I feel very strongly about the opinions expressed in both these articles.My opinion on the subject matter is that i disagree with the opinion that dogs"shouldn't"have a park to exercise,as stated in paragraph 5;"37% of americans who own dogs often look for a dog park when choosing where to live."Which in my opinion will help with the financial part of purchasing the park for the dogs. As stated in paragraph 2,"excercise is very important to the mental and physical health of dogs."In my past experience with dogs and their behaviors,they tend to lash out at times if they are kept in a certain vicinty for a long period of time. As stated in paragraph 2,"According to the ASPCA dogs that don't get exercise can act out by barking and destroying
I think dog parks are a good idea. Dogs need alot of exercise and play time. Many cites and urban areas just dont have the room for that to happen. But there are optoins there many open unused lots, and empty building that could be torn down to create these places. I am a dog owner myself i live in the country were open space is abundant. My dog Neno can run a play all he wants it's good for his health and mental state. When he doesn't get out he gets cranky and chews thing around the house. I grew up in a city of five millon, so i know how hepful a dog park can be to dog owners. You should always have your dog around other people, and animals,
This first statement is followed by the opinion that it would be a lawsuit waiting to happen and a burden on taxpayers. In the second paragraph the author starts off by stating that some cities require dog owners to obtain a permit in order to allow their dogs off-leash in a dog park. The author provides no citation for their data and it sounds like a false statement. They then go on to explain that most cities rely on people respecting the park rules but the rules are often not heeded. Once again; the author provides no citation, proof, or data to back up their statement. They then explain that if a dog is off leash in a park and acts out violently and bites a person or another dog then the victim can rightfully sue the owner of the dog and the city as well. Once again: no data to support the statement. In the thrid paragraph the author finally starts providing data to support their cause. The explain that an average dog barks at about 75 decibels and large breeds at 100. They then state that noise levels around dog parks have caused issues in cities in Virginia and Arizona. In the fourth paragraph the author states that taxpayers should not have to fund a project such as a dog park because the fence alone will cost $70,000. They then state that dog owners should not be able to pressure the city to build a dog park just so they can excercise their pets. They then state that they own a cat but they don't pressure the city to build a catnip garden. They leave off with a statement saying that people's pets are their own responsibility and not that of the community. They also state that if dog owners want a park then they sould build it themselves, with their own money, far out of
Behaviour –they can develop behaviours that seem unusual or out of character. These include agitation, calling out, repeating the same question, disturbed sleep patterns or reacting aggressively.
Before you jump to the hasty conclusion that I’m opposed to a dog park because I do not have a dog, let me assure you I do have a dog and am aware of my responsibilities as an owner. The principal argument for a dog park is “exercise is important to dogs’ mental and physical health.” I would take this argument a step further and state exercise is also
I would certainly agree that a dog park is a beneficial addition to a community in which many residents own dogs. The particular benefits that such a public service offers should not, in my opinion, be dismissed.
According to one article '' That 37% of americans who own dogs often look for a dog park when choosing for a place to live''. With dog parks everyone would benefit. Without a place to take dogs they may never socialize much and can become aggresive.Though a good point can be made that dog parks can be loud at times. I still believe that dog parks are needed.
To what extent is owning a dog beneficial for a person’s physical and psychological health? ________________________________________
If you drag out training sessions to the point that your dog is getting tired or frustrated, then you
The need Muscatine, Iowa has for a dog park is a difficult topic. Dog owners have lamented over the fact that there is no safe and legal area for them to allow their dogs to exercise in. In oppistion non-dog owners feel that the construction of a dog park would hamper their ability to peacefully live their life. Whilst there are difficulties to building a dog park for the community, I believe the pros out weigh the cons.
Both passages have valid points,But here's how I see it I feel that a dog park would be A good place for A community because. Dogs need sometime out of the day to play and run around and exercise. And A tiny private yard Isn't enough for a Dog at all dog parks provide the freedom to your dog to run around and play and exercise. And A dog park would also benefeit the dog owner by letting your dog go out and exercise and play, and training there dog it will become more obidient. And training your dog will help when say for instince your trying to go to sleep because you have to work in the morning and you your dog to be quiet with training it'll take one command and the dog will sit and be quiet or go to sleep as well. So i feel there should
Since 1990s, many scientists agree that exercise has positive impacts on people’s physical health and mental health (SIME WE, 1987). From Morgan and O’Connor’s research, people can reduce stress and state anxiety by doing physical activities; also gain emotional pleasure from the process (Morgan and O’Connor, 1988). Later in 1997, Landers states that physical activities can reduce people depression after weeks of regular and routine exercise. In addition, people can benefit from more
Everyone has a opinion on diffrent issues in their hometown, and yes their opinions matter but on the issue on dog parks i am going to provide some reasons why i agree with that dog parks are benefical.
Just like people, dogs need exercise. How much exercise depends on the dog's breed and physical condition. Dogs bred to herd or hunt are strong breeds with great stamina requiring good, daily workouts. The more mentally alert and active your dog, the more exercise and/or playtime he'll likely need. Just because your dog is out exercising and having fun doesn't mean that they don't have to be obedient.
When it comes to this issue both sides of the argument are well considerd in my perception. Being a very indecisive person it takes me alot of mental effort to figure out what it is that i want, That beig said the most reason solution comes down to data and statistics. Atleast in my opinion the side with the most beneficial data is the one that triumphs the opposing side; in response i suppose the benefit of a dog park can be a positive thing and a negative entity depending on the mental perspective that it inflicts on other individiual's and the economy.
They may express their emotion in a voiceless and uncontrollable outbursts, along with destructive behaviors to