Healthcare Malpractice Medical Malpractice occurs when a healthcare professional provides substandard care, whether intentional or unintentional, causing injury or damage to a patient. In order to demonstrate medical malpractice, the plaintiff-patient has the responsibility of the burden of proof. The plaintiff-patient must prove a preponderance of evidence, or clear concise evidence of malpractice by supplying four elements of proof. First the plaintiff must show that the provider owed the patient a professional duty of care. Next the plaintiff has to demonstrate that the professional duty owed to them was violated or breached. After that the plaintiff must demonstrate that injury resulted from the said violation or breach. Finally, the patient …show more content…
The three most common reasons for this are: 1.The employer is responsible for the quality of care at their facility, 2. The employer earns revenue from the negligent individual and, 3. The employer is more finically and economically endowed, usually through liability insurance to afford the cost. There are however a couple of exceptions to vicarious liability. One such exclusion is the intentional misconduct of one patient toward another patient. In this situation the employer or employee had no contribution to the situation. Another exceptions that would apply would be in regard to independent contractors and, or their staff. They are not considered employees of the facility and are generally responsible for their own conduct, however this does excludes "Apparent Agency". Apparent Agency is a term used to describe the inability of a patient to distinguish the contractor from a regular healthcare worker of the facility. In this situation, the employer can still be held vicariously liable if there were no efforts to differentiate them from their own employees. An employer can also be held directly liable for an employee or contractors conduct under the legal concept of negligent selection and retention. This happens when the employer should have either ejected the individual for employment, carried out remediation for deficiencies, or discharged the individual from employment; this creates primary employer
What is malpractice? The given definition is improper, illegal, or negligent professional activity or treatment, especially by a medical practitioner, lawyer, or public official. These cases are occurring more all over the state than they should be due to human era. The people at the hands of doctors are being let down as well as left with disfiguration or even death. These cases are leaving people to question their surgeons as well as the nurses attending with them.
“Medical malpractice occurs when a hospital, doctor or other health care professional, through a negligent act or omission, causes an injury to a patient. The negligence might be the result of errors in diagnosis, treatment, aftercare or health management.” (Admin) One of the most common type of claims that pharmacies face are negligence claims. Negligence is one of the categories that falls under the area of law called Torts. In the Hundley v Rite Aid case, a tort was filed for injuries that were sustained by Gabrielle Hundley after she took medication from an incorrectly filed prescription. The case involved a jury trial verdict involving Gabrielle Hundley, a minor child, against Howard Jones, the pharmacist, and the Rite
Medical malpractice lawsuits are an extremely serious topic and have affected numerous patients, doctors, and hospitals across the country. Medical malpractice is defined as “improper, unskilled or negligent treatment of a patient by a physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or other health care professional” (Medical malpractice, n.d.). If a doctor acts negligent and causes harm to a patient, malpractice lawsuits arise. Negligence is the concept of the liability concerning claims of medical malpractice, making this type of litigation part of tort law. Tort law provides that one person may litigate negligence to recover damages for personal injury. Negligence laws are designed to deter careless behavior and also to
Broadly speaking, malpractice is the failure of a medical professional to fulfill his or her obligation to treat you properly. Unlike other personal injury claims, the juries and judges in malpractice cases must look at the standards set for reasonable medical care. While personal injury cases are based on the responsibilities of a normal person, malpractice cases are based on the responsibilities of a healthcare professional.
For a plaintiff to triumph a claim of medical malpractice for negligence, four elements must be established. The first element is proving the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff. The second is to show that the defendant breached the duty to the plaintiff. The third is to show that the plaintiff was harmed and experienced damages. Finally, the fourth is to show that the plaintiff was harmed by the actions of the defendant (Greenberg, 2009).
malpractice and negligence. The Darling's (Plaintiff) felt that the hospital, nursing staff and emergency room doctor all played an important part in the Plaintiff losing his leg due to neglect.
