preview

Hopkins V. Price Waterhouse

Decent Essays

Hopkins v. Price-Waterhouse is a very detailed case, that features many aspects of the patriarchy, and lingering ways of thinking about gender that are hopefully being phased out of modern society. The Supreme Court chose not to make a ruling, which was the right decision in a legal sense, though there was more proof that Hopkins was discriminated against. Ann Hopkins was such a success in Price-Waterhouse; she was hired specifically by the United States State Department to handle a massive contract job. Bringing such business to her employers would, in theory be a huge positive for the company. So, as she approached the time that was appropriate to become a partner in her accounting firm, she applied, and the first time, she was rejected. As partnership is not guaranteed, Hopkins could take this decision, though almost certainly a huge disappointment for Hopkins. However, the second time she applied and was rejected, she felt her rejection was not based on her quality at her job, and sued. In all the information that was released as part of her rejection to become a partner of the firm, there is both information that substantiates, and does not support Hopkins’ claim. For the former, her bosses openly stated in documents that she needed to go to charm school, not a trait necessary for her job, but a trait expected of women. This shows the difference in expectations between men and women, if a man was not charming at the firm, it would likely not be an issue. But,

Get Access