Food Labeling Research Paper

Research shows that when such information is given, customers use it to limit the way they eat. This can consume an average loss of calories than they typically did before labeling. This trend poses increased risk, not just in terms of calories, but in terms of unhealthful ingredients such as fat and sodium. According to the passage, "the U.S. government agrees that restaurant meals should be labeled. It is part of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, which requires that standard menu items include information on nutrition 1". This poses that fast food places and restaurants should in fact label information, not only for ones own health but it is required.

Zinczencko complains that unlike many other hazardous items, fast food does not come with warnings on how terrible the food is for one’s health and its future effects. He emphasizes that even if the customers were able to obtain the nutritional facts, they are not palpable, but rather obscure. He points out that the fast-food companies make the nutrition labels vague and misleading; they calculate the calories for every separate part of the meal, and they make it so the consumer must pay attention to serving size as well. He observes that the fast-food industry can get away with confusing labels because there are not any Food and Drug Administration labeling requisites (Word Smart, p. 220) covering fast food. Zinczenko complains that there is not any sort of nutritional labeling on the menus at fast-food restaurants. Now, nine years later, there are some changes, but his point is still valid. McDonald’s menu now states the calories of each meal, but as Zinczenko points out, it is very difficult to

Athens was Democraticless Democracy can be defined as the power of the people. For example, America is a democracy. Athens claimed to be a democracy. Based on recorded speeches and the Athenian Constitution they did not favor the people. In some ways they did, but there is credible evidence showing Athens was not a democracy. There are statistics, facts, and examples. For instance, in a speech by Aristotle, he states, the citizens had to vote a new citizen. Voting is unjust based on citizens unfair judgments. If the potential citizen is declined citizenship, he must have a trail. If the citizen loses, he is then sold as an Athenian slave. Both of those laws do not favor the people. It is very easy for current citizens to mistreat the system.

In Zinczenco’s view “I'd say the industry is vulnerable. Fast-food companies are marketing to children a product with proven health hazards and no warning labels. They would do well to protect themselves, and their customers, by providing the nutrition information people need to make informed choices about their products” (Zinczenco, 2002.) In making this comment, Zinczenco urges fast food

If you were to go to a restaurant, you would want to know what the nutritional values of the food were, would you not? The labels you see on bags of potato chips or a drink are called nutritional labels (also known as food labels), which show you how much calories, proteins, fats, or a lot more that the item has. In fact, the government made it illegal to make products to sell at stores without the nutritional label. Did you know that restaurants are not required by law to have a label on any of their products? The government needs to make a law to make restaurants put the nutritional values on their foods.

Millions of restaurants would waste money and time year round if they had to incorporate labels to their menu. The employees would have to encounter every ingredient in the dish. Then they would need to add all of the calories together just to see how much is in the whole entire dish. What if they wanted to add an ingredient? Then that would be twice the trouble of adding them up a second time. According to the passage, "We Don't Need Labels'', "Foods for home consumption have been labeled for decades; but according to consumer research, that information has had a minimal effect on sales." This gives an explanation on how wasting money on labels does not effect the sales of that item or dish.

Do you believe restaurants should be required to label the calories ,fat content, and sodium on their menus? I agree to this controversial argument! If a law was created that required restaurants and diners around the nation to display calories and other health concerns many people would be healthier.

Of course, not every food can have a 'complete' label. But this is no excuse regarding the right of consumers to be educated and aware about the

The purpose of the nutritional labels is to inform individuals how many calories they are about to intake or how much fat does that one particular item acquire. Understanding what is incorporated in the foods that are being ingested can help people make wiser decisions on what is more healthier to maintain a proper diet. A healthy diet is very compelling in an individual's lifetime and reading nutritional labels is taking them in a satisfying path that can improve their overall diet. This solution has be around, but yet just being ignored because individuals will consume what they think is delicious and not consider how many calories are contained. The importance of having educational classes mandatory to all Americans about the deadly epidemic will not only reduce the obesity rate, but also bring the American society to its

However, the one area of healthy living promotion is lacking and that is food information. The United States must change their source of food information; the food label must be changed. Currently the food label is inaccurate, loose in regulations, and hard to read. By changing the food label to an easier, clearer, and more accessible source of information, then the American public will have easier access to information. Furthermore, the American public will have an easier time choosing healthier options towards food.

On FDA food labels, the accuracy of the amount of substances being ingested is true. An article published by FDA Consumer shows the accuracy rates of the FDA labels, “Total Carbohydrate 98%, Total Fat 96%, Sugars 95%, Calories 93%, Saturated Fat 93%, Sodium 90%, Cholesterol 80%, Dietary Fiber 80%, Calcium 80%” (Accuracy of Information on Nutrition Labels). Although these rates are not 100%, this study was done in 1996. The article goes on to state that, “Findings were based on 2,000 laboratory tests of 300 retail food products” (Accuracy of Information on Nutrition Labels). With the limited technology of the time, these are still reliable statistics. Also, it is difficult to measure the exact quantity of some of these substances because of their molecular density. With some substances being more difficult to determine the exact amounts, it would be nearly impossible to have 100% accuracy on some of them. While with this information, people have still been able to construct healthy diets. If it were not for the accuracy of these labels, there would be not be an opportunity for anyone to be healthy, or anyone to commit to a healthy lifestyle. For example, with the knowledge of certain ingredients in what I eat, I have been able to easily and healthily change my diet. Simply put, the Food and Drug Administration is honest with the public and tries to keep people healthy. However, not only does the FDA try to keep

Recently the federal government passed a law that, “requires restaurant chains with 20 or more outlets to disclose calorie counts on their food items and supply information on how many calories a healthy person should eat in a day” (Rosenbloom). By doing this it is helping to expose the nutritional information allowing the American people to be aware of what they are eating; if it is healthy or unhealthy. Many wonder if people make good decisions when it comes to which food choices they consume. People who support this new federal law believe that, “even if menu labeling does not inspire consumers to eat better, they should be told what they are putting in their mouths” (Rosenbloom). Even though the menu items are labeled it does not matter to those people that overlook it, because those people consume it

Overall, about 60% of Canadians are eating out one or more times per week, and nearly 40% of Canadians eat out at least a few times per week (16). Moreover, approximately 25-30% of Canadians food spending is on food eaten away from home (16). Canadian consumers face barriers to regularly dining out such as the high levels and wide variation in the calories and sodium content of foods, the large portion sizes, and misleading marketing claims on restaurant menus (16). The Nutrition Facts label, provides nutritional information for food products purchased at grocery stores, however, prior to January 1st 2017, nutrition facts such as the calorie content were not easily accessible for consumers dining at Ontario restaurants (1). Currently, Ontario is the only province in Canada to enforce a calorie labeling legislation in food service operations with 20 or more locations (4).

I was excited to see the posting for the Resolution & Complaint Correspondent posting. I believe my work experience and related skills will be an excellent match for your needs.

As you may already know labeling and nutrition have been around for a while to help us with counting how much calories we may put into our diets. Why not put it on menus when we enter in a restaurant or fast food place. Calorie labeling on restaurant menus and vending machines can help you be informed and make helpful decisions about meals and snacks. However others may say otherwise. In the debate from the passage claims that customers may like the idea of nutritional labeling, but they still do not seem to be lacking on it. Mentioning that whether or not labeling actually matters. In my state of matter I believe and agree that labeling on menus should definitely be required. To find out more about my personal point of view in this debate,