Ethical Compass Definition

Ethics can be defined as a set of moral principals that can be used to make ethical decisions and a guide solving difficult situations (Dufrene et al., 2004). They are driven

According to Merriam-Webster, ethics is defined as an area of study that deals with ideas about what is good and bad behavior. Some would argue that definition is rather vague. A more complete understanding of ethics would suggest that it is more than just an area of study but rather a way of life; moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior. If one is ethical and has good moral standards, it is usually seen in that person. Simply put, ethics could be considered the standards of behavior as to which society accepts.

　　As far as I understand, a moral compass is one of the most fundamental guides not to lose our own value standards when we face with complex moral/ethical challenges. One of the benefits of a moral compass is that it concisely and scholarly integrates the complex moral concepts into an intuitive scheme. In my opinion, we can use a moral compass as a personal pillar for communicating about own values and co-creating new value-sets with other stakeholders.

There is no such thing as “absolute good” but “good for”. Whenever I meet my defining moment, I think about the question, “Whose good should I be serving?” I am not saying to evaluate whose interests are more valuable, but to evaluate whose interests are more important TO ME. There are three principles for me to evaluate different interests. The first is the interest’s indirect impact on the third party. For example, the police are investigating a theft and I know who the thief is. I must

There is a difference between having a good or strong moral compass and being a good person. No matter how much you believe in justice or equality or anything else, as long as you don’t actively follow that compass, you can’t honestly call yourself a good person. In fact, that might even make you worse; you know something is wrong but you do it anyway. On one hand, I like to think that I believe in truth, justice and the equality of all God’s children, but in reality, even if I do believe this, I don’t change my actions to fit my own code.

Ethics means doing what one believes is the right and best choice for them and what is right for me might not be right to others. Virtues, responsibilities, obligations, and beliefs all contribute to how people see and analyze things. As individuals we have personal values and beliefs that are a part of who we are as a person. Some of these values and beliefs are things that are learned from our parents, grandparents and other individuals that influence our lives. We also acquire values from some of the things that we have experienced in our life.Values can be energizing, motivating and inspiring. As I reflect on my personal code of ethics, I feel I base my decision making process on Virtue Ethics. Along with taking full accountability for my behavior and conduct, and taking into account the circumstances of each problem in the decision I am about to make, While considering how this decision will impact the present time and future. In able to do all this I must lastly educate myself about the vast world around me.

I disagree with what the patient said about that Ten Command which say talks about Thou shall not kill or murder, I feel what good of life the mother can give the fetus if she cannot find food to eat for herself. I feel like giving the fetus a chance to live is like punishing the mother for being irresponsible. The mother should be given a second chance to change her life and be a better person. This might seem cruel but it is what I feel. I also feel that Thous shall kill commandment was specific about fighting battle in the war with weapons, and it did not say nothing about abortion. My ethical position is subjectivist which base personal considerations, and individual values. The part from patient that is conflict with my perspective is

I define ethical as behaving in a morally correct way that does not harm or offend anyone. Implying that as long as my actions are not considered dangerous or detestable, especially when it is intentional. The way that people perceive you, even in a moral or ethical aspect, affects the way others interact with you both professionally and personally. If you an individual that is viewed to be unethical, it is most conceivable that you will not have a vast majority of the general public that is willing to be associated or enter business with you as well.

Ethics refer to the values that guide a person, organization or society - - the difference between right and wrong, fairness and unfairness, honesty and dishonesty.

Ethics is defined as a branch of philosophy involved with examining the oldest controversy of what is ultimately right and wrong. What we do, what we think or basically how we live, is a determining factor in how ethics is viewed in daily functions. Majority of human beings tend to view the action of a person more defining, when it comes to negative behavior. There is another aspect to consider valuable in determining a person’s ethical foundation as well. Inaction of a party allowing any negative behavior under any circumstance can be considered just as bad as committing the actual act. It is vital that utilizing the resources to become more aware of unethical and ethical thinking methods, is heavily implemented in enforcement training, as well as in today’s society.

Preston (1996) describes ethics as being concerned with “what is right, fair, just or good; about what we ought to do” (Cooper, p. 1-2). Preston’s definition is succinct and to the point. Ethics really is about allowing what is right or just to shape our beliefs and guide our actions.

The article Leadership is About Emotions interests me because it talk about emotional intelligence. I believe that this begins by knowing yourself. What motivates you? What drives you to want to lead? The ethical and moral compass of a person is what directs me toward true leaders. Gandhi, Mandela, MLK, Cesar Chavez, Rosa Parks, President Obama, Maya Angelou, et al, are examples of fearless conviction and personal sacrifice supporting civil rights. Throughout the history of our planet, we have experienced such leaders, including our new Pope. Civil Rights’ issues are gut-wrenching, mind-soul connections that pierce one’s heart, and internal moral compass. However, today that moral compass is frequently by-passed by an over-powering personal

Ethics is the spirit standard of a person. It controls how we behave towards what is good and bad, great and terrible, and shapes our ethical obligations and commitments. When we get to be pioneers, we expect the advantages of administration yet we likewise grasp the moral weights it conveys (Johnson, 2000). The sample utilized for this separate task would be the US military in the torment Scandal, an article via Mail and Guardian, (2004)

A professional moral compass is something everyone has and lives by. It helps assist in making decisions and is based on morals or virtues. My personal moral compass is directed by various inspirations, passions, and values that I try to live by. Compassion, loyalty, integrity, honor, faithfulness, hard work, service unto others, self-discipline, accountability, and a good sense of humor contribute to my worldview and philosophy of nursing. I try to give the same quality of care to all patients and their

Ethics is the branch of philosophy that deals with the principles correlated to human behavior concerning the rightness and wrongness of specific conduct, and to the good and bad that influences and ends those actions (Ditonary.com, 2011). In other words, ethics is the choice people effect in regards to a decision they need to achieve. Without ethics directing the choice an individual makes, moral preferences of what should or should not be done becomes irrelevant. While ethical decisions are made every day there are two different regions in which these choices are made.