Cloning: Ethical or Unethical?
Imagine this. You are walking down the halls of the school. You keep your head down as people walk by. You slowly go into your first class. The teacher comes around and checks your homework. You don’t have it, you haven’t done it in months. As you walk out of class you think about death. You have cancer and the doctors say it is beyond help. So you are just waiting to die. You know it will be any day now. As you walk down the hallways you see him. He is the most popular, athletic, and smartest kid in school. You see him surrounded by all of his friends. His friends don’t know, but you know. He is a clone, your clone. Your parents are waiting for you to die too. In fact it's almost like you already did. Your parents
…show more content…
Amy Coxon from Medical Ethics says “The fact that human beings are created in God's image is repeated throughout Scripture and gives us our innate value. Our value, then, does not come from our contributions to society, as the humanistic worldview touts, but rather from our identity as creatures created in the image of our loving God” which means that the Christian beliefs state that we are all made in God’s image and by cloning we are saying that we can be made by DNA and parts instead of in his image. In Genesis 1:26-27 it is written that “God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” Brian Caulfield said it perfectly when he said “The biblical view of man as a special creation in the image of God will be deconstructed, and the idea that we are no more than our genes will take life. The soul will grow cold, as fewer and fewer believe that man even has one.” Also by cloning, children aren’t being produced in the way God intended us too. The Christian beliefs state that Children are a gift from God and not something that should be manufactured. Children are supposed to be produced by a husband and a wife and be nurtured by his or her parents (Hollinger). Cloning would make it so kids would just be produced in a lab. What if a whole new race of human was developed not made by God? According to Paul Stark that could just happen. He said that …show more content…
Think back when you first learned not to touch a stove when it is still on. Even though your parents tell you not to touch it and says what will happen, you do it anyway. When you touch it, you scream out in pain. Your parents come and help you and ice the wound. You knew what was going to happen but you had to try it anyway. Which is exactly like “The Economist” says in the article “Reproductive Cloning Is Immoral”. He says “Although mammals have been cloned successfully, the process is still mysterious and riddled with problems. Attempts to clone humans would certainly involve stillbirths and sudden deaths.” The scientists know that cloning will cause deaths but they still want to try it anyway. Just like a child touching a stove, the scientists know little about cloning and the process is still mysterious. People are saying what will happen but the scientists want to try, no matter the consequences. By cloning, it will also mean bringing in identical genes which will weaken our power to adapt to different circumstances, which could put us at a threat of getting a serious disease (Rawat). Through the ages, humans have adapted to survive in different circumstances but by cloning we will no longer have that ability and if we don’t we will not be able to survive different diseases. Cloning is not as simple as it sounds. It takes several clones to be produced until one
Secondly, cloning kills another animal. Cloning takes chromosomes from an egg and destroys them. That cell was going to be a new animal. Take Dolly it took 277 tries, that is 277 baby sheep killed to make another already existing sheep. If we were to clone humans any scientist who clones is technically a murderer. Other examples is the dog Snuppy they used 97 eggs to get 3 puppies. That means 97 individual puppies dead to make a clone’s clones. This is another, more grim, reason why cloning is not a good thing.
As soon as you mention the word cloning, you are most likely to ignite a debate. This is because people are greatly divided on whether it's good or bad. A way to reach a conclusion is to look at cloning from ethical, risk, and religious perspectives. The reality is, cloning is unethical, very risky, and irreligious. The arguments I will make will hopefully convince you that cloning is not good for the future.
Another supplementary argument can be made on the topic of medical advancements made possible through the cloning process, mankind will be provided with organs and cells with which human’s lives will be saved. If a person needs an organ transplant the normal means of transplantation would involve the removal of an organ from another person. This organ could be rejected and many complications could arise, often with deadly repercussions. Human cloning would involve using the person’s own cells that could be cloned to produce a healthy, normal organ for use in the person. Through this process, there would be no
While there appears to be many advantages for the continuation of cloning research, there are other drawbacks that may negatively impact the society in the future. Cloning may reduce genetic variability by producing populations that have the same genetic make-up. This population would be susceptible to the same diseases and could potentially be wiped out by a single strain of virus. Such a result could be catastrophic and devastate entire nations. Cloning in human would inevitably lead to testings on human subjects and genetic tailoring of offspring. It is plausible that scientists could alter genetic coding to produce a baby with desirable traits resulting in a ‘perfect human’ with heightened senses and sub-normal intelligence. There have been no occurrences to
There is plainly a huge measure of moral and good stresses as for human cloning. Human life is acknowledged to be important and blessed. Cloning certainly is now and again successful the principal gone through, which infers that human creating leaves will fail miserably. Most would concur that cloning is like murder or manslaughter in any occasion. For the people who don't assume that life is holy, it is basically tissue being disposed of. Cloning is hostile. The most vital piece of a man is their soul, soul or psyche and cloning does not enable one to accomplish this, it rather enables one to endeavor to accomplish some hereditary standard. There is no hobby for cloning, it is inhumane to the point that there are people on this planet with to a great degree cruel desires and human cloning would take into account military utilize. For instance, a country that could clone people could make a massive outfitted power that could attempt to expect control distinctive countries and provoke boundless wars of emotionless men. Individuals should be made through an exhibition of love and not a show of science. One that is cloned can never again be seen as a man, as your identity isn't generally essentially yours; you are giving it to someone else. Another case for instance, if mental oppressor seats had the ability to clone then the world would be an extensively all the more startling spot reliably in fear of being ambushed at any dark time. This, and in addition human cloning could
