preview

Duckweed Growth

Decent Essays

The main purpose of this experiment is to examine how certain components in an environment can affect the growth pattern of a plant, or in this case, the Lemna minor, or duckweed. In this experiment, we use the pH level as a variable component to examine the population growth of the duckweed.

I hypothesize that the duckweed growth will be higher as the pH of the water is lower, and as the pH becomes more neutral/alkalinized, the plants’ growth will increase in a slower rate than the lower pH level waters. My reason for this hypothesis is because the water’s pH changes the availability of dissolved nutrient that the plan can have access to. The higher pH the water, the less micronutrients the plant can have access to. Also, the higher pH …show more content…

The point where the fronds were highest in population was between 5/22/2015 to 5/26/2015, with 14 fronds present. On the final day of the testing period, the pH 5 tubes had 13 fronds, which was the highest population outcome of all the tubes. The pH 6 tubes’ population growth was not stable. At the start, there were 6 fronds and it increased up to 8 fronds (on 5/13/2015), but it decreased after that. On 6/1/2015, it was able to grow again up to 3 fronds and then to 5 fronds the day after. The pH 7 tubes’ population seemed constant staying around 8 or 9 fronds between the dates 5/15/2015 to 5/26/2015. The ‘control’ test tube could be considered the most stable of all the tubes because it didn’t have a time period where the population increased or decreased significantly. The only time the number of fronds decreased was between dates 5/26 to 5/28, losing 2 fronds. From the start of this experiment, the control tube’s population steadily increased with 9 fronds as the …show more content…

The pH 5 tubes are the most acidic and the ones that experienced the highest population growth, which would make my hypothesis correct. But when comparing the pH 6 and 7 tubes, the pH 7 tubes had more fronds than the pH 6 tubes with 2 more fronds as the total outcome. It was just convenient that the most acidic tube was able to have the highest population growth while the more neutral tubes had lower growth. My hypothesis is false because I thought the lowest pH would have the most population growth while the highest pH would have the least, which is wrong because the pH 7 tubes had more fronds than the pH 6 tubes. My hypothesis would have been correct if the outcome total of the pH 6 and 7 tubes were switched, to perfectly align with my

Get Access