Emergency Preparedness Is Not Full Proof

871 Words4 Pages
Do you believe we could ever be fully prepared for all natural disasters to avoid the meltdown that occurred at the Fukushima nuclear power plant? Why or why not?
As history has depicted Emergency preparedness is not full proof, even with the best technology. It is impossible to predict the magnitude, timing and the aftermath of all natural disasters. However, the leaders of the nuclear plant such as the Fukushima nuclear plant must be cognizant, of the importance of emergency preparedness through simulation of different possible scenarios, it seems the company was overconfident in their ability to keep their nuclear materials contained within the their designated areas. Sadly, such assumptions resulted in one of the worst disasters in Japan’s history. Prior to the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster, the executives were warned about the inadequacy of the wall built to prevent water from spilling from the ocean onto the complex. Most scientists had feared that the barrier protecting the nuclear complex was not strong enough to endure huge waves in the event of a strong Tsunami, and their fears came to light on March 11, 2011.
Overall, one cannot be fully prepared for a disaster such the Fukushima nuclear meltdown because there is always the slim chance that nature may through a curve ball, but efforts must be made by establishments to make sure all possible scenarios are addressed in emergency preparedness protocol.
What are the two top sources of natural and man-made
Get Access