preview

How Did Martin Luther King Impact The Civil Rights Movement

Decent Essays

Andrew Young once said, “There's no problem on the planet that can't be solved without violence. That's the lesson of the civil rights movement.” This era was full of injustice towards colored people of America. The Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s was when colored people fought for their rights in various ways. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X were two civil rights leaders who had incredibly different techniques in achieving these goals. Dr. King’s philosophy included using non-violent approaches to gain rights for blacks; Malcolm X’s beliefs were for colored people to make their own communities and protect themselves by “any means necessary”. Martin Luther King’s philosophy made more sense during the Civil Rights Movement …show more content…

Martin Luther King, Jr. states, “Along with the march as a weapon for change in our nonviolent arsenal must be listed the boycott” (King Document 6). He is showing one technique of nonviolent protest during the Civil Rights Movement. Boycotting a store or business would cause change because not buying from an establishment affects them negatively. This would cause for the store owners to change their rules and allow colored people, therefore demonstrating the impact of King’s non-violent methods. Another way King was able to create change was through peaceful protests, “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by their character” (King Document 2). This is an example of an organized march that took place in the 1960s. The March on Washington succeeded in creating change and was another way people could resist nonviolently. In addition, Dr. King boycotted Montgomery Buses along with many others, “We are here, we are here this evening because we're tired now. And I want to say that we are not here advocating violence. We have never done that….The only weapon that we have in our hands this evening is the weapon of protest. That's all.” (King The Montgomery Bus Boycott). He started non-violent …show more content…

Malcolm X states that he believes African Americans, “should protect ourselves at any means necessary when we are attacked by racists” (Malcolm X Document 9). If the colored people used violence they would be seen as the “bad guy”. King states, “Violence may go to the point of murdering the hater, but it doesn’t murder hate. It may increase hate. Violence…doesn’t solve any problems.” (King Document 8). Martin Luther King, Jr. is saying that if someone kills a hater, that someone doesn’t stop the hate. Hate will still continue in the world and the person who killed the hater is now a murderer. Plus, murder is violence. Violence can solve nothing because violence just creates more evil. So, if the colored people fought back they would be creating more violence. Using peaceful ways of protest, such as, speeches which can be a way to protect themselves and get their point across. Malcolm believes in the separation of races instead of integration, “We encourage Afro-American themselves to establish experimental institutes and educational workshops, liberation schools and child-care centers in Afro-American communities” (Malcolm X Document 5). This would be unsustainable for a long period of time because it goes against human nature of wanting to stay together. Dr. King said that

Get Access