In the text, it is observed that the authors consistently maintained the good choice of words. They have chosen words that are appropriate to the context of the text, accurate, and understandable to the readers. Also, the authors have clearly maintained the formal and persuasive tone of the text. Since it is an academic and an argumentative text the tone should be formal and persuasive. It should be persuasive since the purpose of the text is to take a stand with sufficient proof to convince the readers. In spite of the fact that the authors have given multiple sources and references, The sources and references however did not came from authoritative sources and were invalid.
This question requires you to integrate a variety of sources into a coherent, well-written essay. Refer to the sources to support your position; avoid mere paraphrase or summary. Your argument should be central; the sources should support this argument.
The essay will conclude by revealing through the use of evidence which was the dominant factor in the speech in gaining support
1. Briefly explain the authors argument and whether you agree or disagree with their position. Why or why not?
To be clear, the intent of this essay is not to argue for or against the content; instead, we are analyzing what the article does in terms of the following:
-The organization of the essay is terrific. The essay starts with introductions on those negative depiction, and soon the author declares her statement and opinion, followed by persuasive evidences and arguments distinguished clearly.
| The argument is presented in a logical order that shows clear expression of ideas. All supporting facts and statistics are
4. The paper must logically develop the thesis in a way that leads to the conclusion, and that development must be supported by facts, fully
In conclusion, the author opposes every idea mentioned in the article. This proves that his negative attitude could affect the way the reader views his points. White’s explanation of the pros and cons contradict his opinions shown in the article. In regard to the author presenting this article with facts, he failed to support them with any credibility. Thus, his assumptions are weak which make his claim unreliable.
The use of persuasive rhetoric writing can be helpful in the working world, especially when you need people to follow you. Using Ethos, is a way to approach your audience by establishing common ground, instead of coming off as authoritative. Even if someone doesn’t have the same views as you, if you acknowledge their values and beliefs, it’s easier to persuade them, because they see you do care about their opinion. As I move forward in any form of communication it is important to keep that in mind, and next year I’ll being using it a lot as president of CAC. Being the president of club means you have to communicate with your members, and the general public. CAC is involved in getting others to help, with the biggest event we hold, Relay for Life.
Although the subject is very long and descriptive, for the most part it’s interesting. It was also surprising that, although the subject itself is simple and doesn't require much explanation, the author expanded every idea with specific detail and also facts that support each idea which made the article a lot longer but a lot more helpful. The author certainly has the qualifi-cations necessary to write this
The article does well provide details to support main point of the author argument. In fact, the usage of statistics and other people stories may reinforced the credibility of this article. Furthermore, because of the usage of clear language and key terms that were fine defined aids the readers in understanding the message of the text. The only downfall of the article is some of statistics is not well supported with evidence or a guidelines guiding us back the origins of these statistics, although the paper is not flawless, the overall strong point of it defeats it
When taking a stance on a controversial topic, it is important to be aware of all sides of the argument, and this article is effective in acknowledging these opinions. The authors of the article recognize some people with other arguments do make a few good
In the article by Kerby Anderson he uses many different points of views and evidence
Even though the authors have valid points and cite credible sources, their argument fails to be effective in several ways. For one,
In this written report, I will be including both sides of the argument which enable me to form my opinion as well as conclusion.