Cole pg. 1
Cole Methvin
Mrs. Montgomery
5/3/17
Research Paper
The 2nd Amendment “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. This line taken from the 2nd Amendment states to all who live under the governing power of the Bill of Rights as well as the Constitution of the United States of America, that their right to own and to operate a weapon can’t be taken away. It is a privilege to be able to bear arms, as some countries do not have the right to do so. We must understand that the 2nd Amendment is as important as any other amendment and we must protect our right to bear arms.
The founding fathers that organized our country by the means of the Constitution as well as the Amendments knew that the right to bear arms
…show more content…
They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence … from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurrences and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable … the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that’s good.”
Undoubtedly the founding fathers new that with this amendment there would be much controversy as to whether or not it would be ethical. The 2nd Amendment is in place to protect the innocent, not the criminals. Criminals will always have access to weapons whether they are legal to posses or not, and leave the common citizen an easy target. A criminal will always prefer a victim who is defenseless or unarmed. Regulations of firearms should minimal and should target the criminals, not the law-abiding citizen. It’s not the good citizens that should be punished by taking gun rights away, but they who break the law continuously. Regulating the law abiding citizen on what he or she can or cannot own as far as weapons is completely unfair to them, as criminals will always be able to get weapons if they
People believed that “the right to bear arms is the natural right of resistance and self-preservation, when the sanction of society and laws are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression”. On the opposite hand, many states at the time believed that to give the people the right to own a gun was unconstitutional because it could be a threat for the state government when everyone was allowed to own guns. Majority of states in America did not want to add the right to bear arms into their state constitution, because there was not a single legal model emerged on how to protect them in the first constitutions drafted by our Founding Fathers. The debate between gun control and non-gun control over the right to bear arms alarmed America. The gun control claimed that the right to bear arms is the basic right that people should have in order for American citizens to defense themselves and for their state.; They believed that the laws prohibiting individuals from carrying firearms only work for the benefit of criminals. On the opposite hand, anti-gun controllers believed that those gun owners should be led by gentlemen of the first fortune and character, because the society without the guidance of gentlemen, those gun controllers’ population might easily become a mob and not a well-regulated militia. After reviewing many opinions from both sides as well as the benefits and effectiveness of the rights, the convention agreed and
In the second amendment, passed in 1791, by James Madison, the people are given the right to bare arms. The right was established to allow the citizens to feel stable and secure. Had a war arisen or a tyrant gained control, the people would not be left defenseless. However, the core purpose of this amendment has been altered through time. Now and days, guns have become a large issue led by debate/ They are being used to unlawfully kill, and have essentially become a threat. However, some people still feel the need to have possession of a gun for protection. Being able to bare arms is still positive because it still allows a sense of security for citizens.
The Second Amendment is not about hunting. It is also not about a right to kill people. It is about the right of the people in a free nation to use firearms at their own discretion. While guns may have been the weapon of choice in numerous mass casualty events, the only prevention and precaution would be to have armed upstanding citizens. Not to tell criminals they cannot use firearms. The Second Amendment allows Americans to protect their family and themselves in the event of a break-in or altercation. It also gives the American people the chance not to be oppressed. I have a very strong stance on the American citizen’s right to bear arms. There will always be people who disagree with owning firearms, however, America as a whole should not bend to their opinion, because the benefits of having an armed population outweighs the detriments of having an unarmed country.
The usage of the 2nd amendment is obvious. Arms are used to self-defense, hunting, and for a Militia. There is nothing in the 2nd amendment that says arms cannot be used for that. Now, people think they have the right to use arms for those things. Anyway, if the government starts taking away this right people would oppose and they will win.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”(understand) comes from the United States constitution. It has for the last decade or so been a topic of an ongoing debate between the people of this nation. It all depends on how you interpret the 27 words. Most people believe that it gives United States citizens the right to bear arms.
