preview

Goodbeer's Misconceptions

Decent Essays

The witch trials that occurred all over New England during the seventeenth are shrouded in general misconceptions. Richarch Godbeer in his article “how could they believe that” expands on the topic. He takes us through the various elements that generate these misconceptions. Such as modern comforts that modify the way we interpret events. Following this assertion, Godbeer, attempts to shed light on how the populace of seventeenth century New England perceived these events. He divides the essay into two portions, the social climate of the time and the legal scrutiny of the accusations faced. Furthermore, he proves that the courts were highly cautious of any accusations made, leading to rigorous investigations. However, to begin analyzing Goodbeers …show more content…

Many of us now attempt to view the world in an empirical way. However, according to Goodbeer, many of the people that dismiss the superstitious beliefs of the witch trials fail to realize the “leaps of faith” made by modern scientist. This hypocrisy is seen when one looks at the differences in how our worlds operate. In particular when we deal with diseases, back in the seventeenth century they were incapable of diagnosing even the most of common ailments. The way that seventeenth century New Englanders had of dealing and explaining these uncertainties that we no longer face was by explaining it through religion and supernatural phenomenon. Furthermore, they did not have the ability to counteract environmental occurrences that could lead to harm such as darkness and cold, which we now have. Having understood why and how the seventeenth century New Engalnders began to rely on the supernatural to explain certain occurrences in their world we can begin to understand the cultural context of the time (Godbeer, …show more content…

By first bringing to light the misconceptions he saw many of his students poses, Godbeer can is able refute these points and show us the true reasoning behind their actions. Furthermore, he creates a far more realistic and relatable picture of seventeenth century New England. This primes the reader to become sympathetic towards the struggles that they faced and how the New Englanders coped with understanding certain phenomena. This picture is further reinforced with the detailed example of Katherine Branch. By demonstrating the near scientific scrutiny and skepticism that many New Englanders had, Godbeer shows that these were not irrational people in the very least. When thinking of the past, as Godbeer shows, many people attempt to understand their actions by applying a modern understanding of the world. However, in the majority of cases the environmental, social and cultural contexts were far more different. This naturally percolates over into how these people perceived their reality. By contrasting past occurrences with modern situations Godbeer enables the reader to understand how similar we are to the individuals of the past. Finally, he shows that skepticism and legal scrutiny are near immutable traits withing human society whether they are large or

Get Access