Whenever a person puts the words “Donald Trump” & “President” together you get very stark reactions. You have the followers and the resistance. This may sound comparable to a plot to a Hollywood movie but this is the world I live in today. As Trump won the presidency there has been an exponential jump in fear and carelessness. The overall theme of his presidency is manipulation through many factors and below I will try to connect these parts to his manipulated presidency. Firstly, Guy Debord talks about the idea of a spectacle and that it is not reality. While we may give precedence to celebrities and personalities, they don’t appear to live in the same equal conditions as us. “The spectacle subjects living human beings to its will to the extent that the economy has brought them under its sway” (Debord, para. 16). Majority of …show more content…
We arrive at our next author, Nora Young, who discusses the delights and damage of digital life. She believes people are moving from living life as a normal person into becoming your digital persona. “Digital Technology takes us out of where we are” (Young, pg. 85). That we are moving our attitudes along the Elaboration Likelihood Model from more central beings into peripheral. Basically, voters are not dissecting or understanding more information and are beginning to blur the details and not care. With Trump, he seems to be this caricature of the stereotypical white supremacist & sexist but while it’s so exaggerated, it is not a parody. However, regular people want to become spectacles so they keep videos/photos of special places/messages. They try to participate in this media narrative by spreading/acting out ill though out racial messages to gain attention to become a part of the spectacle as Debord explained earlier. Trump manages to utilize twitter to its best ability to still manipulate his constituents by enticing them into a false reality of
The New York Times columnist David Brooks calls it “the greatest political shock of our lifetime.” At the end of August, it seemed as though Donald Trump was destined to fail in his bid to become the 45th President of the United States. After months of new revelations of sexual harassments and use of vulgar language, spectators of the political sport were almost certain that Secretary Clinton would win, and then that fateful day came. Everyone, including some of Donald Trump’s most ardent supporters were shocked at the outcome of the election, leaving many to ask how such a thing could happen. While still shocking, ideas and concepts learned in the Election the President seminar have helped to explain the process, the results, and even the candidates themselves.
Donald Trump before he became the 45th president, his famous campaign motto “Make America Great Again” caught the attention of many Americans, but mostly by white Americans. Trump’s tactics made him a very clever man throughout the election, he had many techniques on how to gain the American vote. Throughout his campaign, he was attentive of the men around him. For example, Trump knew exactly what to say to get the attention of the American people. He already had in mind who he was going to pick in position for foreign policy, national security, and defense (“Donald Trump is the ultimate Machiavellian prince”). With this intention, he brought comfort to Americans, yet the people he was going to pick for these positions all have a common trait, which was all of them are specialist in the Middle East and Russia. Not only, was Trump attentive of America, yet he kept in mind how it was going to affect
However, when confidence in the government is lost due to public crises, people seek a charismatic leader. As a charismatic leader, “men do not obey him by virtue of tradition or statute, but because they believe in him” (Weber 1946, 79). Trump expresses charisma in his determination and vows to make “make great America again”, which impresses his followers. Many may find Trump to be inspiring, honest, or courageous. It’s those unique characteristics that gain him authority and is a powerful form of domination that builds a close relationship between the leader and his/her followers. Trump does not abide by norms or traditional policies, he has a personal approach in the system. His passionate emphasis on his ability to restore broken policies and America, convinces and attracts followers that believe in his infallible
Does Nicolas Carr, author of “How Social Media Is Ruining Politics” provide enough evidence that social media is ruining politics? The answer is a very obvious yes. Overtime, social media has slowly polarized the political perception of the American people. Social Networking is a new, popular medium that has changed the nature of political conversation. Therefore, it has become both a good thing and a bad thing. It has encouraged those who once did not partake in the political process to participate. Social networking is very useful to find out news and information ahead of the news media.. “It has become an easy way for political candidates to connect and communicate with the American people.” (Carr 1) While social media might provide the candidates with a form of convenience because it simplifies and speeds up the communication process, it also provides many ways for their campaigns to be easily and deliberately attacked. Unfortunately, what receives the most attention on social media is outrageous statements. Some candidates like Donald Trump know how to use this to their advantage. The danger in this is that candidates tend to use abrasive soundbites to grab the attention of the social media user. Unfortunately, the abrasive soundbites are often taken out the intended context. Other candidates like Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush did not come to this realization as quickly because they did not want to take the chance of hindering their image. They understood that a
Social Media has become a huge part of our lives. It is a way to connect to those far away, or to share things that we find interesting or exciting and can be a very personal presentation of who we are. But in both positive and negative ways we can share our opinions and our view on certain events in the world. These can lead to rallies, protests, uprisings or in some cases revolution, the internet has become one of the most influential forces in this world and a large part of that is due to social media. In the case of the Michael Brown shooting, social media focused on the positive and negative relationships between minorities and cops in the United States of America. Sites such as Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and Vine were all used to show
However, an epidemic of fear and anger he helped spawn during his campaign is still legit: Mr. Trump has yet to fully recant his pernicious doctrines, and his renewed promise to look out for all Americans has not yet been vetted. Besides, by authorizing Stephen Bannon, founder of alt-right tabloid, to modulate his vision for the nation, Trump has put the machinations of his inchoate administration in gear, inching toward an unholy union with white nationalists and extremists, which would inevitably give birth to heightened fear,
Donald Trump’s win in the recent Presidential campaign is probably one of the greatest paradoxes in the recent political history of the US. On the one hand, he was the candidate unwanted and criticised by everyone, including the Republican Party, which has actually nominated him as the President. On the other hand, his very controversial sayings and ideas has drawn the public attention and public support to him and revived nostalgic feelings of many Americans about traditional American values and return of America to its greatness.
