Food Labeling Research Paper

Research shows that when such information is given, customers use it to limit the way they eat. This can consume an average loss of calories than they typically did before labeling. This trend poses increased risk, not just in terms of calories, but in terms of unhealthful ingredients such as fat and sodium. According to the passage, "the U.S. government agrees that restaurant meals should be labeled. It is part of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, which requires that standard menu items include information on nutrition 1". This poses that fast food places and restaurants should in fact label information, not only for ones own health but it is required.

Millions of restaurants would waste money and time year round if they had to incorporate labels to their menu. The employees would have to encounter every ingredient in the dish. Then they would need to add all of the calories together just to see how much is in the whole entire dish. What if they wanted to add an ingredient? Then that would be twice the trouble of adding them up a second time. According to the passage, "We Don't Need Labels'', "Foods for home consumption have been labeled for decades; but according to consumer research, that information has had a minimal effect on sales." This gives an explanation on how wasting money on labels does not effect the sales of that item or dish.

First of all, if restaurants had food labels, people would be eating a lot healthier. In one study stated by the passage "Label the Meals", it showed that the one fourth of people who use this information when it is available use it to limit what they eat, and they eat, on average, 400 fewer calories than people who do not use the label. While the passage "We Don't Need Labels" states that people who said they ate a healthier meal knowing this really didn't, they already knew what they were eating, therefore, they knew they could afford to eat there. Another thing is that, if your trying to stay fit and healthy, while exercise is important, food is the most important thing to worry about. Food is what powers you up for the day,

Do you believe restaurants should be required to label the calories ,fat content, and sodium on their menus? I agree to this controversial argument! If a law was created that required restaurants and diners around the nation to display calories and other health concerns many people would be healthier.

Some fast-food purveyors will provide calorie information on request, but even that can be hard to understand (Zinczenco, 2002.) The essence of Zinczenco’s s argument is that Americans are unable to be fully informed of the harm the food they consume completely inflicts their health. This backs of the writers claim, that you are unable to place the complete blame of obesity, completely on the consumer. If consumers are completely oblivious to the fact that there food labels are completely rigged, how is it even possible for the consumer to get the truth? The easy answer would be repeatedly placing the blame on the consumer, and saying they should do extensive research on the food which they eat. But in complete honesty, this is a ridiculous standard which most Americans won't bother putting time and effort into. This quote ties back into Zinczenco’s claim that the cooperation which serve such unhealthy food are at fault, for it is they who feed food that can lead to a life altering disease, without properly informing the consumer.

However, the one area of healthy living promotion is lacking and that is food information. The United States must change their source of food information; the food label must be changed. Currently the food label is inaccurate, loose in regulations, and hard to read. By changing the food label to an easier, clearer, and more accessible source of information, then the American public will have easier access to information. Furthermore, the American public will have an easier time choosing healthier options towards food.

The purpose of the nutritional labels is to inform individuals how many calories they are about to intake or how much fat does that one particular item acquire. Understanding what is incorporated in the foods that are being ingested can help people make wiser decisions on what is more healthier to maintain a proper diet. A healthy diet is very compelling in an individual's lifetime and reading nutritional labels is taking them in a satisfying path that can improve their overall diet. This solution has be around, but yet just being ignored because individuals will consume what they think is delicious and not consider how many calories are contained. The importance of having educational classes mandatory to all Americans about the deadly epidemic will not only reduce the obesity rate, but also bring the American society to its

Recently the federal government passed a law that, “requires restaurant chains with 20 or more outlets to disclose calorie counts on their food items and supply information on how many calories a healthy person should eat in a day” (Rosenbloom). By doing this it is helping to expose the nutritional information allowing the American people to be aware of what they are eating; if it is healthy or unhealthy. Many wonder if people make good decisions when it comes to which food choices they consume. People who support this new federal law believe that, “even if menu labeling does not inspire consumers to eat better, they should be told what they are putting in their mouths” (Rosenbloom). Even though the menu items are labeled it does not matter to those people that overlook it, because those people consume it

On FDA food labels, the accuracy of the amount of substances being ingested is true. An article published by FDA Consumer shows the accuracy rates of the FDA labels, “Total Carbohydrate 98%, Total Fat 96%, Sugars 95%, Calories 93%, Saturated Fat 93%, Sodium 90%, Cholesterol 80%, Dietary Fiber 80%, Calcium 80%” (Accuracy of Information on Nutrition Labels). Although these rates are not 100%, this study was done in 1996. The article goes on to state that, “Findings were based on 2,000 laboratory tests of 300 retail food products” (Accuracy of Information on Nutrition Labels). With the limited technology of the time, these are still reliable statistics. Also, it is difficult to measure the exact quantity of some of these substances because of their molecular density. With some substances being more difficult to determine the exact amounts, it would be nearly impossible to have 100% accuracy on some of them. While with this information, people have still been able to construct healthy diets. If it were not for the accuracy of these labels, there would be not be an opportunity for anyone to be healthy, or anyone to commit to a healthy lifestyle. For example, with the knowledge of certain ingredients in what I eat, I have been able to easily and healthily change my diet. Simply put, the Food and Drug Administration is honest with the public and tries to keep people healthy. However, not only does the FDA try to keep

In conclusion They need to label it because of Health,Unhealthy stuff in the food and we need to eat at home more.Those are the reasons why they should label

Overall, about 60% of Canadians are eating out one or more times per week, and nearly 40% of Canadians eat out at least a few times per week (16). Moreover, approximately 25-30% of Canadians food spending is on food eaten away from home (16). Canadian consumers face barriers to regularly dining out such as the high levels and wide variation in the calories and sodium content of foods, the large portion sizes, and misleading marketing claims on restaurant menus (16). The Nutrition Facts label, provides nutritional information for food products purchased at grocery stores, however, prior to January 1st 2017, nutrition facts such as the calorie content were not easily accessible for consumers dining at Ontario restaurants (1). Currently, Ontario is the only province in Canada to enforce a calorie labeling legislation in food service operations with 20 or more locations (4).

First of all, the fact of the matter is everyone on this earth only gets one body to either care for or destroy during their time on this earth. If that is the case and you choose to take care of it, one of the most important variables that aid you is what you consume. As it is said, “you are what you eat”. When planning a healthy diet, a person must know what they are consuming. How can a person be sure that they are achieving this goal if the food they are eating has been altered in any way? He or she cannot truly believe that they are eating healthy if they don’t know what are eating. Being healthy is a choice and there needs to be a label on all food so that the consumer knows

Of course, not every food can have a 'complete' label. But this is no excuse regarding the right of consumers to be educated and aware about the

Regarding the possibility of being a short-sighted policy, the move is useless as it is only symbolic. There have been many discussions whether or not unhealthy fast foods carry labels warning of their calorie content. McDonald’s, one of the world’s largest fast food restaurants, has implemented menu labelling to inform customers about menu items since 2012 in the United States, showing the amount of calories they put in their foods (Strom, 2012).

As you may already know labeling and nutrition have been around for a while to help us with counting how much calories we may put into our diets. Why not put it on menus when we enter in a restaurant or fast food place. Calorie labeling on restaurant menus and vending machines can help you be informed and make helpful decisions about meals and snacks. However others may say otherwise. In the debate from the passage claims that customers may like the idea of nutritional labeling, but they still do not seem to be lacking on it. Mentioning that whether or not labeling actually matters. In my state of matter I believe and agree that labeling on menus should definitely be required. To find out more about my personal point of view in this debate,