| Giant Consumer Products (GCP) | | |
|
A. Situation Analysis:
1. Context: In early September’08 Giant consumer Products, Inc. (GCP) realized that Frozen food division, which had been growing at 2.8% (compounded annual growth) rate since 2003 to 2007 and accounted for almost 33% of GCP’s overall business volume, is not doing well now. The sales as well revenue volume is around 3.9% behind the target. Most specifically marketing margin (key parameter for GCP business) was also under plan by 4.1%. GCP had been doing well in wall-street but performance of past couple of quarters has increased the worries of GCP i.e. whether GCP will able to maintain its profitable growth.
GCP is expecting FFD to deliver the sufficient
…show more content…
B. Evaluation of Strategic alternatives: According to the current position of the sales volume of the various FFD products, we evaluated various options to meet the 2008 FFD annual plan. The few of the alternatives are:
i. Promote only DinardoTM-32 ii. Promote only DinardoTM-16 iii. Promote only The Natural MealsTM product iv. Promote either of DinardoTM & The Natural MealsTM
The key points in evaluating the above mentioned strategies are: a) ROMI – Return on marketing investment should be greater than Zero. b) Marketing Margin – It should also be greater than Zero and close to the planned annual target. It also accounted the cannibalization of other FFD products, while promoting one particular product. c) Gross Margin, Marketing Margin %, Net revenue of the entire FFD product Dinardo-16, Dinardo-32 & “The Natural Meals” should also be close to the planned annual Target.
Analysis of the alternative strategies based on the above parameters: * Our analysis shows that the ROMI of DinardoTM-32 & DinardoTM-16 are negative, which indicates that the incremental profits gained by promoting either of these products are less than the cost of their promotions (Please refer Exhibit-6). Our analysis also shows that there is a heavy cannibalization among both DinardoTM brands (Please refer Exhibit – 7). * We also analyzed the sales figures of other DinardoTM (8 & 6 ounce) products over
The company started off producing 20,000 units of mountain bikes. We did not change the production quantity. Last year our forecast sales were 24,000 when we only sold 19,866; therefore we thought it would be best to leave production at 20,000 bikes. Having excess inventory, we concluded that 20,000 units should be enough considering our quality has not changed and our advertising will not increase the sales dramatically. Although we had the choice to produce as much as 30,000 units, we felt as though we did not have sufficient money to increase production. We were interested in allocating the money towards marketing as opposed to production. We realized that without awareness, no matter how many units we make, sales would be inefficient.
Using the assumptions given in the case, all elements of income statement and balance sheet can be projected for next three years 2010, 2011 and 2012. Sales cycle of the products of the company is such that sales of a particular product increases initially for few years and then starts to decline as the new technology
The company has been functioning well in terms of generating profit and demand so far. However, there will be a 20% increase in demand for the next month of operations as predicted by management, and the production and supply management's problems may come as a problem they can no longer afford.
Although the company did show an increased gross profit of $8,255,000 with $6,358,000 less Net Sales in 2013 versus 2012, that increase is due to the reduction in product Cost of Goods Sold by $14,613,000. Since increases in product price will negatively affect sales, one of management’s primary goals is to keep prices stable. This objective is achieved through implementation of cost cutting programs, investing in more efficient equipment, and automation of more steps in the production process.
If you compare bakery sales in July to bakery sales in September, it shows a 66% increase in sales in just two months. Peyton Approved uses its equity to finance the business than taking out loans. It has a .36% Debt to Equity ratio. The best ratio for the business is the profit margin. In three months the profit margin for Peyton Approved is 53.4%. The company just added a product line of hypoallergenic shampoos. It has been selling these products for one month and the company only turned the product over once during that month. At this time it does not look like adding these products to sales is
There are several strategic options that need to be considered in order to fully address the
The purpose of this paper is to advise analyze the financial statements of Dillard’s, Inc. in order to recommend whether or not my client should invest $1 million in the large retail company. I will compare the financial statements of Dillard’s, Inc. its competitor, Kohl’s Corporation. Investing in retail can be risky because a retail company’s performance is very heavily influenced by factors that have nothing to do with the actual company such as the overall performance of the economy or the weather during the holiday shopping season. There is, however, potential for profitability within the retail sector. Based on my analysis, I recommend that the client should not invest in Dillard’s, Inc. for the following reasons. First, Dillard’s has experience a decline in net income in the last three years. Second, liquidity ratios indicate that they could face possible liquidity constraints in the future. Third, long-term debt paying ability ratios indicate that the company could have trouble paying off the principal of its current debt obligations. Fourth, the profitability ratios are well below industry averages, suggesting that there are more profitable companies to invest in within the industry. And finally, Investor analysis ratios provide mixed opinion of the future performance of the company. I conclude that retail can be a profitable industry to invest in if an investor has the risk tolerance and risk capacity to withstand the uncertainty, but neither Dillard’s
(c) What will Yabba’s market share have to be next year for its profit to be the same as this year?
C. How did this affect the product’s marketing mix price, promotion, packaging and distribution decisions?
The third table is to outline some of the activities we might find at each stage of the marketing process; this is brief summary of the importance of the different stages.
Companies strive to choose not only the best marketing channels, but also the best profitable channel. A profitable channel can promote and successfully sell out of a product that might not otherwise turn a profit for their producers (New Charter University 2015). “The calculations from the cost accountant for the retail segment accounts were 60 percent of sales, and for the foodservice segment accounts were 40 percent. The cost accountant believes that both channels are profitable. The accountant also believes that the company achieves an overall average gross margin of 60 percent on its sales (Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., Cooper, M. B.,
As marketing manager of the RBG business, Ivan Guillen must propose a solution to repair Pillsbury refrigerated baked goods (RGB)’s business performance. Since the refrigerated-cookie product line consisted of 62% of RBG’s unit sales and over 75% of the company’s profits, Guillen found it appropriate to alter this segment in the market. Proposing this idea to GMCC would require Guillen to consider all the challenges he faces. Guillen will have to discover a strategy to increase household penetration since it has fallen to 24% in the past few years. The lack in market penetration has
Despite the inconsistent changes in spending from year to year, P&G’s market share consistently increased between 1% and 2% every twelve months (see Figure 1). The question is, with Unilever’s actions in regards to marketing expenditures, is the 15% increase going to be enough to restart P&G’s upward growth of market share?
The results of my decisions that were made in 2015 Q2 turned out to be better than last quarter results. Existing customers increased by 9% and sales from new customers increased by 6%, while the distributors, on average, are attempting to achieve a 5% profit margin; overall not a bad turnover from prior quarters. These decisions led to segment A as being very satisfied reflecting how the motors’ high power to size ratio allowed them to pick up some new business from some loyal customers. Segment B was satisfied in this quarter like they have been in previous quarters, however they expressed their concern on future orders that they would like to receive more insight into the market trends by our staff. Segment C increased their overall satisfaction from prior quarters of being satisfied to very satisfied in this quarter. By getting the motors that they ordered to them in a rush, allowed them to land a contract from another GPO. However as the saying goes, “you can’t win them
For this phase we decided to continue with the selection criteria from phase 1, and continue to try to increase sales with the minimum working capital requirement. We also decided to minimize risk and not go with options that have, however small, a chance of creating net losses for the company.