Ethics : Ethics And Virtue Ethical Theory

Overall, deontology is based upon not just by following universal rules or performing what is ought to do, but by respecting human beings as rational beings as well. Deontology judges the ethical motive of an action not by its consequences, merely by the reasoning behind it.

The life of prisoners some may never know. There are those who care not to know what goes on behind that wired fence. We find that some people that are convicted of crimes that they did not commit. Some people would rather turn their heads to what actually happens in a prison institution, because they feel it is no concern of theirs. Innocent women and men face a disaster in life when they find their selves incarcerated in such facility as these. The treatment in prison facilities toward prisoners with health issues or those who develop health concerns that

Moral character is what dictates an individual 's decision making and affects their experiences throughout their life. A person 's morals can be based off one 's upbringing and environmental factors. Virtue ethics is a philosophical view that greatly supports this claim that the choices a person makes and their actions follow those choices, and display their moral character. This is more likely to be true than Kantianism because this type of ethical view is based off Immanuel Kant, a philosophical thinker whose emphasizes that his writings and beliefs influence the choices people make. However, people do what is morally acceptable in

Virtue Ethics is a theory of morality. It only takes into account the individuals themselves when distinguishing morality. As defined in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Virtue Ethics is the theory that “emphasizes the virtues, or moral character, in contrast to the approach which emphasizes duties or rules (deontology) or that which emphasizes the consequences of actions (consequentialism).” It is because of it’s seemingly “rule less” structure that the theory has shown appeal. Virtue ethics places the emphasis on the type of person performing the action as oppose to action itself. This leaves room for the importance of character and a greater emphasis on the intentions of the person rather than the consequences or rules as above stated. This also means that people can learn to improve their moral life by becoming more virtuous. Those in oppose to Virtue Ethics argue that the rules of deontology and consequentialism provide the rigid action guidance lacking in v-ethics and because of this, what is “right” or “good” is’ obliviously’ more clearly defined. Without clarity in what is right/good, how can we know what is more virtuous of a decision? In this paper is will refute the objections to virtue ethics stating that virtue ethics, (1.) Does not specify what the “right action” is and (2.) Does not provide action guidance.

The ethical theory in the reading that appeals to me the most is virtue ethics. This theory appealed to me the most because it is something that I agree with and live by. Virtue ethics supports what it means to be human. It includes the person as a whole. I use this ethical theory in everyday life. Virtue ethics is not used in a single situation; it is spread out overtime. I practice virtue ethics by showing wisdom, having courage and temperance, and avoiding vices. I feel as if virtue ethics is the ethical theory that appeals to me the most because it is something that I follow by in everyday life.

Deontological ethics are based on moral obligations, duties and rights. Rules are to guide decision making in deontological ethics. Deontological ethics have a more individualistic focus, as individuals are supposed to be treated with respect and dignity (Sexty, 2011, 7).

What is the aim of moral (ethical) theory that you learned from the reading? Elaborate on this by explaining how you think that having a clearer understanding of ethics can affect your life.

Due to the vagueness of the specific acts the friend may engage in, it is difficult to establish whether the behavior is truly ethical or unethical. However, utilizing the ethical framework of ethics of virtue will deem the friend as behaving immorally. Similarly, ethical formalism may also argue that the friend’s behavior is also unethical because there is motive. The motive is to not offend others; her actions are not solely based on being good but to please others. Although ethics of care may find the friend’s behavior to be ethical, the application of the other two ethical frameworks argues otherwise. Therefore, the friend is not engaging in ethical behavior as ethical formalism and ethics of virtues indicates.

“I would rather be a good man than a great king” said the character Thor in Thor: The Dark World. In these words we find a frightening tension. Almost everyone agrees that it is good to be ethical; this is an easy affirmation. It is much more difficult, though, when ethics is in direct opposition to success. This dichotomy- between ethics and success- will no doubt confront an engineer during a professional career of any substantial length. Can you say that you would rather be a good man than rich? Or popular? Or a successful engineer? What should happen when an engineer faces this question? One real world example that can shed some light on this problem is what is known as bid shopping. This essay will provide a thorough definition of the problem of bid shopping and the ethical dilemma surrounding it. It will then apply the ethical theories of Duty Ethics and Virtue Ethics to the question. And seek to show that bid shopping is unethical according to both ethical theories.

Virtue ethics initially emerged as a rival to deontology and consequentialism. Virtue ethics makes a claim about the main role of virtue and character in its understanding of moral life and uses it to answer such questions, "How should I live? What kind of person should I be?"

The Deontological ethics is marked by steadfastness to universal principles—for example, respect for life, fairness, telling the truth, keeping promises—no matter what the consequences (Halbert, Law & Ethics in the Business Environment. pg. 17).

To begin with, the following paper shall discuss about the theory of deontology. In accordance with the deontological theory, people should abide by their duties and obligations during their analyses on ethical dilemmas. This signifies that any individual is supposed to follow his or her duties to other individuals or the society in general since supporting an individual’s obligation is regarded as ethically correct (Hooker, 2012 191-203). For example, a deontologist will at all times be true to his promises to a certain friend and will therefore abide by the rules. A person who is

What is the right thing to do when you’re faced with corruption in the work place? Should you simply condone the behavior, participate in it, or remove yourself from the situation? Is there more at stake here than just your own interests and prosperity? This essay will look at a case study involving corruption in a local county government. In this case, Jenny must decide whether or not to expose the rampant corruption prevalent in her workplace. Should Jenny turn a blind eye thereby avoiding any negative consequences, or should she expose these actions and possibly compromise her career aspirations? In considering her case, I believe the best choice Jenny should make involves her exposing the corruption. I will argue for this position through the utilitarian theory of ethics.

According to the online guide to ethics and moral philosophy, “Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory that places the focus of right and wrong solely on the outcomes (consequences) of choosing on action/policy over other actions/policies. As such, it moves beyond the scope of one’s own interests and takes into account the interests of others” (Online n.d). In simpler vernacular, utilitarianism is the view that the morally right action is the action that increases utility or does the most good. The utilitarian view is to maximize the overall good which contrasts the typical egotistical view which puts the needs of oneself above the needs of others. In Utilitarianism, everyone’s happiness counts the same. There is no “I” before “we or you”, there is just what is best for everyone involved.

Proponents of deontological ethics do not consider consequences as important when determining whether an individual is moral or immoral. Morality is based solely on the person’s action. Several ethical theories are deontological theories.