Everybody says that Donald Trump keeps ridiculizing himself for the whole nation to see and has a tendency to speak without thinking. As a matter of fact, we all thought this was just a publicity hoax going on and we'd move on after a while. As months go by and while many still mock him in the news, there's no denying he's ascending in the polls a dominating the Republican field. I believe Trump will win, despite the absurdity of the conception. I will demonstrate my thesis with three ideas in this essay, starting off with his impact on the US economy, continuing with his demands and finishing with his image in the media.
On January 20th, of this year, America witnessed one of the most baffling moments in all of our history. That moment was when Donald J. Trump, a man of no political background, was inaugurated as President of United States of America. No matter what this man has done in throughout the campaign, or what the media has said about the terrible things he has done or said, he still managed to win the electoral vote and won the title of President. Now, no matter how people feel about this man, Donald has a huge following of people who are ready to support anything he does. He achieved this feat by how he talks and presents himself to the American people, or at least to his audience that is.
Donald Trump is not the only one responsible for what he has created in president elections. “The media made a mistake by covering Trump’s candidacy at the start as some sort of joke or media prank,” notes Danielle S. Allen, a political scientist at Harvard (Kristof, 2016). Donald Trump can’t do it alone in becoming president of American. The people are influencing the politic election. In being a part of the non-serious issues that Donald Trump created made it easy to forget about the real issues our country is currently facing. “The repeated use of references to ‘the Donald’ across all platforms structured the conversation around ironical affection for a celebrity rather than around serious conversation of character and policy” (Kristof,
This article discusses how media influence is also used in other media outlets such as Tumblr and Twitter. Usually media bias is viewed in the context of newspapers and news programs, but now politics are now being incorporated in Tumblr to influence voters. President Obama is using media outlets such as Tumblr in order to appeal to a certain age demographic and influence young voters by “playing to his audience’s preferences.” The president is not the only one to start using these tactics; many foreign governments are starting to incorporate them as well because social media is such a powerful tool.
A commonality among the American public is the negativity and pessimism that floats in the atmosphere of the United States government, although, what many fail to do is act on the change they wish to see. In this, millions of Americans confide on representatives and government officials–the most popular being the President–to in hopes restore the complications they perceive as important. In this 2016 presidential election, individuals in rural and Rust Belt America found Donald Trump, acclaimed entrepreneur and hater of political corruption, found him best fit as an outside source to mend the issues the US faces today. Bringing in the outside, yet strange power of Donald Trump brought new ways in how people viewed social media, press, and
Every election is always different from another, but there are two specific characteristics about every candidate that participates. That is, the candidates being a manipulator or defender of the people. In which republican Donald Trump chose to be a manipulator during this 2016 presidency election. Trump manipulates the people through redefined legitimacy, intimidating his opponents, and creates a sense of inevitable
An “I told you so” echoes from the grave of Neil Postman as a Reality TV star lead the polls for the GOP primary nomination in the 2016 presidential race. Meanwhile, a symbol of the most turbulent times in American history was recently removed from a state capitol and designated for museum status. Today’s latest social media sites like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, has assisted the Internet ‘steady growth and influence of society for over twenty years now. Three authors, Neil Postman, Daniel Solove, and Walter Lippmann have explored how various media and symbols have shaped society through history to today. Postman, in Amusing Ourselves to Death, Public Discourse in Age of Show Business saw the dangers in the medium of television turning the serious subjects of religion, the news, and particularly politics into forms of entertainment. In his book, future of reputation, David Solove argues, the law must meet the challenge to address these ever-changing technologies’ effect on one’s reputation and strive to protect the privacy while ensuring the freedom of speech. In the book, Public Opinion, author Walter Lippmann, explores how symbols are planted by authority figures to corral the public into their camp. While each author takes a different approach, each provides insights into a changing world and a route for an informed society to achieve better citizenship.
Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and other social media websites have affected American elections in many forms. Candidates are now turning their attention to the people on social networks Murse (2015). They 're trying to draw more people like Millennials because they use more technology. These applicants are trying to step up and make a huge difference from the election of 2008. While in the running, the usage of social media is being used to announce what he or she is doing for the presidential campaign. For this reason, candidates, controversy, public opinion, social media and its 21st century media outlets have become the center of the 2016 election (CIO, 2015).