As he was walking home from a long day at work, he thinks about what he would do if he was rich. Oh, how much he would want to be rich instead of working in a warehouse with low pay in the 1950s. This man thought about if trying to rob a bank would be easy, but he decided not to and had to simple of a mind to do anything complex. Then something came to mind, he could kill an individual that had a great amount of money that could make anybody happy. But how could he acquire this money just by killing someone, it seemed impossible until an idea came to his head. Every since he was he always had an affection for magic, he even knew a few tricks, but the best thing he was good at was illusion. The plan could only be created by the smartest so …show more content…
“What’s the situation officer,” I ask the policeman that arrived on the scene before me. “It seems to be that no one broke in, but we don’t know anything else,” he respond to me with a solid tone. Hmmmm, thats weird. I swore that day that the anonymous said that there was a break in, and I don’t see any sign of a break in at all. We the police organized a group to break down the door, but I got bored and decided to break it down myself. It wasn’t hard, in fact, I just opened it. I begin to start walking but I notice something. The house looks like a tornado went through the inside of the house. I begin to search the house to see what the call was about and find a very unusual sighting. The was a vault inside the house, but it was open and seemed to be just an endless void. I notice some rigidity stair that seems to have a few broken floor boards that seemed snapped or broken. Careful as I could I begin making my way up them seeing if I could find anything else. I start wondering through the endless corridors that seem to have been pointless, until I found it, what we were called about. The corpse had a red ooze flowing throughout and over it. My detective senses begin to kick in and I start labeling parts of the body that seemed reasonable to look over. Then something caught my eye. I saw blood spots trickling away from the body and into a bathroom. I followed the trail
In the case of Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962), the Supreme Court ruled that a law may not punish a status; i.e., one may not be punished to being an alcoholic or for being addicted to drugs. However, of course, one may be punished for actions such as abusing drugs. The question becomes; What if the status “forces” the action? What if a person, because of his/her addiction to drugs, is “forced” by the addiction to purchase and abuse the illegal drugs? Would punishing that person be unfairly punishing a status?
According to Tim Fernholz, “Quartz” (digital news website), out of the seven billion people who inhabit Earth, six point eight billion own a cellular phone. Do not think that all six point eight billion people who own cell phones are adults. Millions of young children own cell phones at an age that is too young. There should be an age requirement on cell phones because children are not mature enough, can suffer from sleep deprivation, and will possibly be exposed to harmful information. Adults cannot expect for their young child to handle all of the responsibilities of owning a cell phone. With that being said, children will abuse the right of owning a cell phone because they do not know any better. Parents across the globe should learn to restrict their child.
Denzel Washington plays veteran L.A.P.D. Det. Sgt. Alonzo Harris. For thirteen years this highly decorated cop has been on the front lines in the war against narcotics. He's pledged to protect and serve the citizens of Los Angeles, but his optimism about police work has long since been chipped away by the reality of life on the streets. He and the tight-knit group of officers that report to him have crossed the line between legality and corruption. They find themselves breaking the laws they're supposed to enforce. Alonzo's ethics and his logic are in complete opposition to the "book" which most cops must follow. "It takes a thief to catch a thief,"
Causes of crime are arguably criminology’s most important and largest research topic. In this process of research, criminologists and academics have used numerous theories in attempts to explain how and why people resort to crime (Ellis, Beaver, Wright, 2009). The purpose of this paper is to examine a case study first with the use of strain theories (ST), followed by social learning theory (SLT). The first section will involve a summary of the case of R v Mark Andrew HUGHES (2009) NSWDC 404 involving an outline of the offender’s personal life, of his crimes, and his punishment handed down by
SANCTIONS, PERCEPTIONS, AND CRIME: IMPLICATIONS FROM CRIMINAL DETERRENCE According to the journal article, the concept of deterrence is simple; it is the omission of a criminal act because of the fear of sanctions or punishments. Deterrence is an important foundation of the criminal justice system. Law enforcement is there to apprehend those that break the law, and to convince the public that there is a risk of apprehension and punishment if they commit a crime. Laws provide a host of different sanctions for the commission of offenses such as: fines, probation, imprisonment, mandatory minimum sentences, the “three strikes” law, and others are all enacted with the expatiation that sanction threats can deter crime is at the heart of the criminal Justice system.
