owner wouldn't have to worry about there dog getting hit by cars, running out in the middle of the street, and injuring people.
To many complications will come from a dog park. Such as situations like a dog attacking another dog or even attacking someone else. This can cause a lot of upset owners. Also many painful court cases. Dog parks will bring up a lot of legal issues that we don't need.
Public dog parks have proven to improve the health of the animals, decrease dog-related attacks, and increase the population in the surrounding area of the dog park. While concerns over the comfort of the surrounding residents comes into question, many of those issues may be resolved with appropriate laws set into place. For these reasons, I believe builing a public dog park would be a positive addition to the
I believe that we as a state should we deside if that's a good idea or not. I think this way becuase there are many perspectives that you have to take in. You have to know how many people are in you town. You also have to know if you have enough space for a dog park.
I believe most if not all cities should have a public dog park. Since I was nine years old I have always owned a dog. I have lived the city all of my life as well. Living in the city there is many apartment buildings with little to no yard space. To keep a healthy and friendly dog the dog needs exercise and play dates. Because most pet owners in the city have no yard space for these activities. a public dog park is the perfect solution.
By having a dog park in the area the property value will raise. Many people who have dogs look for property that has a dog park near their house or apartment. As a dog owner I am willing to pay top dollar for a place to live that is near a dog park so my dog will happy and healthy and I know other dog oweners are willing to as well, in fact 37% of americans who are dog owners look for a dog park when choosing a place to live. I read an artical that having such things as dog parks and other desirable things in neighborhoods can help boost the econemy and bring in more revenue to the city therfore even though it can be coastly up front it benifits
I fully support the idea of building a dog park. As many cities have leash laws which keep the dogs from getting the excersize and socialization they need. When a dog does not get the space and socialization it needs, its behavior can waver. Dogs can become agressive as stated in the passage, "A Dog Park Benefits All". Therefore getting a dog park would keep dog related injuries on the lower end of the spectrum.
In a residential area, there typically isnt much room for activity. Crowded living spaces and not much greenary. If you're a dog owner, you would think you would go ahead and knock places like that off of your house hunting list. Dogs do need space to run and play, but building a dog park in a smaller area doesn't seem too ideal.
Well, here we have two differentes points of view, the first one expones very good arguments about it, and the second mmm.... it seems only like a personal opinion, not strong enough, obviosly one loves dogs and the other one does not. Lets go and check this.
The issue reguarding whether there should be a dog park in any city can be reasonably argued both ways. Some people say that the dog park would raise the noise level and disturb people's sleep, and this could be reasonable, except that in a city there are a lot more louder noises to worry about than a dog barking. Also, nobody I know is going to take their dog to the park at night time. Whether or not the dogs in your local city are feral or not seems a lot more important than keeping the noise down. Especially if dogs will be walking down the street instead of at a dog park, and there are always dogs in the city. This is supported by the dramatic decrease of dog bites reported anually in New York (40,000 to 4,000)after they could be a
Would you rather have a dog park, or be the victim of a dog-bite? I would perfer to have a dog park for safety. Some dogs have a temper like us adults and can act up at times. Because it's our city ordinance for dogs to be off-leash in public areas, a park is needed. Personally I believe that, exercise is important to dogs because of it's mental and physical health, socializing, and bad behavior caused by dogs.To begin with,exercise is important to dogs because dogs can act out by barking and destroying things at home. If a dog isn't getting enough exercise it can become very cruel. A dog can obtain mental and physical health problems. With that being said our neighborhood need a dog park.
I think that it is a great idea to build a dog park because just like that passage stated exercise is important to a dog's mental and physical health lack of exercise can also cause alot of health problems for dogs from the lack of being able to walk around for example dog obesity lack of fresh air and freedom also leads to dogs barking and destroying things in their owners home. another reason why a dog bark is a excellent idea because dogs need to socialize with other dogs and other humans beings because in some cases dogs will attack other humans and other animals from the lack of not knowing them. I think dog biting accidents would stop if dogs were giving the proper tools to release some energy and frustration. a dog park is also a