“Have Gun, Will Travel…to Work” Essay

The American society has for long struggle with the debate and issue of private gun ownership. There are the advocates proposing lenient laws to allow more gun possession while the people against it calling for stringent laws to control the situation. For many centuries, since the enactment of the Second Amendment and even during the slavery period, gun ownership remains an issue to debate. The negative effects have been the harassment of the minority and the vulnerable as well as increased crimes. On other hand, it has helped promote the security of the people and ensure there is no violation of people’s rights to own guns as required by the Second Amendment. As such, gun control and ownership remains a controversial and hot topic of discussion

When looking at all of the important issues of today’s society, one of the most neglected issues revolves around guns. Guns serve two different purposes: to defend and to kill. Even though I’ve been on this Earth for only 21 years, I’ve become keen and have taken an interest in the study of guns and how they pose more problems in society than any other issue. My interest all started around the time of the Columbine shooting in Colorado and how society has taken steps since that point in history. Going back to the two different purposes, both have been used to help explain the differences in the distinctions of different gun related events that continue to occur, such as mass shootings. Problem analysis, as stated, will help to explain how

With the Second Amendment giving American citizens the rights to bear arms, and approximately fifty percent of Americans owning some form of a firearm, issues involving the ownership and possession of guns have led to heated debates in American society. Most

cited for demanding unlimited access to firearms, but according to the data provided in this paper, there is only a small chance that privately owned guns will be used in a situation against a robber, intruder, or a criminal. Firearms that are legally purchased by civilians will most likely be used by criminals and will leave innocent citizens injured. Also, supporters of gun rights believe that ‘the right to keep and bear arms” is a guaranteed right to all citizens of the United States and cann

Gun control and gun rights are crucial topics that have been debated for years. Some people believe that civilians should not have the right to own a gun while others believe it is our god given right to bear arms. The second amendment of the Bill of Rights states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”(Shermer). This is a right that society has had for years and is one of the main reasons why no solution has been reached yet. There are two main sides to this debate, Gun control advocates focus on the serious negative effects of gun availability on health and safety, while gun-ownership advocates emphasize the lawful use of guns and

Over the last several years there have been disagreements over people’s right to leave firearms locked in their vehicles. This issue began in 2002 in Oklahoma with the Weyerhaeuser corporation fired employees for having their guns on the company property. As a result of this, the Senate passed with a vote of 92-4 prohibiting “any rule or policy” and prohibiting the law-abiding citizens “from transporting and storing firearms in a locked vehicle.” I agree with the NRA that if companies start banning an employee from being able to have their guns in their vehicles would be like a wrecking ball to the Second Amendment. This would nullify my right to protect myself on my commute to and from work. I feel that laws are getting too involved in what companies can and cannot allow and things are becoming too technical. Most gun-related crimes are committed by non-employees. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics only 7% of the crimes are committed by current

The second amendment of The Constitution of the Unites States rules that “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” In recent years this has become a highlighted and popular discussion topic throughout people and media. Typical with American media the subject of gun control is visited with broad stroked of red and the use of fear tactics while completely ignoring the complicated and underling positives and negatives of public access to firearms and the benefits and risks associated with this freedom. Most people do not carry a weapon at all and may question others who do because of the moderately low risk of being a victim of a crime. Those how carry however like to think “Better to have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.”

The 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, outlining the right for any citizens to bear arms, is considered a cornerstone of our culture, but given how weapons have advanced so much since the amendment was drafted, is the “right to bear arms” truly ethical? In the past several decades, the United States has witnessed an unprecedented number of mass shootings (372 in 2015 alone), increasing in deadliness as citizens gain access to more advanced tech. Despite the frequency of these shootings and the number of victims killed, there has been little effective action taken to curtail these shootings in the United States. While liberals argue that the solution is strict gun regulation, conservatives claim that it infringes on the rights guaranteed by the 2nd amendment. Effectively, we’re forced to ask whether our right to own weapons is ethical in light of these tragedies where many innocent lives are lost. In good faith, I will argue in favor of the liberal argument of strict gun laws.

The right to bear arms is in the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. All Americans are given the right to bear arms; however, many have taken this debate to a new level, and the scrutiny of what is allowable by this right is questioned daily. While Americans have a legal right to own a gun, it does not necessarily mean that a person’s morals line up with what was intended by the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The Second Amendment was established to protect the right to bear arms. A concealed carry permit allows a gun owner to bring their weapons on their person or in their vehicles. However, if a privately-owned parking lot does not allow for a car to be parked with the gun in it, the gun owner should abide

I will attempt to explore issues with regard to firearms regulation, what is possibly unconstitutional or just unwise. The bedrock of any discussion must include acknowledgement that the right to keep and bear arms is protected by the Bill of Rights. Attempts to diminish our rights should not be done based on analogies to activities which are privileges (such as a driver’s license to operate a motor vehicle on a public highway.) Few suggest that a church must have a permit to operate or that your home is your castle only if you meet some bureaucrat’s

The Supreme Court’s decision in this case will determine the power of states and municipalities control the possession of handguns. The Supreme Court discussed the topic of self-defense and personal safety in relation to this case. They discuss that infringement of the second amendment would inherent the basic human right of self-defense. Several California district attorneys added that handguns in particular are especially useful weapons to defend the average citizen or their property against criminals to keep the basic human right of self-defense still in

Because of many incidents involving handguns, and any other type of gun, the government has been trying to push a gun ban law. As a result of this rumor and possible law, there have been numerous outbursts of support and resistance. Some people believe that banning firearms would be a benefit to our nation’s safety and its population’s safety, while others oppose this proposal and say that guns are not the ones that need to be controlled, people should be the ones that are controlled. During this decision, people from different organizations have expressed their own views and thoughts. Gun control has both positive and negative effects on U.S. citizens.

Some people like to shoot guns for hunting, some like to shoot them for recreation. Whatever the reason, when using guns, there are steps you need to take to be safe, whether shooting or storing them.

Case Study 8.4, “Have Gun, Will Travel…to Work,” is a case study about employees having the right to have and keep guns in their cars at their place of employment. The Second Amendment and gun control have become an extremely argumentative issues due to the mass shootings that have been occurring in our country. There have been legislations that were passed in regards to gun control. As stated in the Case Study 8.4, the Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms but it does not give us a constitutionally protected right to carry our firearms. However, there are many who would argue that we have a moral and constitutional right to not only own firearms, but to carry them wherever we go. I can honestly agree to disagree with this type of situation, only because in some cases you need to have protection just in case you were to feel your life is in immediate danger. However, some people, such

Talking about basic right in the United State, Owning a gun is one of them. As we know, the second amendment offers people the basic right to owning guns in the United State. The second amendment is the part of United States Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is the collective name for the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. The law of the United States is different with other countries. Under the United States Constitution, there are two different level laws. One is Federal law, other is State law. However, Both Federal law and state law should abidance by the United States Constitution. As a result, the law of gun right is sacred and inviolable in the United State. The United States Constitution guarantees gun right for