The third article to the United States Constitution concerns the judicial aspects of the federal government and how that branch of government must be executed. Although, the U.S. Constitution does not give that much of a detailed outline of how the courts shall be conducted. The Bill of Right, however, does have some say in the matter. In particular, amendments four, five, six and seven deal with citizens’ rights in the judicial system. “The judicial Power shall extend under this Constitution, the Laws of the United State, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority…” This is relevant in today’s society because it has evolved so much since the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were ratified, they still hold significance …show more content…
The jury system that is in place by the United States Constitution is pivotal to hearing the rights and grievances of citizens in public and with a jury of their peers. Why, even Amendment six of the Bill of Right is written as thus; “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed… to have the assistance of counsel for his defense”. The point being that there are safeguards in place to protect the rights of every American citizen. These safeguards are the Bill of Right, which along with the Constitution of the United States is the bedrock for the republic. To be specific on the matter at hand, the third article of the Constitution must be examined for an understanding of how and why it functions in the …show more content…
If the charges manages to break a law, then the trial may be moved to a criminal court, not a court of law that settles property disputes or minor issues of legal degrees. It must be noted that, “The majority of legal disputes in the U.S. are settled in state courts, but federal courts have considerable power as well. Many of their rulings become precedent, or a principle, law or interpretation of a law established by a court ruling.” It also must be noted that the “Bill of Rights” was created and authorized to act on the United States Constitution, so the new federal government might have some limitations brought into it for a reason. The U.S. Constitution grants and outlines the new structure of the relationship between the federal government, the states and the people, the bedrock of democracy. The judicial branch, i.e. the institution that will be known as the Supreme Court, will have the task of interpreting the laws and to puzzle out how this law can or cannot be legal or not and whether a law can be constitutional or unconstitutional. These were not mentioned in Article III of the Constitution. Yet, they have been expanded upon later in the Bill of Rights as further protections from the federal government and to make sure that a tyranny does not
The role of the jury in criminal
Juries are embedded in the foundation of America. Preceding the revolution, trials were dictated solely by judges, which led to flawed rulings. After numerous taxes were passed in court in the colonist’s favor, the American Revolution had its start, and would continue until the United States became a recognized nation. In this nation, a right to trial by jury was granted and protected by the Constitution. The significance of this decision is seen in the courtroom, where the people’s vote is what stands between the government.
The American judicial system is built on the idea that any person who is accused of a crime is innocent until proven guilty. There are many amendments that help protect the rights of the accused. The 6th Amendment guarantees the right of a speedy trial, the 7th guarantees trial by jury. In 1966, the Supreme Court decided Miranda v. Arizona, in a 5-4 vote for Miranda, which established a guarantee against self incrimination. This was very important for people that are accused of a crime because they are given the right to remain silent until they talk to their lawyer. Some argue that this law can put criminals back on the street, however I believe that it also protects the people that are innocent, but accused of a crime. As Justice Warren stated “Under any other rule, a constitution would indeed be as easy of
Juries are a crucial and irreplaceable part of the American justice system. The jury system has been around for hundreds of years. Our founding fathers viewed jury service as a critical part of democracy and self government. Twelve ordinary citizens make up the jury and will form a decision about the case. The jury system is still needed in the twenty-first century because it ensures the accused gets a fair trial and it promotes civic participation.
America is built on the foundation of society being run and well-flowing around the three values the Republic of the United States hold most dear to: equality, freedom, and justice. The rights of the accused is an important factor in maximizing justice. Amendments 4-8 in the Bill of Rights specifically detail how criminal law should be dealt with, and how justice can be ensured every step of the way. The Fifth and Sixth Amendments contain two systems that go hand in hand with one another, a due process and a trial by jury for all citizens. Amendments 4-8, a Due Process, and a Trial by Jury are essential for establishing the rights of the accused and their absence would be detrimental to the effectiveness of the American criminal justice system.
A 3rd Article of the Constitution talks about the Judicial Branch. It says that there will be a court and then a “supreme” court that will make many decisions. It later says what kind of cases the federal government gets to hear. The framers wrote detailed descriptions for this Article so that the Judicial system new what cases they got and what cases the federal government got. Without the description, the federal government could possibly override the Supreme Court and get all of the cases. The framers also saw that this Article would need provisions because new cases would arise and new courts would come around.
