Evaluation Of A Program Evaluation

First, would look at my measurement method to make sure that it is reliable and valid. Making sure that the measurements are representing the people and the program accurately, enough sample size is use to represent the program, and make sure there is no participants contamination. Second, the time from when the program started and when the evaluation process starts can also show that the program have no impact. It takes a long time for programs to work out the kink and bumps along the way and sometimes having an evaluation conducted within a year will not show the program at its full potential. There is also the sleeper effect where the program will not show impact until a much later time. Having an open and clear communication with the stakeholders will let me know what they are looking in the program evaluation so that I can focus on those aspects to make sure I use accurate

Clegg and Smart (2010) noted that the term outcome measurement process is often interchangeable with achievement, goal, objective and indicator. Furthermore, Clegg and Smart (2010) went on to identify these terms, goals, outcomes present as essential elements to assist in identification of relevant data for program evaluation. Definitions of terms recognizes that goals are a broad statement of the ultimate aims of the program, outcomes are the changes in the lives of recipients, organization communities and those impacted by the program, and indicators indentifies specific, measurable information that can be collected or tracked to show that outcomes have occurred (Clegg & Smart, 2010).

The Morningside center is an afterschool program designed for at-risk youth. The Department of Human Services is requiring an evaluation component for all future contracts. Marian is in search of an evaluation program to show that Morningside center is achieving the right goals for the adolescents that attend the program. As a staff member, I suggested in the meeting that the best evaluation program to use would be the target-problem scaling. As I mentioned above, the target-problem scaling is a method of evaluating changes that take place over time. (Kirst-Ashman & Hull, 2015) It is also a process where the problem is identified, a plan takes place, and changes in the target problem are measured. (Kirst-Ashman & Hull, 2015) First off, I think this method would work best because the Department of Human Services is requiring a evaluation, which means a evaluation of the program has to take place to see if there is a problem. The second reason why I would use this method, I think this method would work best because in this method it evaluates change over time. The method will be able to determine if this program at Morningside has helped and made improvements in the adolescent’s lives. The third reason why I think this method is best because, it uses a target-problem change scale. This scale is implemented to view

Hypertension (HTN) is a chronic illness that serves as a main risk factor for cardiovascular disease (Hanus, Simoes, Amboni, Ceretta, & Tuon, 2015). Although medication can manage HTN appropriately, lifestyle modifications make a substantial difference as well. However, many patients go through behavior stages in which he or she contemplate on making the necessary changes to improve their health. One solution to the problem is the development of an educational Hypertension Intervention and Follow-Up program (HIFP). Studies have shown that active educational interventions that incorporate small groups are more effective than passive delivery of educational materials (Pimenta, Caldiera, & Mamede,

Program evaluations have made contributions to the Mental Health field for many decades. In the past program evaluations have been conducted outside the scope of a traditional Marriage and Family therapy framework. Sprenkle (2003) elaborates that MFT’s have been trying to move towards evidence-based research and evaluations. Trying to find the balance between evidence based and a systematic approach. What is also an area that poses some challenges is counselors and therapists trying to implement programs into existing organizations (Sprenkle, 2003). Program evaluations are able to provide useful information to MFT’s to aid in making improvements (Mertens & Wilson, 2012). Merton & Wilson (2012) explain that evaluations may also interfere

A program evaluation offers a way to determine if adjustments are needed to improve upon the project in order for it to remain successful. Furthermore, the project evaluation team will analyze and measure each component of the outcome, input, and process in order to clarify the program’s objectives and goals. Thus creating a framework of evaluation methods and questions in addition to setting up a timeline for the evaluation activities will assist in the evaluation (CDC, 2011; HRSA, n.d.; McGonigle & Mastrian, 2015). The goal of outcome measures is to describe the overall performance of the process; therefore, outcome measurement will determine the program cost-effectiveness, attribution, and efficiency (CDC, 2012; HRSA, n.d.; McGonigle & Mastrian, 2015). There will be additional evaluation concerning the input measures, which are the resources that were put into the process. Lastly, the appraisal of process measures will provide data regarding the performance each course of action involved in the implantation of the project (HRSA, n.d.). After a thorough evaluation of the project, recommendations and the dissemination of results will be prepared and

