Firstly, we must understand what is meant by ‘good’ well good is that which is morally right. With God it is said in the bible “oh give thanks to the lord, for he is good; for His loving-kindness is everlasting (Psalms), another way is the 10 commandments which shows God setting the standard of what is morally right and wrong. Another way of showing of how ‘God is good’ is by creation in genesis 1 and 2 which shows God either creating the world or how he is crafting everything, also in the bible of how God has preformed miracles and in todays society.
In the bible there are many passages, which say ‘God is good’ for example in James ‘every good thing bestowed and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of
…show more content…
The goodness of God may be seen in the New Testament personality of Jesus. Some Christians would say that the perfect goodness of God may be seen in Jesus, who of course suffers on the cross. This raises the question "Can the goodness of God be seen in the sufferings of Jesus?" It is difficult to believe in a God who is perfectly good.
Reasons for thinking it is
If God is perfectly good, does this mean that all the things God does are also good?
The issue stems from the Euthyphro dilemma, which states that either God is good by definition or that God ascribes to a standard of goodness which is external to him.
This causes problems when one considers some of the things it is said that God does. Are the things which God does good by definition? This would include wars and plagues. It also assumes that much of what we call evil comes from God.
It is evil which is at the heart of the criticism here. It is incompatible to have God who is said to be all powerful (omnipotent), all loving (omnibenevolent) and have a presence of evil in the world. The choice is to deny that God is all powerful or to say that there is no such thing as evil or to cast doubt on his omnibenevolence.
Reasons for thinking it is not
Many religious people would find it difficult to love and worship a God who did not have their best interests at heart.
A number of modern who does what he can when he can, than to have a God who is not supreme goodness.
The philosopher
" God is good to us. We should be grateful and prove our gratitude by our
God is depicted in the Old Testament with a very bad reputation. David Lamb is an old testament professor and he addresses some of the reasons for this bad reputation. In Lamb’s book, God Behaving Badly: Is the God of the Old Testament Angry, Sexist and Racist? In his book, there are seven specific citations addressed that provide proof and evidence for those who would believe “God behaves badly.” The examples that Professor Lamb chose are: angry or loving, sexist or affirming, racist or hospitable, violent or peaceful, legalistic or gracious, rigid or flexible, and distant or near. With each chapter that Lamb writes, it provides multiple biblical narrative accounts and establishes a basis for the particular argument aimed against God.
Most of us believe that if there is a God who has the power to nullify any evil characteristic. Wouldn’t He as the all-powerful God allow certain situations to occur in order for the good to arise from the sadistic or evil? If the world was solely good or morally virtuous, how would the Almighty God find a way to be glorified through things which man has done? To exemplify what has been asked, I would like to address the good that arise from the bad. Just like Professor Ed explained about his son’s dog, there is good that comes from the bad (loss of a pet), as there was plenty of good that occurred during the period of the life of the pet or human life if a human life was lost in an unrelated situation. The bad (death) can be turned into good simply by reflecting on the time they or we have had with that animal or person. To respond to the second question on how God can be glorified through the evil or bad, is He allows situations to occur in order for Him to be venerated. He created all life and He gave us the free will to act without restrictions, so that when we respond virtuously when evil comes our way, He is worshiped and esteemed as our
If god was all good, all powerful and all knowing, he would not allow the existence of evil.
The only thing that God can do, and does all of the time, is to draw good from any evil
In a world of chaos, he who lives, lives by his own laws and values. Who is to say that the death of millions is any worse or better, for that matter, than injuring a cockroach. And in the case of an existing power in the form of God, who is presumed to be all which is good, presiding and ruling an organized universe, why then does evil exist? The prosaic response of “without evil, there is no good” no longer holds any validity in this argument as the admitted goal of good is to reach an existence without evil. So even if a God does exist, I think it is fair, at this point, to say that he is the embodiment of both good and evil. And if humoring those who would answer the previous question with the response that there can be no good
Furthermore, god is supposedly full of wisdom, his wisdom is infinite, yet the world lacks heavily. One way this can be viewed is with nature, how nature scarcely tends to the need of human and animal happiness. One question that one may ask is can and is god able to prevent evil? Does he have what it takes; maybe god is impotent (lacking power, strength). According
Could this possibly mean that ‘good’ is measured that way also? Is there a measurement for what good stands for? I propose that we let Scripture help us define the meaning of good. To start off with we must realize that Scripture is the Word of God. 2 Timothy 3:16 states, “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness”. Using this verse as our jumping point let’s look at what the scriptures have to say about ‘good or goodness’. James 1:17 explains, “Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning”. C.S. Lewis in this book The Great Divorce writes, “There is but one good; that is God. Everything else is good when it looks to Him and bad when it turns from Him”. If we know that all good things come from God and that good represents God we now have an idea of how to measure that which is
Ernest Nagel identifies that God is all-knowing, all-powerful, and loving. However, if God has all of those traits, then why would He allow evil? This is where the problem of evil comes in. It says that if God exists, he is omnipotent, omniscient, and benevolent. Because God is omniscient, He knows when evil occurs. Since He is omnipotent, He has the power to prevent it and his benevolent nature would permit him to stop evil. Yet, evil occurs anyways. Therefore, a God with such traits does not
If God is both omnipotent and wholly good, then He would make men freely choose good on every occasion.
In the poem “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards, the question is not directly answered by Edwards, but I think Edwards think that most people are sinners and do not think people are basically good, which makes the answer to the question to be that people are not basically good. Edwards states that God holds you over a pit of fire or “Hell” as if you held an insect over a fire. Edwards states that “he (God) looks upon you as worthy of nothing else” (Edwards 127). Edwards says all people have offended God making him angry.
God seems good in the way that is already known, He is perfect and holy, but He
Many would read that statement and cry heresy, and maybe it is. I believe in a God that created everything. As the creator of all God is not bound by the same concepts and laws that people are. He exists outside of time and possesses omniscience to know everything that has or will happen. God is completely good.
How we view the presence of God and evil depends on why we believe the world was created. If man is a fully created creature then the world was created for him to live in, a comfortable, pleasant place. Our world is obviously filled with suffering, danger, hardship of all kinds, so an all-powerful God could not have created it. To Christians the world is not a paradise where one can experience the maximum of pleasure and a minimum of pain. The world is a place of “soul making” or person making. As we try and understand the challenges of our lives, and our environment we may become “Children Of God”.
God is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent, which makes us wonder what kind of morally sufficient reason justifies God to allow evil. We know that evil exists in our world, but so does God, so would God be the source of evil as well as good? We have established that God is the omnipotent and benevolent free creator of the world, but suffering and evil exist. Is God unable to prevent evil? If so, he would not be omnipotent. Is He able to prevent the evil in our world but unwilling? If this were then case then he wouldn’t be benevolent. A Persian thinker, Mani, suggested that the answer to this question was a kind of duality between the good and evil. This pluralistic view of the good and evil in our world would suggest that God is