Feeding Of The 5000 Essay

Additionally, the structure of the Gospel breaks down into the three sections previously mentioned. Next, the introductory section on the theology of the Gospel highlights 4 different theological themes seen throughout Matthew: Israel and the Gentiles, Christology, The Fulfillment of Scripture, and Discipleship and the Church. Regarding the purpose and audience of the Gospel, Blomberg notes much debate surrounds this topic, but concludes, however, that regardless of the debate the author of Matthew appears to address “. . . a Jewish-Christian audience with distinctively Jewish-Christian concerns” (Blomberg 1992:37). Next, the introduction notes the sources through which scholars believe the author of Matthew gleaned come of his material, specially the material that also resides in Mark and Luke. Blomberg discusses that most scholars believe Matthew used Mark as well as an unknown source, which scholars often refer to as the Q-Hypothesis. Regarding the date of the Gospel

The two Gospels that I 've decided to compare are Luke and John. Luke is considered a Synoptic Gospel and presents the human side of Jesus. Luke takes us through the longer version of his birth and his childhood and focuses on the humanity of Jesus. There was a debate in this story whether or not Jesus was human and raised many question to potential followers. Many said that Jesus was just a spirit but by reading Luke, there was great detail of his humanity. Luke directed this book directly to Gentiles and focused more on the teachings and miracles that Jesus created rather than the law. Stated in the text, Luke’s Gospel also depicts more clearly the way in which the proclamation of the kingdom of God and the accompanying mighty works of Jesus brought the benefits of salvation to marginalized people. Luke also highlights the concern of Jesus for the materially poor, and the duty of his followers to be free from love of possession and to give generously to those in need. John was considered a different story in the Bible and in the Gospel. It was the last story of the Gospels and does not repeat any of the other stories from Matthew, Mark, or Luke. John had the opportunity to see the gospel and its affect it had and based that off the

Bible Scholar David Garland points to two possibilities as to why Mark’s Gospel is written in a narrative style or form. Garland believes the Gospel of Mark either came from an oral story circulating in the Jerusalem church or it came from a firsthand account of the Apostle Peter. Some bible scholars point to the idea that the Gospel of Mark was narrativized, so it could be heard rather than be read silently. Bible scholar Robert Tannehill believes the Gospel of Mark may even have been collected and delivered orally before it was ever written down. Michael Licona believes if a certain text appears in all three Synoptics, the Gospel of Mark is the most likely source for Matthew and Luke’s accounts. Licona notes that this rule should not be held hard and fast, since Mark may also have been using an oral story while Matthew and Luke choose another source or omitted material where it differs in each of their Gospel’s. The Apostle Peter seems to be the eyewitness account which Mark narrates into a single unified story, which centers around a single central figure Jesus and a group of His closest companions. If the author of Mark was using an oral story to write his gospel from, this would definitely explain its narrative style.

The common belief among source critics is that, the Gospel of Mark is the oldest and Matthew and Luke used his gospel along with an unknown source to write their Gospels. Evidence supporting this view make the makes four points. First, the Luke’s Gospel is contains approximately half of Mark’s information and Matthew’s Gospel encompasses almost all of Mark’s views. Second, Mark’s words are used verbatium Matthew and Luke. Third, Matthew and Luke follow the same sequence of events as Mark. Finally, Matthew and Luke sometimes reword Mark’s uncomfortable passages of scripture to allow smooth transitions and ease of understanding.[5]

The gospel of Luke is an in-depth story of Jesus life, his purpose, his vision and his sacrifice; from birth to death Luke does an amazing job painting a beautiful picture of Jesus, showing his ancestry, portraying him as a human just like you and I. Luke does tell a lot of the same things as Matthew and Mark but a much more in depth description and explains Jesus identity, his journey, the religious leaders of the time, and his resurrection and crucifixion.

There are many similarities between the Gospel of Luke, Mark, and Matthew. But one difference is the way in which they are written. Luke unlike the other two begins his Gospel with a introduction called a historiographic preface. This is a Greco-Roman literary device used by authors to express the depth of the research and scholarship included in the work. Ehrman states "they commonly refer to the sources that were at his disposal, and they not infrequently suggest that the final product of the author's labors, the volume being written on the subject." (Ehrman 96). This brings up another difference which is the style in which Luke writes. The text states that the author of the Gospel of Luke was much elequate and fluent in ancient greek

Jesus/ Loaves of fish: Jesus, Taking the five loaves and the two fish and looking up to heaven, he gave thanks and broke the loaves. Then he gave them to the disciples, and the disciples gave them to the people. They all ate and were satisfied, and the disciples picked up twelve baskets full of broken pieces that were left over. The number of those who ate was about five thousand men, beside women and children.