Contributory Negligence allows the medical professional to seek out negligence of the patients if the root of their injury was sought to be the blame of the patient and not of the medical profession. Thomson Reuters (2015) explains that this negligence can be due to the patient not following directions and mixing up the prescriptions or failure to give
Our text defines a tort as “a civil wrong” and negligence as “a tort, a civil or personal wrong” (Pozgar, 2012). Negligence as it is related to healthcare is an unintentional commission or omission of an act that a reasonably prudent person or organization would or would not do under normal circumstances. Not following a recognized standard of care could be considered negligence. The case I have chosen to study is one from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City Maryland and is that of Enso Martinez a minor by and through his parent (Rebecca Fielding) vs The Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore Maryland July 2013. I would describe this as a landmark, “David vs Goliath” case
In that situation, the negligence perpetrated by the anesthesiologist was an error—possibly an honest mishap or a consequence of carelessness but not deliberate or criminal. One of the primary reasons the patient’s sister filed the lawsuit was the absence of communication and information surrounding what happened when her sister was permanently injured. If the anesthesiologist and archdiocese had spoken honestly and openly to the patient’s sister, it might have safeguarded them from litigation. In this case study, the archdiocese and the anesthesiologist could have “come clean” from the beginning. They could have taken responsibility for their mistakes, apologized sincerely, and offered to financially and medically support the patient for the rest of her life. In turn, the patient’s sister may not have sued them, the anesthesiologist would not have covered up his mistake (thereby committing a criminal act), and the admitting nurse would still be a nurse.
Medical malpractice claims have risen dramatically over the past 40 years alongside the financial claim awards (Kessler, 2011). Currently, America’s medical tort system is regulated and enforced primarily by the states (“Medical Tort System,” 2016). The main focus of tort law is to preserve the peace between two parties, to determine fault and discourage wrong doing (Pozgar, 2016). Most physicians today carry medical malpractice insurance to protect themselves from the high defense costs of claims and potential financial awards (Kessler, 2011). As the number of medical claims increase and jury awarded punitive damage skyrocket, medical malpractice insurance premiums have also risen dramatically (Kessler, 2011). Malpractice insurance
Medical malpractice happens when a hospital, doctor or other health care professional, perform negligence through their practice and causes an injury to a patient, it may be the result of mistakes in diagnosis, management and after care or health management. (Podgers, 2007)
Negligence happens when a “person’s actions fall below a certain level of care. Negligence can involve doing something carelessly or failing to do something that should have been done.” (Fremgen, 2009, p. 35). In order to prove negligence the plaintiff must present the following elements: 1) duty to care, 2) breach of duty to care, 3) injury and 4) causation (Pozgar, 2012, p. 33). Duty to care is the first element which deals with the care that the defendant (physician) owes the plaintiff (the patient).
Similar to most other qualitative study, the sample size of this study is going to be small when compared to other studies in the quantitative realm. The small sample size is sufficient as the qualitative study does not need to meet a designated target to be considered "statistically significant" (Ritchie & Lewis, 2003, p.83) since the one-on-one interview is designed to collect a rich source of data (Ritchie & Lewis, 2003). As a result, with the large amount of data, there is no need for a large sampling size as no new data will be found uncovered (Ritchie & Lewis, 2003). With that said, the study is hoping for at least 15 participants.
If what the person in question did met the requirements of what the standard of care calls for, then there has been no account of negligence. There are four main points that actually make up negligence. There must first be a situation in which the standard of care must be given under the given circumstances. Failing to follow the standard of care begins the case of negligence. After not satisfactorily completing the standard, there is an apparent setup for harm to the patient resulting from this failure to meet the requirements of care. When an injury is inflicted on the patient, that relates to the standard of care being violated, and that seals the case. Those are the four ingredients needed to complete a case of negligence (Cazalas 18).
One implication of the medical malpractice crisis is that specialists in high risk fields are considering and/or leaving their practice which is drastically affecting the quality of patient care; treatment for patients who need specialists is declining rapidity (Cline & Pepine). Insurance rates are so high that many doctor’s either can’t afford it and/or do not think it is worth staying in the practice. Patients are often forced to travel long distance for a specialist; waiting long hours at an overcrowded doctor’s office with less efficiency in the quality of medical care (Cline & Pepine).