The election of 2000 is a true story based on the presidential campaign between Governor Bush and vice-president Al Gore. This election was significant due to the controversy regarding Florida’s ballots and became the first election where the Supreme Court largely affected the outcome of the presidential election. With Bush leading the poll by 1,784 votes, this allowed Gore’s campaign to request a mandatory machine recount with a 0.3% difference in votes. However, many of Florida's counties refused to rerun the ballots in the machine. Instead, they would rerun the memory card. As a result, ballot chad's became the dilemma of the election and possibly change the entire outcome in presidential history. Under those circumstances, Gore’s campaigned
It doesn’t take a political expert to see that the 2000 presidential election between Bush and Gore was extremely illegitimate. This can be observed through the recount incident which took place in the state of Florida. Many people, especially seniors, felt that they had not voted for the right candidate, which was due to a confusing ballot setup. The ballots were called “butterfly ballots”. These ballots, as one could imagine, had candidates on either side which the voter could choose from. Seems simple enough, right? Unfortunately, that was not the case. The font on the ballots were extremely minuscule, as well as condensed. To add to that, the voter had to use a pin to make a puncture next to their selection. Some people, who were either
The 2000 President Election isn’t considered to be the typical election that occurs every four years in our society. I am opening up the discussion of this important topic in American presidential history by first sharing a fact that not many people may know: there have been three previous presidential elections in which one candidate won the popular vote but not the electoral vote and lost the election. The 2000 Presidential Election was considered to be one of the most highly contested elections in presidential election history (Summary). The election was between Governor George W. Bush (R-TX) and Vice President Al Gore (D-TN). On Election Day night, news stations across the country were all giving an early win of Florida to Gore and
As in the past, the media was covering the all important election. They had always relied on exit polls as the polls closed across the nation. In reality, the Florida results were just too close to call. Nevertheless, that did not stop the media from doing so. Not once, but twice, major news media outlets were erroneous in their report. Around 8pm, it was declared that Al Gore was the projected winner of the electoral votes in the state of Florida. However, a couple of hours later, the projection was retracted and restated as Florida as being too close to call. Then, just after 2am on November 8, the mistake was made for a second time. The major networks declared George W. as the winner. This even led to Al Gore calling the Governor to concede. However, as Gore prepared to address his supporters in Nashville, Tennessee, he was alert to the shrinking numbers in Bush¡¦s lead. The final total was now less than one half of a percent lead in favor of Bush. That immediately calls for a recount of votes under state law. Subsequently, Gore called Bush and retracted his concession. It wasn¡¦t over yet! One thing was, Al Gore had prevailed in the popular vote but without Florida¡¦s tally, the electoral vote was up in the air. The election wasn¡¦t over and the recounts began.
After everything was said and done the decisions by the courts were all legitimate, however, the counting of votes and the numbers that came out of them may have not been legitimate. For instance some counties would count the dimples in the voting ballots while others weren’t. Then there was Katherine Harris, all of her decisions were controversial and there wasn’t a single one that the people could be satisfied with. The results of some her choices were : direct insults to her, the delay of the election, and vote count loss. Others were going on saying that Bush was selected by Harris herself and he wasn’t fairly elected, this is based off of the choices she decided upon making. Some of those impactful choices would be her not extending the recount deadlines, the attempt to throw out overseas ballots that hadn’t arrived by the deadline, ordered the following counties to stop recounting :Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach. Now along with some of that information lies the fact that the election process wasn’t fully developed and thought through for a situation of this sort.
Backstabbing, smear campaigns, schemes, and controversial polling methods seem commonplace in elections today, but these tactics have been utilized since the turn of the 19th century. During the “revolution of 1800,” two close friends squared off in a political showdown that helped shape modern American politics. This illuminating display shows how politics in America has always been rife with corruption, unwritten agreements, and favors, all of which have become a part of our political system. And by exposing this truth, Ferling shows that our immortalized Founding Fathers were just typical politicians. John Ferling’s Adams vs. Jefferson: The Tumultuous Election of 1800 tells the narrative of the rise of the nascent union and the politics
The 2000 presidential election was completely illegitimate. Although it seemed Bush had won the 25 electoral votes there was a difference of 1,784 votes; which means there must be a mandatory recount. This recount happened because many of the voters in one county believed that their vote was wrong. They believed this because of the confusing ballot they had to use. The Vice President Al Gore’s presidential campaign team used this recount to get those votes they needed to win. However, this recount only had six days and there were 67 counties. This is where it becomes illegitimate because Katharine Harris decided she would not accept the votes past the deadline even though she was legally allowed to. As a result, The Al Gore campaign thought
The election in 2000 was a pivotal election for voters’ beliefs in the system of voting, over how we vote, who gets to vote, and will all of the votes be counted? In Florida in the year 2000, the voting problem was apparent throughout the day and night. People claimed that the lack of control and clarity is “an abomination of American justice.” Because of the poor planning and systems, Florida was forced to recount their election which brought out all of Florida’s voting problems to the American news. Throughout the dilemma, debates were being held between the United States Supreme Court and the Florida Supreme Court on the results of the many recounts.
