Freedom : Freedom Of Speech And Freedom Of Speech

The First Amendment, one of the most controversial amendments in this day of age, is the freedom of speech. Many people believe that people should have the freedom of speech without any restrictions but others believe differently. In the movie “We are Legion” the First Amendment is viewed differently between the two groups, the Anonymous and the rest of the world. While the world believes that some information should be confidential and have restrictions on what should be said and how it can be said. Anonymous believes that information should be made public for the public and their actions should be protected by the First Amendment. Although the First Amendment protects the group, many people believe that they should still be charged and tried for releasing confidential information to the public. Should people be charged for exercising a right that was given to them by the country that they live in? While some people believe that freedom of speech is limited, others want no restrictions on the amendment, except for example if you are in someone’s home and have limited speech. As a citizen of the United States, I do not believe that Anonymous is doing the right thing even if they are protected by the First Amendment.

Malcolm X had called many to violence and many acted on it. He stated “I am for violence if non-violence means we continue postponing a solution to the American black man's problem just to avoid violence.” While Malcolm was never arrested for his cries for violence, his followers were punished when they acted on them. This is due to the followers lack of judgement from right and wrong. There were successful ways that civil rights activists could voice their protest without violence. And accomplish their goal. Martin Luther King Jr. was a prime example of peaceful assembly and used his freedom of speech to inspire many.He also made one of the largest advances in civil rights progress in United States history. If Malcolm’s followers had instead followed Martin Luther King Jr’s.peaceful protests. They would not have been arrested. Therefore public speakers who call for violence should not be arrested and remain protected under the first amendment. This is because it is the people's choice to decide their actions and if they choose to commit

After reading the transcript of the speech, “The Spirit of Liberty”, given by federal judge for more than 50 years, Learned Hand, who served most of the time on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York, my idea of what it means to be an American was slightly shifted. The statement made by Hand which really caught my attention was, “What do we mean when we say that first of all we seek liberty? I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon constitutions, upon laws and upon courts. These are false hopes.” I agree with Hand in the sense that the constitution can only serve purpose to our country if we, as Americans, learn to be truly accepting.

Freedom of speech is a fundamental human right. Whether or not on a college campus, people (especially college students) should have the right to speak freely. Everyone does have the right to speak freely, because it is one of the twenty-seven amendments. Colleges all around the United States are now home to many restrictions on free speech. For example, the idea and use of “free speech zones” has made its way to colleges everywhere. A “free speech zone” is a sidewalk sized place where students are allowed to speak their minds freely on college campuses. I know what you’re thinking. This sounds ridiculous. Why are there specific places for people to speak their minds? Aren’t colleges suppose to be a place where students speak their minds and learn new things? Universities should not be able to put any restrictions on free speech.

Many people come to the United States looking for freedom and liberty and where their essential rights are protected under the Constitution. However, freedom should not be taken for granted as for every rule there may be limits. The First Amendment of the United States’ Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (Corwin 48). In other words, the First Amendment granted freedom of religion, speech, press, peaceful assembly, and petition. The First Amendment is clear enough for anyone to comprehend and process easily; however, people sometimes misunderstand their rights by doing what their First Amendment right does not protect, especially when it comes to freedom of speech. Seven of the most important law cases in the United States’ history are what shaped the American’s society and allowed people to hopefully know and recognize their limits and restrictions when it comes to their speech whether it was a literal speech or a symbolic speech.

Free Speech is the American’s most important and used privilege provided by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Every American use this technique to express their beliefs and it is most often attacked freedom by the government. Although many critics argue for the unlimited boundaries and lesser interruption by the government to the freedom of speech, I support the systematical restrictions by the government. In my opinion, the extent of free speech is somewhere it can persuasive to its audience as well as less insulting to its opposing ones. I think it is offensive to insult any religious beliefs for the actions led by some members of the religion. For example, Muslims, we cannot pressure them to move from American

In the United States we enjoy many freedoms. There are many place throughout the world that don’t allow you to live your life with the flexibilities that a United States citizen may possess. These right are given by the Unites States constitution has made this country become pioneers of innovation, and cultural development. Having a right to express yourself and your ideals have made this the home of immigrates with the ambition to develop into major contributors in modern society. One freedom we enjoy, I would like to discuss in this paper is freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is one the world’s most sort after rights but as of lately it has been under attack stating it may cause national security issues. In this paper we will look at the development of the First Amendment and how newly enacted laws that will cause the government to label people or groups enacting this rights as extremist.