Now that we have uncovered some of the significance of the location of the text both in relation to the surrounding narratives, and geographically it is time to look at each of the accounts, and how they compare to one another. The account of the miracle in Mark is the longest, and most detailed of the three, and I will be exploring it first. Luke’s account is very similar to Mark’s, and in fact it is believed that Luke used Mark as the sole source for his account of the story, and simply changed the language possibly changing the meaning, and focus of the text for his Gospel , so I will look at his narrative second. Finally Matthew is the shortest, and least detailed account of this narrative containing some

I was young at the time, frolicking around, nothing to worry about. I had just got off of school. As I was running home I saw that the fishermen were out on the sea. When I got home, I grabbed about 30 coins and ran back outside. When I got to the docks, I bought a few small fish, only a half-foot long. I started my way back when I started to smell scrumptious bread in the air. I stopped by the baker to buy some bread. I bought 7 loaves. By now I was super hungry. On the way home, I saw a huge gathering of people. I stopped by to see what the commotion was about. And there he was, the Messiah. Preaching the word of God. I was both excited and scared.I tried pushing through

Before the beginning of the Passover meal Jesus gave his followers, the disciples, a lesson in humility by washing their feet. This work was normally reserved for slaves or servants of this time, but Jesus the servant leader, the guest of honor, the person of prominence and power wraps a towel around his waist and demonstrated what a servant leader looks like and does.

Sarah Alflen REL Essay Matthew's and Mark's passages share their views on the same account, but they are distinctly different for the audiences that they are writing to. Matthew's audience is Jews. He writes to them to remind them that Jesus is the Messiah because he has healed the sick, fulfills things from the Old Testament, and values faith. On the other hand, Mark's audience is mostly for Gentiles or a mixed audience.

There was a paralyzed man sitting at the pool. This man thought he could be healed by going into the pool. Jesus saw no one could help him get in so Jesus made him believe he wanted to get well. When he believed, Jesus Healed him at the Pool. This miracle was complete and instantaneous, when Jesus speaks, life happens. There were many people who began giving Testimonies about Jesus after seeing this miracle. These were Himself, God, Scripture, John, and Moses. Jesus made his way to the Sea of Galilee. Many people followed him and Jesus was going to feed them. There were 5,000 people there and 5 barley loaves and 2 fish. This was just the men that was there so there would actually be about 15,000. Jesus turned this bread into a multitude and Fed 5,000 people. Jesus was delivered in the synagogue and declared he was the bread of life. The people were driven by the physical (food), and not by the spiritual. This incident at Capernaum was called the Bread of Life Discourse. He then left and when back to Galilee but this time avoided Judea because they were trying to kill him. The disciples wanted him to go to Judea to show them the works he does, but he told them that anytime is good for them, since they are not hated by the world, but he is hated and his time will come. So instead he goes to the Feast of Tabernacles where people recognize him as both a good man and one who deceives. At

For this assignment, I chose to read the gospel of Mark from the New International Version of the Bible. I chose to read from the NIV because I have always used this version when studying, and I wanted to read a text as close to the original documents as possible. I have never read a book in its entirety in one sitting, so this was a new experience for me. The book of Mark sounded appealing to me because I have always enjoyed reading from Mark and every time I read from it something new always sticks out to me and changes me.

The gospel of mark contains many important passages about the life and teachings of Jesus. The pericope: Feeding of the 5000 is one of the most important passages of Mark. The importance of the passage can be seen in the historical, religious, and literary context. A deeper understanding of the importance can be seen in the verse by verse analysis of the passage.

The teachings of Jesus focused primarily on the "the kingdom of God" and were usually relayed through parables drawing on familiar images from agricultural life. He rebuked the hypocrisy of some Jewish leaders and taught the importance of love and kindness, even to one's enemies. Jesus' popularity grew quickly, but so did opposition from local leaders. Roman rulers were uncomfortable with the common perception that he was the Messiah who would liberate the Jews from Roman rule, while Jewish leaders were disquieted by Jesus' shocking interpretations of Jewish law, his power with the people, and the rumor that he had been alluding to his own divinity. In the Gospels, Jesus repeatedly suggests to his disciples his end is near, but they do not fully understand or accept the idea. The clearest expression of this is at the "Last Supper," which took place on the night before his death. All four Gospels record that Jesus shared bread and wine with his disciples, asking them to "do this in remembrance of me." Christians celebrate this event in the sacrament of the Eucharist, or Communion. On this evening Jesus also predicts that one of them will betray him, which is met with astonishment and denial. But that very night, Jesus' fate was sealed when Judas Iscariot, one of his disciples and possibly the group's treasurer, led Roman soldiers to Jesus for 30 pieces of silver. As they arrested Jesus, the ever-colorful Peter defended his master with a sword, slicing off