The sixth amendment states, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and District wherein the crime shall have been committed, which District shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel or his defence.” ("The Bill of Rights and Amendments 11-27.") This amendment means that anyone who is accused of a crime has the right to a quick and public trial. The trial of the accused must be held by an unbiased jury in the area where the crime supposedly
This amendment was a part of the Bill of Rights and adds a number of rights for an accused citizen. These rights include a fair trial, speedy and public trial, an impartial jury, a notice of accusation, a confrontation of the witness, and right to a lawyer. A speedy trial means that the government cannot delay a trial to keep you in jail. A public trial ensures that rules a being followed correctly. An impartial jury means that they will not convict you without sufficient evidence. A notice of accusation forces the government to tell you what you did wrong. A confrontation of a witness is that people who saw the crime must testify. A right to a lawyer means that you have the right to have a lawyer even if you do not have the money for one.
In the Constitution, the Supreme Court is the overriding law of the land. The Supreme Court can overrule the decisions made by the likes of a state or appeals court. The Constitution is clear in its attempts to unify the nation and strengthen the federal government, all while maintaining the freedoms of the states and the feeling of equality. Though the Constitution is written in a vague way, leaving it to be open for interpretation and allowing it to conform with the changes that time brings to society. But because of the uncertainty of the document, it has often been misinterpreted, or has caused a wide array of viewpoints of a certain issues. The most memorable example being that of the Civil War, but today it is even more prevalent when we try to relate modern day issues to the ambiguous instructions left to us by our forefathers.
Many states use preliminary hearings instead of grand jury. Each of these legal institutions serves to avoid misjudged criminal prosecutions. Without this protection it could be that more accused had to wait in jail for a trial without an initial evaluation of the evidence against them. Preliminary hearings and grand juries protect people from unfounded accusations by the government.
In 1789, each of the thirteen states had already establish a judicial system such as criminal and civil cases. The United States Constitution is the original document in which it established fundamental laws for the national government as well as protecting the right of the citizens. The U.S Constitution was designed to avoid too much power in the system of checks and balances. As years went by, the Constitution began to adapt to the modern changes. Subsequently, the judicial system began to full fill the U.S Constitution’s purpose. Both Federal and State have their own jurisdiction and functions as stated in the Constitution. However, in recent years the judicial system has been broken due to lack of structure in law on the book and law in action.
The Third Article of the United States Constitution set up the Judicial Branch. Section One of the Article set up the Judicial Branch with “one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” It also stated that the judges in the Court can only hold office in good behavior with a compensation that is unchanging at anytime in the Court. During their time in office, that is. The Second Section of the Constitution brings to mention the fact that the power that the Judicial Branch has goes to anyone. All cases brought under the Constitution of the United States of America are seen in Court. It also talks about criminal cases having a trial by jury. This not including impeachment trials. The
The supreme court is the highest, most important court in the United States and the titles of the men and women who serve on the high court are associate justices. There are over nine judges who are on the supreme court, eight are associate justices and one is the chief justice. They are all appointed by the presidet but they are approved by the senate. The term of office for the nine judges who serve for the high court is for life. There are over 91 district courts, which are the lowest courts, and 12 appellate courts. Three courts that are part of the federal judicial system are the Court of Military Appeals, United States Claims Court, and United States Tax Court. The nine type of cases the Supreme court and federal courts have jurisdiction over are the constitution, federal laws, treaties, law governing ships, the United States government itself, ambassadors or public ministers, two or more state governents, citizens od different states and a state or its citizens versus a foreign country or foreign citizen. The process of checking the laws of our land is called the judicial review. When the supreme court declares a law unconstitutional, it means that the law goes against the constitution of the United States. In order for a person to be convicted of treason two witnessess must testify, telling the exact same story and/or the accused must confess in a
In an ordered society, justice is necessary for everyone must be treated fairly. Regardless of a bad action or crime a person commits, they must receive a fair trial. Within the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution, the sixth amendment states that one has a right to a speedy, public, and impartial trial by jury. Within The Eumenides, Athene is the voice
presentment and have been indicted by a Grand Jury. This allows for people to “plead the 5th” in court. The text of the Sixth Amendment states that in all and any criminal prosecutions, the accused will be given the right to a public and speedy trial, by an impartial jury of the district and state where the crime took place. The Seventh Amendment gives an individual a right to have a trial by jury instead of judge to some civil cases. The Supreme Court ruled in Justices v. Murray, 76 U.S. 9 Wall. 274 274 (1869), that the Seventh Amendment is not only limited in being applied to civil lawsuits that are tried before juries found in United States courts, but is also applicable in cases that are tried before a jury when at a state court. The