preview

Facial Emotion Recognition

Decent Essays

In all living societies there are complex communication system which governs the behaviours of the individuals in that society, and when societies meet and cultures cross, to resolve conflict or effectively communicate there is a high importance on the non-verbal, visual cues of communication. This imperative cross-cultural topic serves high values in various fields of psychology due to its universal importance of individuals being able to communicate where there are communication barriers and to further the understanding on human interaction especially with individuals that have innate deficits of facial emotion recognition and communication issues such as autism spectrum conditions. Which introduces the highly inexpungable concept of …show more content…

Found in the subjects from Israel, Sweden and Britain aged 5-9, clearly displayed extremely low cultural variability of facial emotion recognition between the autistic and regularly developing subjects. Also, how through both complex and basic emotion recognition autistic children had a higher deficit in the accurate detection of specific emotion, Fridenson-Hayo (2016). This can be strongly attributed through the characteristics imbedded in the autism spectrum condition in which the attention to facial expressions in integrated fractionally whereas a typically developing child integrates the expression of emotion holistically Fridenson-Hayo (2016). This lack of cultural variability is also strengthened through the study of constants across cultures in the face and emotion by Ekman and Friesen (1971), whereby highly isolated new Guinean and westerners experienced the stimulus material of pictures of facial emotion and story photographs to further replicate a real-life scenario. Very minimal cultural variance was the result of the facial emotion recognition tests. This conclusion was made in conjunction with the knowledge of how social contextual information in societies can manifest specific facial movements and thus behaviours but it does not take away from the conclusion that facial emotion recognition is primal and animalistic in nature whereby there is little to no cultural variance, Ekman and Friesen (1971). Similar confounding evidence further aligning with the universality of accurate facial emotion recognition was a later study conducted by Ekman and Friesen (1987) which found among ten highly differing countries in terms of social contextual experiences of past and present, that the accurate depiction of the

Get Access