Fear of Change, and why it keeps the world in line. The spark of revolution is implanted in the minds of people by people who want change... but not everybody wants change. People want to follow a routine. “So [they] beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.” It’s what keeps the world in order, for the most part. Of course, there will always be people that step out of ‘normal’ boundaries. There are a few individuals, that when stepping out of the norm, changed history with inventions. There are others that plunged the world into war. That’s how the world changes. Without those people, the world would be stagnant. With too many of those people, the world would be too chaotic to handle. Wars would be fought everywhere. …show more content…
“No amount of fire or freshness can challenge what a man will store up in his heart.” This means that some people just have to make a change sometimes, even if they can’t help it. Scientific abnormalities changed the world in a huge way. America sent people to the moon. JFK inspired Americans by saying “We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.” Not everyone can step out of the norm and inspire people the way he did with that speech. Some can’t even put their inspirational and out-of-the-norm thoughts into words, thinking “It is impossible to say just what [they] mean!” Another way that the world has changed from people disrupting the norm is the American revolution. The revolution that created the very same country that set man on the moon. Not only did the revolution create the most powerful country in the world economically and militarily, it inspired other people everywhere to disrupt the norm and implanted the idea of revolution from tyranny for a better way of life. Of course, as I said before, bad things can also come of people disrupting the status quo, the same way Germany did by starting a world war in 1939. Not a very good way of disrupting the world... but still a way. Another cause for disruption of the status quo is urgency. Some …show more content…
Most people might not even think it’s worth it to disrupt their lives to go out and do something abnormal, the same way some question if disrupting the norm would be worthwhile at all. There’d be too much disorder, and people wouldn’t be able to live a normal life. Everyone would be rebelling and changing things. The society we live in can’t really function when everyone is doing that. Of course, sometimes all it takes for the world to change is an average Joe. Some believe change is good, others the opposite, meaning that “Calmness wasn’t an end in itself.” They have to do something with themselves. Conflicting interests like that are oftentimes the reason that the world is the way it is, and why it will stay that way. “There are only the pursued, the pursuing, the busy and the
Conformity, it’s something everyone deals with, even if they do not realize it. Although, what happens when conformity takes control over everything? What if the world was stripped of individuality, no citizen has any rights to hold on to, while not being able to think for one’s self. That is an image what it would be like if everyone in the world were to conform to a restricting society. Just think of all of the advances in technology the human race has come up with in the last ten years alone. None of that would have been possible in a society where no one can go above another person's IQ level. This is the world the characters in Ayn Rand’s novella Anthem live in. The reasons that total conformity is dangerous is because individuality is not possible, no family history, and advancement would not be possible.
Many nations across time and the world have experienced a revolution. From the American revolution to the French revolution, history has proven conflict can engage a nation at any moment. Tanter explains that two possible scenarios, changes in the economic development and the level of education are likely to cause revolutions (Tanter 264). A revolution can be composed of a group of individuals who are willing to make the ultimate sacrifice in exchange for change in the existing
The author, Logan Feys in his article, ¨The Sociology of Leopard Man¨, discusses the topic of society and being a nonconformist. He claims that people should be psychologically free and strong enough to live independently, leaving society and entering society on their own terms. He supports his claim by first comparing abnormal people and ¨normal¨ people. For example, in the article he states, “Plenty of weird people do have serious mental problems. But so do plenty of ¨normal¨ people.¨ (Feys 1). He then goes on to explain the dangers of conforming to society. ¨Conformity can be seen as the world's most common but dangerous psychological disorder. Living in society, we are under constant pressure to surrender our individuality to the will of
All throughout history, there have been plenty of revolutions. They have had both negative and positive impacts on society and the economy. The Industrial Revolution by far, has been the most impacting on the world. During the revolution, ingenious inventions helped to shape the revolution and influence modern technology. As well as these inventions, the Factory Act of 1833 was passed, which improved working conditions for children laboring in factories. In addition to these two things, a new time standard was created that the whole country of Britain would eventually run on. In contrast, some people believe political revolutions, like the Haitian and French, were more evolving.
In the article “Why Bother” by Michael Pollan, the main point focus around the idea that humans tend to be careless to help our planet that is on the verge of falling. As humans, we become blind to the issues that surround us and few believe in change. The idea to help or be helped is unlikely especially when many people are very self-center. Michael Pollan believes the problem in which change can’t be made is due to “specialization”. Wendell Berry who’s a farmer and writer once said, “the deep problem standing behind all the other problems of industrial civilization is “specialization,” which he regards as the “disease of the modern character.” (Pollan, 91). When you focus on one thing and continue to do that you began to adapt and become unaware of change. The world cannot continue to survive if there’s no ability to expand your knowledge prior to what your brain already knows.