While some believe cloning to be acceptable others feel equally strongly that human cloning is completely wrong. With the state of the science as it is at the moment it would involve hundreds of damaged pregnancies to achieve one single live cloned baby. What is more, all the evidence suggests that clones are unhealthy and often have a number of built-in genetic defects, which lead to premature ageing and death. It would be completely wrong to bring a child into the world knowing that it was extremely likely to be affected by problems like these. The dignity of human life and the genetic uniqueness we all have would be attacked if cloning became commonplace. People might be
There’s a perception that, within some of the more radical religious circles, a cloned human, should this ever actually be possible, would be considered to be a “lesser” human than one that is naturally reproduced. The idea too, that a human created outside of the natural processes of reproduction would be considered an “abomination”
Cloning is by itself a straightforward scientific process it is only when you add the Human element that it gets complicated. By default man believes in a god or higher power and the act of man creating life is seen by some as an attempt to play god. Some people may also have other questions such as who would, in theory, own the cloned life, or is the clone really any different from the real thing. Cloning is questioned because it redefines the relationship between man, god, and life. There can be many arguments made for or against cloning with many of them starting with a few central questions is it okay for man to play god? Should we mess with life? When do we stop?
“Cloning is a return to asexual reproduction and bypasses the caprice of the genetic lottery and random shuffling of genes” (Hardy, Pg.3). Cloning is taking DNA from another organism and inserting the DNA into anther organism, so they look and act the same. Cloning can lead to many terrible problems such as, early death, rights issues, and devaluing human life.
The first problem that human cloning encounter is it is one of unethical processes because it involves the alteration of the human genetic and human may be harmed, either during experimentation or by expectations after birth. “Cloning, like all science, must be used responsibly. Cloning human is not desirable. But cloning sheep has its uses.”, as quoted by Mary Seller, a member of the Church of England’s Board of Social Responsibility (Amy Logston, 1999). Meaning behind this word are showing us that cloning have both advantages and disadvantages. The concept of cloning is hurting many human sentiments and human believes. “Given the high rates of morbidity and mortality in the cloning of other mammals, we believe that cloning-to-produce-children would be extremely unsafe, and that attempts to produce a cloned child would be highly unethical”, as quoted by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Since human cloning deals with human life, it said to be unethical if people are willing to killed embryo or infant to produce a cloned human and advancing on it. The probability of this process is successful is also small because the technology that being used in this process is still new and risky.
If a random individual were asked twenty years ago if he/she believed that science could clone an animal, most would have given a weird look and responded, “Are you kidding me?” However, that once crazy idea has now become a reality, and with this reality, has come debate after debate about the ethics and morality of cloning. Yet technology has not stopped with just the cloning of animals, but now many scientists are contemplating and are trying to find successful ways to clone human individuals. This idea of human cloning has fueled debate not just in the United States, but also with countries all over the world. I believe that it is not morally and ethically right
Imagine a future where humans are manufactured, a future where humans are created by science, a future where humans are the new lab specimen. Human cloning is like opening Pandora's Box, unleashing a torrent of potential evils but at the same time bringing a small seed of hope. No matter how many potential medical and scientific benefits could be made possible by human cloning, it is unethical to clone humans.
Beginning with the moral argument, one must understand reproductive freedom. Most cloning activists say that reproduction, or the lack there of, is a natural freedom given to people (C). Restricting human cloning would be a violation of that right. Just as people can choose not to reproduce using contraception, abortion, or abstinence, people should be allowed to use all means possible within their ability to reproduce, such as through cloning and in vitro fertilization (C). Cloning is the application of this right specifically (C). Another benefit of cloning is the ability to clone someone who has died to console those who are grieving over their lost loved one or to clone the DNA of a person that was known for his of her greatness. Scientists would be able to recreate these people in a new environment (C). A clone's parent may have come from
When people talk about cloning the bible is usually taken out on a person that is for cloning. Religion now a day has just decided to pretty much ignore the topic and forget about it. If humans were cloned they say that there would be a huge inbreeding problem and the world will start having even more population than what is necessary. Cloning is pretty much just a huge issue without an end; it’s something that you can argue on and on about.
When you hear the words human cloning, what comes to mind? The process of giving life to a being identical to one’s self. Or the method of reproduction that gives hope to those who have none through the established ways. Well, this may come as a shock to either side, but it is, and always will be an unnatural method of becoming a parent, and one that is not, and must not be accepted in human society. What is cloning you ask? Cloning is the process of creating multiple copies of D.N.A fragments, Molecules, even Organisms. There are those who would claim that to deny human society this option would be outrageous. But would it be so, can that really be true? The following evidence would prove their reasons otherwise, as human cloning is still