Indeed Congress around then did not even feel it important to put an Amendment in the Constitution on the grounds that having a gun was as basic as having underpants. Having a gun around then was common to the point that it was not even consider needing to legitimize it. “Right had not been questioned, for it was viewed as a traditional privilege lying outside the Constitution…” (Hook, 30). Today, is an alternate story. With more regulations on guns being passed, the Second Amendment is the main thing gatherings like the NRA need to clutch. Both sides need to take a seat and discover an answer for this firearm control face off regarding. Then again one day this Amendment will be translated and guns in subject’s hands will be a relic of days gone by, unless obviously it is in a state supported local
The second amendment in the constitution of the United States is the right to bear arms. Many people are now beginning to question whether or not people should be allowed to carry weapons with them. In today's society, there is terrorism, and police shootings happening everyday, which is making people question if everyone should be able to carry weapons. But, stated in the constitution of the United States is the right to bear arms. Everyone has the right to protect themselves and others, and stand up for what they believe in. If the right to bear arms was outlawed, the Constitution of the United States would have to be changed. Everyone has the right to stand up for what they believe in, and should be able to protect themselves.
Our rights as Americans started to take shape when the Constitution of the United States was drawn up by the delegates at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. Three years later, a very important part of American history called the Bill of Rights was added. The Bill of Rights is looked upon and interpreted every day. It gives the citizens of the United States many of the rights and freedoms that we value today, and some of those are in jeopardy. One right that is at stake is our right to bear arms, which is addressed in the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment is a highly debatable topic, and many legal scholars and the Supreme Court have yet to resolve the issues and
The Second Amendment to the United States constitution states “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”(U.S. Constitution). The founding fathers included this in our bill of rights because they feared the federal government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend
The Founding Fathers, through the Bill of Rights, set in stone the basics of the upcoming docile American cultures. The ten amendments were written by many well known delegates, and were able to determine certain aspects of how our people in the land would live by. For instance, the right to bear arms gave us the right to be carrying legally, making us unique to many other countries. This law, initially meant for the people’s safety, had many unforeseen consequences, causing the American society to question themselves on how the ability to bear arms affected their safety.
The right to bear arms is guaranteed in the constitution by the Second Amendment. One of the main issues of the second amendment is whether it was meant to insure that people / citizens in general have firearms for personal service, or was it only intended to insure arms for military service. There are two sides to this conflict, one being pro gun and the other side against guns. Gun control lobbyist believe that there must be more control over firearms and in the other side we have anti-lobbyists and they believe that there is enough control over guns and we should not be able to have weapons and that’s one of the main issues with this statement because it’s related directly to the 2nd Amendment of the constitution where it gives us the right to keep and bear
In recent years, gun control has been one of the most debated topics in the United States. No matter who you ask, everyone always has an opinion on firearm ownership. After every publicized mass shooting, two groups of people form: group #1 wants to ban guns from private ownership in some shape or form, and group #2 fights against them fiercely to protect the constitutional right to bear arms. More specifically, the 2nd amendment to the U.S Constitution states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” (US Const. amend. II).
The second amendment right is the right to bear arms. Many people agree with this amendment and support it since it is there right. Since its a amendment it should not be treated less than any other amendment. “The First Amendment has never been interpreted as giving "the states" the right to peaceably assemble. Nor has the Fourth Amendment been ruled as providing only protection for state officials from unreasonable searches and seizures. Why should the Second Amendment be treated differently?” (LaCourse). Since the Constitution states that the people have a right to bear arms and hold a weapon, there can be no law that can deprive them of that right. It would violate the Constitution and the rights it implements. “The Second Amendment protects 'the right of the people to keep and bear arms,and the Ninth and Tenth Amendments provide that certain rights and powers are retained by and reserved to the people”(LaCourse). Just based the constitution on this argument, no law will ever break the right that the people can bear arms. It even says that the rights given to the people are reserved to them and can never be taken away from them. It gives a guarantee to the people that they have a right to carry a gun and nothing can be done to withhold you from that right. “It should now be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to construe the Second Amendment any other way than to ratify an
One of the biggest debates concerning gun control is what the Constitution has to say about it. The second amendment of the United States Constitution clearly states that citizens have the right to bear arms. This means
Have you ever thought about our right to bear arms? The second amendment of the Constitution states that we Americans have the right to carry guns. I agree with our nation’s founding fathers. We do have a right to bear arms.