preview

Essay

Decent Essays

The central claims that Samples uses in order to argue that caps on the amount individuals can contribute to candidates for federal office should be abolished are contribution limits have led to creation and widespread use of Super PACs, the idea that quid pro quo donations are not corrupt, and finally that there is no correlation between trust in government and capping donations. Proponents of getting rid of the cap argue that the contribution limits have created Super PACs, which have no contribution limits; therefore, defeating the purpose of the limits on individual donations. Samples are disputes the argument that no cap on individual donations is corrupt. First, he points out that most donations given to a candidate are given …show more content…

This means that, in total, a marriage couple can give $10,800. Briffault specifies that $10,800 is over 12$ of median household’s income, meaning that this is a lot of money. Briffault also points out that individuals can give up to $33,000 to nation party committees each year. Additionally, Briffault states that in 2014 less than 0.5% of donations from individuals were more than $200, and 80% of those donations were under $2,500. However, this small percentage of donations actually accounted for 77% of total dollars donated by individuals. Therefore, the cap on individual donations only really effects a small minority of donors, who already account for over ¾ of the total donations. Briffault additionally argues to that large individual donations turn into political favors from elected officials. For example, both Donald Trump (before he got into politics) and Charles Koch are big political donors, who have been quoted saying they expect favors in return for their large donations. Finally, proponents of keeping the individual donation limit assert that most large donations come from non-constituents. For example, in 2014 Briffault states that 64% of donations that were $200 or more in House elections came from non-constituents; similarly, 19 out of 28 Senate incumbents seeking reelection received more than half of $200 or more contributions from non-constituents. In my opinion, the caps on individual donations should remain at the current

Get Access