Examples Of Utilitarianism

“The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one.” So spoke Spock, in the 1982 film Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, and in so doing spawned both a popular catchphrase in geekdom, and a common summarization of utilitarianism. The goal of utilitarianism, quite simply, is to maximize happiness and to minimize harm (Nathanson), although this can mean that minorities in a group are ignored or injured in favor of the majority. Some argue that the benefits of utilitarianism outweigh the costs, but other say that every individual must be considered, not just the group as a whole. This isn’t the only example of philosophy and ethics in Star Trek, either, and this essay will attempt to go through quite a few examples, beginning with that

Libertarians reject Utilitarianism’s concerns for the total social well-being. While utilitarians are willing to restrict the liberty of some for the greater good, libertarians believe that justice consists solely of respect for individual property. If an individual isn’t doing something that interferes with anyone else’s liberty, then no person, group, or government should disturb he or she from living life as desired (not even if doing so would maximize social happiness). They completely disregard concern for an overall social well-being. Using a libertarian’s perspective, a state that taxes its better-off citizens to support the less fortunate ones violates their rights because they have not willingly chosen to do so. In that same context, a theory that forces capitalists to invest in people and natural capital is immoral. Nevertheless, libertarians encourage that people help those in need, as it is a good thing.

The morality of euthanasia from an extreme utilitarian perspective means acting on what’s best for the vast majority based on one’s particular actions. The morality of euthanasia is determining what is considered to be wrong and right in the eyes of someone with a utilitarian perspective.

The Active Utilitarian approach is the best philosophy of thought for justifying punishment. Active Utilitarianism’s view of punishment revolves around the idea of what brings about the best consequences or the most net good. General rules of punishment are short cuts for decisions. The Active Utilitarian does his/her best to produce the most benefit from punishment for the most people and is not constrained by rules. Active Utilitarianism can lead to ideas such as pre punishment or vicarious punishment but those ideas would be rare because of the Utilitarian’s need to produce the most good. Active Utilitarianism is the best approach and its potential flaws can be countered.

"Utilitarianism is characterized by happiness and consequential-ism... Consequential-ism in utilitarianism is in the fact that an action must be judged for its consequences on the happiness of the largest number." (utilitarian philosophy. web) When it comes down to a tough situation, what would a utilitarian do? Now in this paper I will explain exactly what a utilitarian should do in a sticky situation and also explain the reasoning for their actions. For instance, what would a utilitarian do when it came to choosing between their own child or choosing multiple people's lives? The situation would be very difficult without a doubt in mind, but the utilitarians would stick to whatever would lead to the greatest overall happiness.

(6)You should not kill an innocent (friendless but healthy) person EVEN IF by doing so (and giving his organs to several others) you could increase net happiness.

Utilitarianism is a moral theory that has long been the subject of philosophical debate. This theory, when practiced, appears to set a very basic guideline to follow when one is faced with a moral dilemma. Fundamental Utilitarianism states that when a moral dilemma arises, one should take action that causes favorable results or reduces less favorable results. If these less favorable results, or pain, occur from this action, it can be justified if it is produced to prevent more pain or produce happiness. Stating the Utilitarian view can summarize these basic principles: "the greatest good for the greatest number". Utilitarians are to believe that if they follow this philosophy, that no matter what action they take, it

The ultimate goal for sustainability professional is to better the lives of future generation. What utilitarianism is, is an act is right if and only if it produces the most goods. With that we need to be aware that as a world we have to make sure happiness is promoted to all and to the future generations in order to find justice. By having the ability balancing the justifications of what is right for this world and what is right for the people, that is how we will get to the perfect state of overall wellbeing.

As a philosophical approach, utilitarianism generally focuses on the principle of “greatest happiness”. According to the greatest happiness principle, actions that promote overall happiness and pleasure are considered as right practices. Moreover, to Mill, actions which enhance happiness are morally right, on the other hand, actions that produce undesirable and unhappy outcomes are considered as morally wrong. From this point of view we can deduct that utilitarianism assign us moral duties and variety of ways for maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain to ensure “greatest happiness principle”. Despite all of moral duties and obligations, utilitarian perspective have many specific challenges that pose several serious threats which

Utilitarianism is the ethical belief that the happiness of the greatest number of people is the greatest good. Jeremy Betham and John Stuart Mill are two philosophers that were leading advocates for the utilitarianism that we study today. In order to understand the basis of utilitarianism, one must know what happiness is. John Stuart Mill defines happiness as the intended pleasure and absence of pain while unhappiness is pain and the privation of pleasure. Utilitarians feel the moral obligation to maximize pleasure for not only themselves, but for as many people as possible. All actions can be determined as right or wrong based on if they produce the maximum amount of happiness. The utilitarian belief that all actions can be determined as right or wrong based only on their repercussions connects utilitarianism to consequentialism. Consequentialism is the belief that an action can be determined morally right or wrong based on its consequences. Just like any other belief system, utilitarianism faces immense amount of praise and criticism.

The theory of Utilitarianism states that actions should be judged as right or wrong depending on whether they cause more happiness or unhappiness. It weighs the rightness and wrongness of an action based on consequences of that action.

Utilitarianism is the argument that all actions must be made for the greatest happiness for the greater number of people (Bentham, 42). However, utilitarianism cannot always be the basis of one’s decisions due to the fact that people need to look out for their own pain and pleasure before consulting others’ wellbeing. I will first explain the arguments of the utilitarianism ideal. Then I willl explain why this argument is unconvincing. Ultimately, I will then prove why people consider their own happiness before considering others. Thus showing the utilitarianism view is implausible due to the need for people to consider their own happiness when making decisions or else they themselves will be experiencing the most pain and unhappiness.

The case I chose to apply utilitarianism to is case number three. In case three, I am working for the number one car manufacturer in the country. Our latest model the Hipster is planned to be released but has potential brake issues. These brake malfunctions could cause serious injuries from accidents due to drivers being unable to stop the vehicle. The requirement is to submit a report and let consumers know that there is a recall after the government department approves the recall. However, this recall will end up costing the company a huge amount of money, which will end up taking away from profits. If the company pretended to not knowing about the defective brakes it would save the company money. This would also put our customers at risk. The Hipster models were supposed to be held in customs while an investigation was being made. But, the Hipster models were released without any changes and certifications. Now it is my job to see if I should look more into this event based on applying the principles of utilitarianism. I will apply the thought processes of act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism in the case scenario to give a better understanding of each principle.

Utilitarianism is a limiting ethical theory that fails to grasp ethically reality. “The greatest good for the greatest number” is not ethically right in every situation. Although the majority would benefit, the minority will heavily suffer. Considering the overall consequences of our actions, the good may not always outweigh the bad, but this does mean that the good will be the ethically right thing to do. One may think they are “maximizing the overall good,” but in reality, harming many.

What is Traditional utilitarianism? Traditional utilitarianism is a philosophy of ethics that the contentment for the most population of individuals in the world is considered to be good. Ethical actions are considered proper only if the results of those efforts are more than those of the same act conducted by an agent applying a different method. The principal of the theory beholds that any benefit is ethically right if and only if the out come is the same under a different agent providing the example. The theory was brought forth by philosopher Jeremy Bentham. Under his philosophy, an action is moral if its consequence is happiness. The exact action is considered as