European Union Common Immigration Policy Essay

Migration policies are often designed with the sole objective of influencing international migration by either restricting or encouraging circular migration, immigration or emigration(Ripsman & Paul, 2010). Open border policies have contributed to the uncontrolled to the flow of illegal immigrants into countries and in turn generating challenges to the host countries. The fundamental basis for arguments has been whether open immigration policy or restricted immigration policy

The European Union (EU) is a unique economic and political partnership between 28 different countries. It consists of about half a billion citizens, and its combined economy represents about 20 percent of the world’s total economy (Briney, 2015). Today The European Union works as a single market, with free movement of people, goods and services from one country to another. There is a standard system of laws to be followed, and since 1999 many countries share a single currency called the Euro (Europa.eu, 2015). This essay will explore the background history of the European Union and the benefits and drawbacks of the European Union.

Migration is not a new phenomenon throughout the history of human, but the issue of migration has become more of a problem since the emerging of modern states. The distinction between immigrants and local citizens has become official with the emergence of nation-state authority and the ideas of sovereignty, citizenship and nationality. From the 19th century, the control of passport and visa has made the borders between immigrants and citizens even clearer and more identified. Today, as there are more restrictions on entering a country, states have to deal with regulating policies for immigration to control the influx of people

When you have substantial amounts of people subsiding in a general region you will always have those who agree with certain policies and those you disagree. In the case of the US immigration policy, there was a considerable amount of people who had strong opinions on America's way of running their immigration system. Many interviews, articles, speeches, and cartoons were created to show the harsh insensitivity they felt was being portrayed in immigration. A Senator of New York named Meyer Jacobstein made several thought-provoking claims towards the policy. He started with a point against the committee, “ One of the purposes in shifting to the 1890 census is to reduce the number of undesirables and defectives in our institutions. In fact,

There needs to be reform not only the issue of illegal immigration but also on legal immigration and refugee and asylum policies; the three main reforms that I will cover in this paper. Current immigrant policy allows for around 1 million immigrants allowed into this country every year. Although this may seem like a low number compared to the current population of nearly 300 million people who currently live in the unites states the

This is in reaction to a piece of legislation which has been introduced in the U.S. Congress in 2005 to ease the flow of skilled workers and immigrants into the United States in a more relaxed and welcoming manner for high- skilled foreign students.

Throughout American history, immigration policy, as Marcelo Suárez-Orozco notes, has been driven by the concern of whether or not newly admitted immigrants “would [be able to] contribute to the American project.” Current US immigration regulations, most notably, the criteria for Green Card eligibility established by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), were drafted with this same fear in mind, and are based off of two principles that may be summarized as: family unification and talent attraction. Though there is much to be said on the topic of family unification, and the value of the family unit itself is a point of contention, for the sake of evaluating immigration criteria, this paper will take for granted that family unification is a desirable principle for establishing immigration criteria. Accordingly, the focus of this paper will be on the principle of talent attraction in immigration policy, the specifics of which are laid out by the INA as follows:

Illegal immigration is the movement of individuals from a country to another violating the goal country’s terms and conditions. The relative inexpensiveness and expanded simplicity of travel aggravated by the upgrades in data have prodded to a huge degree the universal unlawful migration around the world in late decades. Illegal immigrant may cross the borders by water, land, or air. Also illegal immigration may take a legal form at first, then immigration may take a legal form at first, then it turns into illegal. This happens when someone’s visa expires and he keeps living in the host country. In countries or states where a high economic and social level exist, and where immigrants seek for going there, the negative effects of illegal migration can be felt since there will exist larger contact area between natives and illegal aliens.

An integral issue within the European Union and the refugee crisis has been the Schengen Area travel agreement, as State control over the flow

Sweden has served as one of the leading countries in terms of humanitarian efforts as sees both asylum and enlargement policy as a tool within the EU to promote human rights. Sweden maintains a quota of 1,900 refugees annually, higher than any other member state, and calls for other EU member states to increase their quotas to match based on national population and economic capability (“Major Issues”). New programs to modify and attempt to coordinate immigration policy have been supported by Sweden. The Stockholm Program refocuses EU efforts to combat illegal immigration and provide greater support and assistance of the external border nations such as Italy and Greece (Collett).

6). “The EU member states have certainly been wary of ceding too much of powers up to the EU, creating a de facto European space of 27 different approaches to migration policy, allowing only for minimum harmonization” (Weinar, 2011, psl. 6-7). That clearly shows that migration is very sensitive policy and is strongly influenced by political decisions within member states.

European Union was formed with a lot of expectations. Despite closeness and similarities, the various nations of the European continent fought bitter wars for thousands of years within themselves. After the devastating World War II, finally everyone saw the light and decided to give a chance to peaceful coexistence. However, EU’s path hasn’t been smooth. Many critical economic as well as political problems have emerged throughout the last decade, raising questions about its credibility.

Immigration to the European Union The EU has to decide how to deal with immigration. The European Union allows it's citizens to move freely within it's borders, and also work in any member country. It is also relatively safe and has a democratic government, which makes the laws and regulations, the countries within it are quite highly developed and successful, and provide benefits to needy citizens. It may not be perfect, but compared to other countries there are many opportunities for a 'good life' in the EU.

The EU previously known as the European Community can be defined as a unique partnership between 28 European member-states operating as the world’s largest single market. The union originated in 1957 through its successor – the European Economic Community (EEC) which at the time had six members. In 2013, the market had a population of around 505 million people and accounted for 23% of global Gross Domestic Product (GDP), amounting to €13.08 trillion (European Immigration Service, 2014).

The European Union (EU) is an intergovernmental union of European states composed of 28 countries. The EU’s emphasis is to encourage economic and social harmony between nations.