The idea of change played a prominent role in both the Election of 2016 and the Election of 1980. The elections came at a time when the people needed new, innovative ideas to revolutionize the fragile state of the nation. In 1980, as resentment towards the Carter administration rapidly increased, the Reagan administration provided hope and a chance to return to the nationalistic prime of the United States. Reagan utilized the people’s pride in America as a means of uniting voters from a variety of backgrounds. Trump made bold statements, all behind a lofty promise to return America to the golden age of the Reagan administration. Trump used the slogan “Make America Great Again” as a means of highlighting the United States and the citizens above the world’s view of the nation. Similarly, Reagan promised that the United States would never return to ‘stagnation’ and by prioritizing the economic standing of the nation, Reagan rallied democrats, republicans, and independents alike. Each candidate utilized lofty promises to do things differently than the previous administration to unify a new group of voters. The Election of 1980 and the Election of 2016 also contained similarities in the failures of the
Back in 2000, the presidential election was decided by 537 votes in Florida. According to the New York Times, there were 620,000 Floridians barred from voting that were convicted of a felony, regardless of the crime committed. That’s a large poll of Floridians that didn’t get to exercise their right to vote. Had those 620,000 Floridians voted, the 2000 presidential elections may have had a different outcome. It is very important that all Americans exercise their right to vote to ensure we the people select the right representatives in office. There are certain felony crimes that should absolutely ban those said individuals their right to vote, but there are other crimes that are not as serious that should not impact those said individuals their right to vote. The 2000 elections were just and example of how
There are multiple skeptics behind the 2000 Election between George W. Bush and Al Gore. Presently the election was neck-to-neck between both candidates. The results come out and Bush is the winner by 1,784 votes (1). On the other hand, the votes counting machine started to show different numbers and elder citizens believed they selected the wrong candidates in the ballot. Arguably, Bush is in my favor of winning the election fairly. Although the movie, “Recount”, portrayed what really happened and how inequities the court systems are at that time. In fact, every courts in the U.S. was on the Republican side except Florida. As the matter of fact, Florida requested a recount and Bush still won by a margin of 537 votes (1). Since the votes were
With the presidential election hanging on only few hundred votes in a single state, there were numerous lawsuits and multiple requests for recounts. There were bitter disputes concerning ridiculous ballots, supposed missing names on voting rolls, and accounts of subjecting minority voters to multiple requests for identification. The punch card ballots, hanging chad, posed a major problem--they were
The 2000 U.S. presidential election Bush vs. Gore case between Governor George W, Bush and U.S. Vice president Al Gore. It begins with the election on November 7 and ends with the supreme court ruling, which stopped the Florida election recount on December
The election of 2000 was the closest and most controversial election in all U.S. history. This event was the fierce competition full of irregularities and unfairness between George W. Bush and Al Gore to become the first president elected in the 21st century that turned into an intense political and legal battle to decide the presidency. It was such an interesting and unique election because unlike how elections are supposed to work, the election of 2000, for many unique reasons, did not end with a clear winner. This event was not only an election, but a test of american democracy that challenged many people’s trust in the american court system, and left millions of americans asking the question, who really won the election of
The 2000 presidential election in Florida between Al Gore and George Bush was rigged before it even took place. Over 200,000 votes were going to be thrown out in one way or another. This election fraud was to be carried out by republican forces that run the state. Government Jeb Bush, secretary of state Catherine Harris and director of the bureau of elections Clay Robert's. This trio conspired before during and after the election to secure the 25 electoral votes for the presidential election. First they paid data base technologies $4 million to create a list of people they wanted disqualified for voting. They came up of a list of 8,000 names of people accused felons tough almost none were. They created another list of 58,000
The United States presidential election is one of the most important things that happens to us as U.S citizens. We wait four years to see if our previous president has done the job we wanted him to do, and if not, we get to elect a knew leader of our country. The President has a lot of influence on our country, therefore we want to elect the best one for our nation. Thus, our founding fathers created the electoral college. Designing the mode of selecting the President had to be one of the most difficult tasks that confronted the framers. The difficulty in the legislative case lay in the fact that almost all delegates knew exactly what they wanted, but different delegates wanted different things: small-state delegates wanted to preserve the