St. John argues that when individuals fear change, it creates more problems and conflicts. However, if people were to embrace change, then this would enhance the lives of all people involved.
Throughout history, humanity has always yearned for better. When a leader, as an individual or an entire government, ceases to fuel their nation’s drive for better, the citizens take it into their own hands. From this sovereignty of the people, the idea of revolution is born. This idea has become prominent many times. One can analyze a country like France. Due to the government’s selfish actions, the third estate revolted. In countries like Brazil, Venezuela, and Mexico, the citizens were tired of strict rule from a power that is an ocean away. This caused the people in Latin America to revolt against their leader, Spain. Although the French and Latin American Revolutions both were inspired by the American Revolution and Enlightenment ideas, the French Revolution was vastly unsuccessful compared to the Latin American Revolution which brought freedom to many countries.
Fear is a feeling induced by experience, perceived danger, or watching a frightening traumatic accident. The fear responses arise from the perception of danger and ultimately a change in behaviour, such as fleeing, or hiding or from perceived traumatic events. Every person has fears and different fears may be different adaptations that have been useful in our evolutionary past. I have fears too, and sometime, I feel embarrassed to intersperse my fear with others.
Based on the information provided to me from the text, and my own personal thoughts, I am a firm believer that we are in a revolution at this day in age, and will always continue to be in a revolution so long as the human race is here. I believe that being human, means you’re always changing and society is always revolving. As there are countless revolutions occuring at this time... I will like to state a few that I have personally witnessed. These are: a political revolution, describing the never ending changes in the United States Government; and a cultural revolution, a fairly old revolution that has been gaining momentum in the past few decades.
One man, or woman, alone cannot cause change. They need a group to stand with them and help them win their battle. There is a very good chance that there is at least one person, if not more, with something to lose. So it isn’t one person with nothing to lose that will cripple society, but a group of people standing up against what’s wrong in their world, united for their cause, that is the most dangerous thing to any
Throughout history there have been many important revolutions that have help to shape society as it is today. There are different causes, from political to religious, economic to social. Any revolution affects those in society, and creates changes for the people in the society. There are three important revolutions that took place in the late 18th century that changed the world for the better. The French Revolution, the American Revolution, and the Industrial Revolution all took place in the late 1700s. Although each had a different purpose, they all lead to a better way of life for many. The French and American Revolutions are examples of some which are brought about and enforced solely by the people. Although they had different reasons
It requires a basic humility. We can never be sure what effect our individual contributions will have. We may never know their significance. One person or a small group can influence the entire world. Chaos and butterfly power provide for the impossible.
While change can be viewed as a positive thing, it can also be negative, but above all else it can be a scary occurrence. Sometimes we find ourselves desiring to break free from collectivism, desiring to be individual. But often times, we cannot speak up, we cannot do anything to break free. We feel small and confused and afraid. But what is it we are afraid of? Fear of Change. We become used to living in a collective and oppressive society where we are held back and restricted since we are afraid of what could happen if we gain freedom to be unique. Freedom to be creative. Could total anarchy erupt? Could murder occur, due to rage and confusion built up inside of us? Regardless, it is the fear of what could happen, fear of the unknown and of the changes which could come with a new
Through history, there has been revolutions that have affected the world in many different ways. There is two kind of revolutions political revolutions ,that are changes to the government, and non political revolution, that are intellectual, economic or social changes. The non political revolutions are important because they had shaped the way we all think, act and work in the actuality. Some of those non political revolutions are the enlightenment that was a change in the way that everybody thinked; and the Industrial revolution in Europe that changed the way goods were produced.
Culture of Fear, by Frank Furedi, is a book that looks at how widespread fear impacts Western cultures like the United States and Great Britain. Frank Furedi believed that society tends to panic too much, as we actually enjoy "an unprecedented level of safety." I admit that Frank Furedi's novel is based upon a novel concept, and an interesting one at that. However, Frank Furedi comes off to me as little more than a fear monger and an intellectual elitist. His book, to me, seems redundant more often than not. But sometimes part of college is learning about points of view that you may not agree with, so I tried to maintain that perspective when I read the book.