the united states have free speech and peaceful protest just like mlk and abraham lincoln .....IT is important to stand up for what you believe in because you can make a change . Just like MLK he made a change in this world by just standing up for what he believe in .he believe in justice and peace to win over black americans he brought the world attention how unfairly certain people was treated . Its is always important to stand up for you believe in because you can change the wolr its a lot of people who struggle from a whole lot of stuff like rascism and etc. for example abraham lincoln helped us in this country as the president of united states he issued the emancipation proclamation which process of freedom for american slaves and also

Limits on our rights limit freedom. Colin Kaepernick, a former 49ers quarterback, took a knee during the presentation of the protested during the U.S. national anthem as a way of social protest. Kaepernick and others following his suit have silently protested racial inequality and police brutality. Protesting the national anthem is an appropriate form of free speech. Due to exercising the First Amendment, nonviolent protesting, and by being national, influential football players, refusing to stand for the national anthem is ethical.

The First Amendment say’s “Congress can make no law not allowing freedom of speech to be used by the people”. Now I will give u some historical background. The First Amendment without a doubt was an action against the silence of free speech that existed in The English society. Until 1694, there was a complicated system of licensing in England, and no public was allowed without a government license. Blackstone, with his famous commentaries in law, said that “the liberty of the press say’s laying no previous restraints upon publications, and not in freedom from censure for criminal stuff when published... To subject the press to the power of a license . . . is to subject all of the freedom of sentiment to the power of one man, and make him the

The First Amendment of the Constitution protects individuals freedom of speech. Many people think they have the right to express whatever they want, which most of the time it is true, but sometimes it does have consequences even though it's not illegal.

Freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are two principles key to the core of the American society. The Bill of Rights is a piece of literature that Americans pride themselves on, however it can sometimes raise more questions than answers. The recent protesters in Charlottesville exercised their unalienable rights, but approached an all too familiar line with these rights. A question that is commonly asked is “Where should the line be drawn regarding free speech?” Freedom of assembly is clearly stated in the Bill of Rights, where it is stated that people have the right to peacefully assemble. When discussing freedom of speech however, there is a much larger gray area. Whether freedom of speech protects everything a person says, or up until a point when it restricts the rights of another, has incited many debates. The protests in Charlottesville only worked to revive the debate surrounding this hot topic. In Politics, Aristotle discusses the meaning of speech within the human. Aristotle examines how speech is used by humans to make up for deficiencies in their instinct, as well as how we can effectively use our speech to best suit our community. How would Aristotle describe the speech used by those involved in the Charlottesville protests?

“What you are doing takes a lot of courage… There are already plenty of people fighting fire with fire, and it’s just not helping anyone or anything. So I’m just going to keep listening, with an open mind”; said Nate Boyer in a letter to Colin Kaepernick. In 2016 when Colin Kaepernick sat during the National Anthem to protest police brutality towards African Americans. In response some people were angry but Nate Boyer, a former Green Beret, wrote him a letter. In the letter he states that his initial reaction was one of anger but after looking at Kaepernick’s point of view he respects his opinion and supports his first amendment right. Kaepernick then invites Nate Boyer to join him on the sidelines for a game. Before the game the two come

The United States Constitution granted citizens of the United States several basic liberties. The Bill of Rights 10 which is amendments guaranteeing basic individual protection such as freedom of speech and of religion–became part of the Constitution in 1791 (history.com). While most rights are accepted and welcomed in colleges and universities, free speech comes with limitations. The First Amendment to the US Constitution states:

Free speech is one of the most prevalent issues in today’s society. This is a very sensitive topic since it is one of the core values of our country. Typically people see the issue as very black and white, cut and dry. Especially where I come from, the general opinion is that you have the right to say absolutely anything you please regardless of the impact those words have. I think that this is not the case in our current society. In my opinion the bigger issue today is the concept of safe speech. With the prevalence of protests around the world free speech and safe speech have become the most talked about topics in our country.