How Did Rome Win Battles

The legions of Rome were one of the biggest factors in Rome's success as an empire. They conquered vast quantities of land, and were often used by the government to improve the morale of people living in cities, which often had parts that were cramped and unsanitary. The legions were set apart from contemporary armies due to their level of organisation and especially as they fought as a unit and not as individuals, as many tribes did.

When we think about the historical significance of Rome, it comes down to its leaders and how these leaders ruled in their era. Confidence, commitment, inspiration, intuition, and creativity, are all essential traits that a ruler must possess. In my opinion, no one has demonstrated these important characteristics better than Caesar Augustus, or better known as Octavian. Octavian showed how good of administrator he was, which was well needed after years of civil strife and social unrest. On the other hand, military genius, Julius Caesar, was lacking in administrative qualities which infect, lead his era to have a period of civil war and bloodshed.

…. He became one of the best speakers in Rome, and by care and application, was able to surpass those who were more highly gifted by nature. …. often when Pompey and Cicero and Caesar were reluctant to speak, he undertook the whole management of the case himself, thereby gaining an advantage over them in popularity, since people thought of him as a man willing to take trouble to help others.

The military prowess of Roman commanders and legionaries proved to be successful enough to turn a small community into an ancient super power. There are many discussions to be had about the tactics and success of the Roman army, some of which are: their style of fighting, the attitude toward the fight, and the fruits of their war.

Julius Caesar was greatly admired by his soldiers and citizens. Julius Caesar won the support of his soldiers through his military leadership and strategy. With his military, he strengthened and expanded the state of Rome.

Have you ever waged war against your wife? Caesar Octavian Augustus did. Augustus was a great leader. Leaders are necessary because they need to show leadership amongst the people and unite the people as one doing anything to keep them safe. Caesar Octavian Augustus was one of Rome’s greatest leaders by showing that at the age of 19, he can rule one of the most powerful nations by any means including war (http://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/empire/augustus.html)

Most of the time in his papacy was consumed with arguing with Theodora over a heresy. Perhaps this was his largest contribution to the church, he proved that monophysitism was a false heresy. In addition, he did not take away from the Church, and he did not start any unneeded wars. However, he was taken out of office by brute force, because of this Rome was besieged, and was also banished which was not good publicity for the Church. Overall, he fought against a false belief that he successfully proved wrong. He was a good Pope because he fought against a false belief and did not hurt the catholic

There are many Roman emperors and there are a few that people see as experiencing success. In a recent survey by worldaffairsboard.com Augustus, Marcus Aurelius and Trajan were voted as the best. Septimius Severus who was also a great emperor was not even on the list. There are many things that go into making a good emperor such as military strength, taxes and life of the people in Rome. Septimius Severus was a great emperor because he had many of these needed qualities. He had some admirable wins in war and also helped the Roman Empire to grow. Septimius Severus greatly improved life for soldiers in the army and also did great things for people in Rome. During his tenure as emperor of Rome he made many improvements that greatly helped

Romans remember him for his massive contribution to the empire by actively taking part in projects involving building where he built one of the greatest walls in the world knows as the Hadrian’s Wall. Even though he spent much time travelling and away from Rome

Recovering most of the land it lost in its fight for independence, Rome was initially united with the Latin cities on a basis of equality by Spurius Cassius and was part of the Latin League, where the Latins could appoint the dictators (Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica, 1998). However, as the Romans grew in power, the Latins grew cynical of Rome's ambitions of domination over Latin confederacy and demanded absolute equality with Rome, which, according to William C. Morey (2009a), was "scornfully rejected" (para. 7). As a result, the Great Latin War broke out between Rome and Latium, amid Rome's rejection of the Latins' attempts of independence, and lasted for 2 years between the years 340 to 388 B.C. (Morey, 2009a). Ultimately, Rome won the Great Latin war and started the Roman policy of isolation, breaking up the Latin League to eliminate the frequent Latin revolts through dealing with each Latin town distinctively (Morey, 2009a). The Romans treated the Latin towns differently, as they deemed some of them to qualify for exercising the right of Roman citizenship and the others were only granted partial citizenship or were treated as mere subjects of the Roman Republic (Morey, 2009a).

Many Roman citizens, were hoping that Caesar would re-establish the constitution and make the laws and courts function again after the Civil War had ended. As Caesar dominated more enemies, his popularity with the people of Rome rose increasingly to new heights. His military victories were seen as something that gave him ultimate political popularity and extended his claim as a true leader of Rome. His military reputation is what assisted Rome in succeeding into one of the greatest ancient empires in history. His military campaigns are what helped grow in both size and power.

became the protector of the Roman people. His backbone of his power was his army but

In his book The Battle That Stopped Rome, the writer Peter S. Wells talks about how the battle in Teutoburg Forest has changed the history of Rome and the European nations a whole. In the first part of his book, the author speaks about how the written papers like manuscripts or copies of scripts help the scholar in the Middle ages understand what really happens in the period of that battle. And he also talks about other archeological evidence help scholars to understand what really take place in the battle in the second part of his book. Finally, in the last part of his book, Peter S. Wells tells the reader about the meaning of the Teutourg Forest and the reason why Rome lost its battle to the nomadic tribe. And he talks about how the battle influenced the Rome empire and the Europe in social lives as well in the conclusion part of his book. Between the first part and last part

Julius Caesar is and was one of the most influential people in history. He created laws, stuck wars, and developed new strategies for leadership and battles. "Caesar is widely considered to be one of the greatest military geniuses of all time, as well as a brilliant politician and one of the ancient world's strongest leaders (Julius Caesar pg.1)." He transformed the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire and he extended his land all the way through Gaul to The Atlantic Ocean, as well as fighting a civil war and being proclaimed as dictator for life.

although he was a fearless and effective leader in battle, he was completely impossible as a person and thus only earned the respect but not the love of the people of Rome