Kenzi Winnegrad
Professor Hojem
English
2 October 2017
Exploratory Essay: Animal Testing
Animal testing is an extremely controversial topic because it deals with delicate matters and matters of humanity. Animal testing is intended to help consumers buy safe and healthy products, but they are torturing innocent animals by doing so. People that are in favor of animal testing usually are also advocates for medical research and progress, though there have been other proven methods of research. But they don’t think of it as tormenting and killing animals. On the other hand, a lot of people are compassionate about animals and think that testing on them is inhumane. These advocates of the animals think that an animal’s safety should be put
…show more content…
The author states that biologically, animals and people are very different. Additionally, “the biological differences between humans and animals make it possible for a chemical or substance to be both safe for animals yet toxic to humans” (Miley, “Cons Against Animal Testing”). There is the legal aspect of the topic to consider also. Many people think that the Animal Welfare Act legally protects animals and that they often are not harmed during testing. But, the author’s thoughts may suggest otherwise. The Animal Welfare Act protects pets like dogs and cats, however it provides no protection for birds, mice, and rats. These birds, mice, and rats “make up more than 90 percent of all laboratory animals” (Miley, “Cons Against Animal Testing”). To not be covered by this Animal Welfare Act means that they legally “are subjected to painful medical procedures and conditions without anesthesia or other forms of pain relief” (Miley, “Cons Against Animal Testing”). This author’s ideas directly conflicts with the ideas in my first source. My last source I found doesn’t really favor either side of the argument. The author provides information about alternatives to animal testing. The author believes that new technology could put forward a better way of testing than using animals. The source offers thorough descriptions of new alternative testing modes, for example, “the human cell-based in vitro” (“Alternatives to Animal Testing”), which
Asking just about any animal rights activists on the thoughts of animal testing, it is reasonable to expect that the majority of them would address crucial flaws in many of the laws in regards to animals and how animals are supposedly “protected” by these laws. Trained scientists and researchers take on the key role of testing on animals in laboratories and facilities throughout the world, using the excuse that we are expanding knowledge and furthering medical research. In the United States alone, there are very few laws truly protecting animals from the unnecessary amounts of suffering the research forces upon them with many exceptions. Additionally, in reference to the scientists who perform these tests, the author of the article,
If you lived in 1900, you could only expect to live to 47.3 years old (berkeley.edu). However, today you can expect to live to see your 78th birthday, that’s a difference of 31.5 years (cdc.gov). Why such an age difference in just over 100 years? There are several factors that contribute to a longer life expectancy today. They include, healthier lifestyles, better hygiene, and notice of public health. But, the greatest contribution comes from medical advancements, such as vaccinations, surgical procedures, and medications that have been discovered through the process of animal testing. Animals have contributed greatly to the prolonged life spans of humans.
In the 1880’s, Louis Pasteur conducted one of the most unpleasant series of animal experiments in the history of the fight against infectious disease. Unable to see the organism that causes rabies with the microscopes available, he convinced a skeptical medical community of the microorganism’s existence and also the possibility of vaccinating against it. He did this by doing work on rabbits and dogs. In 1885, after much heart searching, he tried out his rabies vaccine on a nine-year old boy, Joseph Meister, who had been bitten 14 times by a rabid dog. Thanks to Pasteur’s vaccine, the boy lived. (Hampson 1) The life of Joseph Meister and many others like him have been saved by animal experimentation. No matter
Animal testing has become a controversial issue among many people in the world today. Some of these people involved in this controversial debate believe that animal testing is unethical and should be replaced by other methods. The other group of people in this debate believe that animal testing is necessary in order to research new products that cannot be tested on humans. Traditional animal testing forces animals to undergo numerous experiments for different forms of research. Medical, cosmetic, and many other types of research experiments use animals to provide the results on how the new product may affect humans. There are many people that support the use of alternative methods to animal research and then
Animal testing is an intense shared subject, with an enormous deal of emotion, passion, and thoughts on both sides concerning the ethics of this practice. In attendance there is a grey area as well, as some people support animal testing only under special situations whereas they contest its use for other
"A Campaign to End Animal Testing: Introducing the PETA International Science Consortium Ltd. " Alternatives to Laboratory Animals: ATLA, vol. 42, no. 6, Dec. 2014, pp. 387-393. EBSCOhost, proxy.library.kent.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip&db=mdc&AN=25635647&site=eds-live&scope=site. In the article "A Campaign to End Animal Testing: Introducing the PETA International Science Consortium Ltd." Stoddart and Brown argue that successful developments of non-animal techniques and existing data won’t guarantee the end of animal testing.
