Since the series revolves around real life events that occurred, it is quite accurate how the criminal justice is represented. In the series, we see everything that we would see in the criminal justice field, for instance the courtroom actors such as the judge, prosecutor, defense attorney, bailiffs, courtroom clerk, and jury. Everyone in the O.J. Simpson was important and they all received more attention than they should have, but the ones who got the most attention and had the biggest role in this case was the jury. Jury selection is selected from the eligible population over the age of 18 who has complied from the DMV. There is a voir dire that process by which jury members are selected, attorneys and judge seek to gain information about …show more content…
Greathouse, she states all criminal defendants, have the right to a fair and impartial jury. In both real life and in the TV series it is accurate how a defendant has the right to a fair and impartial. What makes the O.J. Simpson so different from the TV series is that the trial lasted for over eight months, one of the longest trials ever. The reason why it lasted so long was due to the jury, the jury was frustrated because when they were selected they were informed that it would only be a two month trial, and what also makes it different than everything else was how they kept the jury hostage in a hotel room with no communication. The jury could not see their families, or friends or speak to anyone about the trial or even watch TV, hear the radio or even read magazines. What Greathouse states in her article relate to the reason why the trial lasted longer than it should have due to the reason that a defendant has the right to a fair and impartial jury. During voir dire, the judge and/or attorneys probe potential jury members for pre-existing attitudes or beliefs that would prevent the jurors from fairly evaluating evidence presented during trial. In the
The people directly involved with this case are Judge Lance Ito, the prosecution lawyers, Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden, the defense lawyers, Johnnie Cochran, Robert Shapiro and Robert Blasier , the jury and the defendant, O.J. Simpson. The families of the victims have also been present in the courtroom, as well as other spectators and news media. This case has heard one hundred and twenty witnesses over a nine month period.
The jury causes a great waste of time. It has been pointed out that a trial by jury usually requires two to three times the amount of time
Every day people are convicted of crimes or arrested for other reasons. Once they are convicted they are summoned to court, this begins the jury process. Citizens are randomly chosen to serve on jury duty. The citizens on the jury will use the jury system to determine if the person being accused is guilty or innocent. Trials can become very long or they can be short it just depends on the topic and how long it takes to decide on what the consequences will be. The jury system is the main trial and the main decision of whether or not someone is right or wrong.
Known around the world as O. J., famous celebrity Orenthal James Simpson was arrested and convicted for the murder of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her mistress, Ron Lyle Goldman. Although Simpson denied any participation in the crime, the FBI found numerous evidence that proved hands down that he was the murderer. After a trial that lasted more than eight months, he was acquitted and was able to go home. Personally, I feel that the jury made the wrong decision.
On July 20, 2017, O.J. Simpson was scheduled to have his parole trial after being in jail for armed robbery, assault with a deadly weapon, and kidnapping. Celebrities have been known to have less harsh punishments for crime compared to an everyday person. O.J. Simpson had already been acquitted of the two brutal murders of his ex-wife and another man. He also was granted parole after only serving close to nine years in prison for the previously listed charges of assault, kidnapping, and armed robbery. A blog post will be used to explore bias in celebrity crime trials, such as jurors altering their vote just because they admire the person. This admiration can blind people from obvious
Within the court proceedings, the first reality video explains the process of jury selection, or what they would call jury “rejection.” They think of it as rejection because they are not really picking the juries they are rejecting the ones they do not need. What I knew before watching this film is that juries are a set of citizens chosen to appear in court to hear and help come to a verdict about a trial. Somethig new that I learned was that jurors must fill out a questionaire so that the attorney are easily able to pick who they would want on the panel.
as a citizen by sitting on the jury with the help of a signer - but
Thoughtout the trial of the jury, I’ve saw all three characters stand against their case and try to defend their case. Even though, the character and defense attorney give great evidence against the reason on committing sin. The prosecutors did a well job of giving opposing side of the defendant. This caused me to wonder which out the the three characters committed the greatest sin.
Outlined in the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution is the criminal defendants right to a public trial by an impartial jury, meaning that all juries should be fair and unbiased. Unfortunately in our American Criminal Justice system today, it is nearly impossible to find a jury full of unbiased citizens. Throughout the film the characters remain anonymous, expect for the fact that they drop subtle hints to their underlying biases. For example, we are aware that the defendant is a minority of that time, and of low social standing. Immediately, biases are set within the jurors whether they are aware of it or not.
“The presumption of innocence’s is the bedrock of our foundation; its what separates us from all the other countries in the world. So as of now you have heard no evidence, could you vote?” My boss, the defense attorney, started asking the 40 potential jurors and one after another, “I haven’t heard anything, guilty.” His frustration grew as he asked each individually.
The Selection and Role of a Jury in a Criminal Trial This assignment focuses on how a jury is selected and its role in a
Some Jurors will reach a quick verdict or not properly think over the evidence just to get it over and done with so they can go home.
The decision that the jury must make is a very difficult decision that must be unanimous. It is rare that everyone who is a part of the jury all agree in the beginning. They debate for hours, days, possibly weeks over just one case until a verdict is finally reached and unanimous. Ultimately, it
2.1)Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Greece, Hongkong, Gibraltar, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Sweden, England (England and Welsh), Scotland, Northern Ireland, United States(next,i will introduce how the United states use jury system)
Richard Jury is the fictional lead in the Richard Jury series of novels by bestselling American mystery thriller writer Martha Grimes. Grimes wrote the first novel featuring the lead character Jury titled The Man With a Load of Mischief in 1981. The novels series is so popular that over three decades since first publication, it is still ongoing.