formidable world in which we live. Whether one believes that life has a preordained meaning from the origin of a God or if we are just living matter sitting on a globe spinning in the universe will influence how one lives his or her life. There are different approaches to how to cope with the challenges of life: Albert Camus with influences of Jean Paul Sartre paints an atheist existentialist picture in The Plague, and Kelly Clark with themes of Soren Kierkegaard, in When Faith Is Not Enough, describes
Camus published “L'Etranger” or “The Stranger” during World War II, and it became one of his most discussed works in Europe (Rhein). The popularity of Camus’ work can be attributed to the overall feelings in Europe brought by the havoc of war that had left the lands marred. Many people throughout Europe were hurt by the war and began to question the point of life amidst such destruction. This resonates with the modern audience as well because “The Stranger” continues to play on themes that can be
The Contemporary Relevance of Albert Camus ABSTRACT: After 350 years of continual social transformations under the push of industrialization, capitalism, world-wide social revolutions, and the development of modern science, what reasonably remains of the traditional faith in divine transcendence and providential design except a deep-felt, almost 'ontological' yearning for transcendence? Torn between outmoded religious traditions and an ascendant secular world, the contemporary celebration of
examine Socrates and David Hume. It will be demonstrated that Socrates’ actions in Plato’s Phaedo and Apology constitute philosophical suicide by finding sanctuary, giving hope, and appealing to a god. Alternatively, Hume’s actions/claims in the Dialogue Concerning Natural Religion, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, and Of Miracles conform with Camus’ absurd logic because of his constant skepticism and denial of an escape. My aim is to demonstrate that although Socrates’ actions are deemed as
declares that since he cannot understand or forgive injustice he will reject God, preferring to stand with the wicked rather than accept the suffering as part of his Lord's perfect plan. Camus seems to advocate this form of atheism too in the section on metaphysical rebellion in The Rebel and also in The Plague, where the protagonist, Dr. Rieux, concludes, "since the order of the world is shaped by death, mightn't it be better for God if we refuse to believe in Him and struggle with all our might
an action is completely out of place, yet it happens as though it is ordinary and everyday. Looking back from a modern perspective, Highmore states that “Surrealism’s attention to everyday life stands the everyday on its head” (Highmore 49), meaning that the Surrealists accomplished their task of upsetting the normal and confusing the ordinary. However, Highmore also notes the second accomplishment of Surrealism when he says, “There is a danger that Surrealism’s attempt to make the familiar (the
Study 9) Significance of the Study 10) Conclusion CHAPTER - I Introduction: The main aim of the present research is to study how Pragmatics works as a torch in the appreciation of literature. Pragmatics is associated with the study of meaning as communicated by a speaker and interpreted by a listener. This type of study necessarily involves the interpretation of what people mean in a particular context and how the context influences what is said. It requires a consideration of how the