I personally believe that we should use animal testing due to its benefits. A human’s life should be valued over the life of other animals. However, while the animals are being tested they should be treated as humanely as possible. There are currently other alternatives such as in vitro where cells are tested in a test tube. The problem is that the cells in the test tube may not react the same way as the body will react. Even though there are other alternatives, none of them are as effective as animal testing. The number of animals used is still increasing, so the other options are not viable as of yet. When the other options do improve and are effective, there should be a movement away from animal
Imagine that you woke up one morning and discovered that your favorite pet was gone, and later found out that it was kidnapped, sold into experimentation, and later discovered that your pet had died from animal testing. How would you feel? Because according to Daniel Engber in his article “Where’s Pepper?” this happened to a farmer back in 1965 where his dog Pepper got kidnaped and later died of experimentation. As far back as ancient Greek writing we have been testing on animals and there have been strong feelings from both sides. Those who are for animal testing say animal testing has made some great medicines like vaccines for hepatitis B and C. And those who are against animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane, that there are other methods, and animals are so different that it’s a waste of time and money. It is clear that overall that animal testing is bad because it is a waste of time because animals are very different from human beings, a waste of money because of 21st century tech, and an unnecessary waste of animal life because experiments on animals is cruel and causes animals to suffer so it should
Animal testing has been a controversial problem in today’s society and it affects people from all over the world1 not just animal activists or scientists. Most of the products and medicines used today have been tested on animals. These animals used in experiments have been thought to only benefit society but morally this hurts our society. This hurts our society because now animal testing has become a social normality and then humans have started to become null to this as time goes on. This slippery slope will only get worse if this is not stopped. This also hurts our society because scientist, physicians, and lawmakers must decide the justification for
There are now alternative testing methods that exist that animals are no longer needed . In glass testing is when cells are put into a petri dish and are studied. This is more effective then animal testing because human
Scientists today are always creating new substances for our everyday use, whether that be for medicinal purposes or cosmetic purposes are required to be tested and have been proven to show that there are not large probabilities of the user getting infections, or becoming sickly from usage of these products, so what do scientist usually use as a testing basis? The answer is animal testing. Now animal testing is not a new concept, and has been used for centuries and has been used as tool for scientist to correct any errors in their substances before releasing it to the population, but, with any public topic such as the topic of animal testing, there is a lot of back and forth argument as to how humane it is and if there
Animal experimentation is a cruel objective that causes many innocent animals to feel pain, suffrage, and untended with the love of others. All people have different opinions of what they think and feel about animal testing, including the positive effects and the usages that it has made over the past years and the negative effects that occur on all of the tested animals during the entire process. In my case, I do not think that animal testing is okay and should be banned throughout all states of America, not parts of it. It has been scientifically calculated that 80% of countries do not have laws that ban any type animal testing. People believe that notifying other people about the usages of their products is extremely important because not
Just imagine someone picking you up placing you in a secluded laboratory, holding you against your will , and vehemently having your face and body stuffed with makeup or any other cosmetic item. I look at this situation as if i was in the place of the animal being tested, I sat an dreamt about it for a second, I thought to myself this is horrible and someone has to put an end to this immediately, If it is still going on.This topic has always been a touchy one for me, Considering the fact I 've been pro animal my whole.When i say that i mean just measly thought of an animal getting hurt or brutally chastised would put me down every time. What led me to feeling this way was a video that was shown to me by my older brother when i was about five or six years old.My older brother was some what of a bully my younger sister and I, So when he showed me the video i was expected it be one those videos where a dark demonic figure jumps out and franticly shocks you.So i was prepared for what was to come,When the video began it displayed a gorgeous scenery of a farm which looked it the setting could be somewhere in southern California. hen the title of the video displayed on the screen “Meat Frenzy” is what it said. By that point i was nervous and confused of what was to come next.So then the unbelievable happened,The cameraman enters this factory looking barn.The following scenes contents was so gruesome and horrific it made me sick to my stomach,There were machines carrying live cattle
Animal experimentation by scientists can be cruel and unjust, but at the same time it can provide long term benefits for humanity. Animals used in research and experiments have been going on for 2,000 years and keep is going strong. It is a widely debated about topic all over the world. Some say it is inhuman while others say it’s for the good of human kind. There are many different reasons why people perform experiments and why others total disagree with it.
“Beauty without cruelty” is the outcry that can be heard from animal right activists around the world. The FDA does not require companies to perform tests on animals but if the cosmetic product contains chemicals that can be seen as toxins, testing becomes a necessity. There are currently thirteen safety tests that are performed on animals.