While several aspects of the program can be evaluated, given the newness of the program, many outcome shave not been evaluated. Additionally, some outcomes have yet to actually occur. Nonetheless,

To truly understand the success or failure of a program, evaluations must be done. There are several ways to evaluate a program. For instance, a survey could be given to each client after they discharge from the program or checking on the offender two months after they discharge is a way to evaluate the outcome. Also, a stop to look at the direction the program is headed is a way to evaluate. If the program is starting to go in the opposite direction of the goals and objectives, then it would be time to revamp the program and get a fresh start. “Process/implementation evaluation determines whether program activities have been implemented as intended. (cdc.gov).” This shows that goals and objectives hold a significant function in designing a

3. The third key point that I took away from the evaluation was the importance of developing a performance evaluation system. The evaluation system is a key component that assists to “assess both short-term and long-term outcomes for participants in the program, including educational and social outcomes” (Bania et al., 2014, p. 5). I learned that when the system is implemented effectively, it ensures accountability and promotes growth.

Various researchers have focused on simply just evaluating the impact these programs have on its participants and if they have been implemented as planned by the relevant stakeholders. For example, the purpose of Esbesen and Osgood (1999) national evaluation of the GREAT program is to compare between students who participated in the intervention to those who did not take part in the 13 lessons offered by GREAT. Additionally, Reddy and Goldstein (2001) conduct a program evaluation on the program ART, but their sample is only made up by sixty adolescent males and cannot be generalizable to the United States

The development of outcome measures for counseling programs is essential in order to measure the benefits of participating in a particular program. Measuring outcomes data is crucial for the students and the program staff involved because it provides data that can be used to assess if the program is being effective or if students are benefitting from participating in the program. And if the program is not being effective, measuring outcomes data can serve to identify particular activities that are not effective, which allows for modification. Additionally, sometimes change is needed at times in order to improve the effectiveness of the program. Programs are usually funded through some sort of federal or state funding. However, in order to prove the value of your program to the funders, the

Melinda Moore is the owner of M K Associates, a program evaluation and research firm. Formerly, Ms. Moore was a Senior Associate of bother the URSA Institute, and Polaris Research and Development. She has over twenty years of consulting experience in San Francisco, CA and Washington, DC. She is skilled in survey research, program development and design, quantitative and qualitative data analyses, evaluation, organizational analysis, and training and technical assistance to public and private agencies. Ms. Moore is experienced in the design and conduct of program evaluation and public policy research. She has served as Principal Investigator and Project Director for a variety of state, local, and national contracts in such diverse fields as

The evaluation of a program can be simple and informal or complex and very formal or a combination of the two. For every program designer or manager there are benefits to program evaluation and a necessity to evaluate the program. Program evaluation tells you whether the time and effort spent in and on the program is worth it ("Why Program Evaluation is Important | National Center for Women & Information Technology," n.d.). This is a look into what program evaluation is, why a program should be evaluated, the different models of evaluation, and an in-depth look at one specific model – The Goal Free Model.

Evaluation research is offered referred to as program evaluation, which indicates a research purpose, not a specific research method (Maxfield, 2015, p. 280). The evaluation research purpose is to evaluate the effects of policies, for instance, new sentencing laws. There are many types of evaluation research, such as problem analysis, evidence-based policy, and evidence generation. The purpose of this paper is to show the important of evaluation research through an evaluation research publication.

The purpose of the evaluation is to make sure that our program as a whole is on the track to success. We want to evaluate our current problems as well as future problems we may have and see if we can solve them now rather than later. We want to make sure that our entire program is on a steady path and that we will not be blindsided by any issues that may arise. Our program rationale is a key component to developing our program as we want our goals and objectives to be clear as well as how we will identify the needs of the community that need to be met.