preview

Southern Manifesto Argument Essay

Satisfactory Essays

The government can not change the rules if those rules are not in place in the first place. Southern Manifesto is a very big argument whether or whether not racial segregation was in place in school. Although it does not state that in the constitution Southern Manifesto was a document published in 1956 and written by Richard Russell Jr., Lyndon B Johnson, and Strom Thurmond. The Southern Manifesto was a document about the attempt to rebel and push back the Brown vs Board of Edu. Southern Manifesto’s purpose was to have racial segregation in public areas. Brown vs Board of Edu. states that it is illegal to have racial segregation in school. The argument was very strong because the constitution does not state anything about education. Because the constitution did not state anything about education there was not a whole lot that government could do to stop these actions from happening. In the case, they bring up past cases like Plessy vs Ferguson to help back up their case. Plessy vs Ferguson, this case was about having segregation laws. The Southern Manifesto used this to help support their case by looking into the past and looking how it was a good time for them, not looking how it was an awful time for some other people. In a way if I were to take my bias away from my view over this case, I could see how people were not feeling the same way …show more content…

Roberts vs Boston was a case where a little five-year-old girl named Sarah Roberts attended an all black school which was eventually too far for her dad to drive to, there for her dad enrolled her into an all-white school, but when she attended the school the white parents would not allow their kids to go to the school while she is there. I really could not see why this would be a problem but if I must look into their eyes to see their view, they were taught that these people are different and could be

Get Access