Many academics in the field of social sciences have focused much of their research on the topic of crime. Scholars of many disciplines have tried to attempt answer the question why humans commit crimes. Max Weber defined explanatory understanding and adequacy on the level of meaning as ways to understand why people act certain ways in the world by contextualizing these reasons to cultural norms. By using Weber’s definitions, we can understand why people commit crimes of larceny, vandalism, and weapon possession, and why rates for these crimes differ between men and women. Focusing on larceny and vandalism, adequacy on the level of meaning may help identify the causes of these crimes.
Crime in Urban America has been around for many years, it is atrocious and there are many reasons why people commit these crimes. Crime is a big issue all around the world and while there is more production of drugs and loss of jobs, the crime rate will continue to increase day by day. While there are many motives that contribute to crime the most obvious causes would be poverty which causes the poor to adapt into a violent and aggressive behavior to which later becomes ingrained into them. The environment where a person grows up in which could consist of gangs that participate in illegal activities. Abuse of drugs or alcohol attribute to crime because people commit abominable crimes while under the influence. The anger that an individual
This paper will describe my understanding of the text and of the lectures provided in the class. Unlike most classes, where I understood only my view of the text, this class was geared so each student would understand each other’s view. 3 An organization is a collective that has some boundary and internal structure that engages in activities related to some complex set of goals. Members of organizations attempt to meet their psychological, ego and emotional needs within the organization. Criminal justice organizations are particularly unique compared to other public or private sector organizations because of the governmental granted authority. Management within these organizations can be defined as the process by
Sentence was passed and in that moment my whole life completely changed. In the background, you could hear the people chant, “Justice has finally been served!” They don’t know me I thought. Everybody makes mistakes, right? But, where was my second chance in life. My luck, the death penalty became legal again and eagerly waiting for me to become its newest member. My palms grew sweaty as always when I grew nervous and scared. There was nothing I could do. These people wanted me to pay for what I put them through.
“Sure, bring him in and let’s see what he has to say,” Detective Ward said.
law is law that has been built up over the years by decisions of the
From the beginning of time there have always been crimes against persons. People went by the saying “An eye for an eye”. You stole from your neighbor, they stole from you. You hurt someone, they hurt you. It wasn’t until the 1940’s people started taking a closer look into these crimes against person, which they later called victimology. This paper will look into victimology and their theories as we go back into the past and how victimology is now.
For hundreds of years society has sought a theory of criminality with which to strike back against the dark figure of crime. Theories of crime have always been heavily tinted by the social climate in which they were created. For example, until the 18th century Western European criminological thought was firmly rooted in Christianity, which considered crime the work of the Devil. Punishments were meted out not based on the merit of one 's actions, but to turn away the evil and reinforce order in a community. With the dawn of the Enlightment and the parting of the philosophical clouds a cast of venerable philosophers and scientists arrived to begin imparting their insights to the growing intellectual community. Men like Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham embraced humanist principles that declared all men equal, rational actors with the ability to make logical choices of their own free will. Thus Classical School criminologists advocated punishments that were rational, logical, and proportionate to the crime so as to outweigh its benefits and deter other rational actors from committing the same prohibited act. Early 20th century criminology was heavily influenced by Darwin 's Theory of Evolution and Herbert Spencer 's derivative philosophy of Social Darwinism. Criminologists of the Social Darwinism era were men like Cesare Lombroso, who used the pseudo-scientific principles of Atavism to promote his theory that criminality can be traced to genetic and physiological traits like
Crimes in prison have been a part of our prisons since prisons themselves have been developed. It is almost certain that the criminals who end up in an institution in the first place will commit crimes while incarcerated. Prisons have come a long way over the years and with trial and error they have discovered many effective ways to help drop crime rates. Mail is monitored and read on occasion and is a privilege for inmates that can be taken away. Though many of the new policies and procedures have been effective, it is the well- trained staff that keeps crimes down. Crimes in our prisons have been declining, having the proper staffing in these institution’s plays a crucial part in keeping crimes down.
In general the definition of a crime is an act punishable by law, usually considered an evil act. Crime refers to many types of misconduct forbidden by law. Crimes include such things as murder, stealing a car, resisting arrest, possession or dealing of illegal drugs, being nude in public , drunk driving, and bank robbery. Crime is an act that has been timeless and has been committed practically since the start of time. For example, ever since Cain killed his brother Abel (B.C.), people being charged with witchcraft in the 1600’s, prostitution, to the current crimes of modern day(A.D.). Even though crime has existed throughout time it has progressed and branched out taking many types forms.