People are impacted by outside factors, by events that occur around them. Many times so called “big” events impact the so called “little” or ordinary people. There are individuals who dispute this claim, and assert that “the decisions of the great [do not] affect little people at all.” While this may seem like an accurate stance to hold, the Battle of Hastings provides evidence against this. The Battle of Hastings “represented a turning point in English life for serfs, the old nobility, the English language, justice, tenure, and religion,” and thus greatly impacted the lives of ordinary folk in England. The Battle of Hastings was fought in 1066, and its outcome greatly impacted England. After Edward the Confessor, the king of England, died, three men argued over who should inherit the throne. Harold Godwinson assumed the throne, while Harald Hardrada, King of Norway, and Duke …show more content…
Since King Harold had defeated Harald Hardrada, the King of Norway, this battle “marked the end of any real Viking threat to the fortunes of Europe.” This affected the lives of common folk, who did not than have to worry about being raided by the Vikings. Another more immediate effect of William the Conqueror’s victory was that England was now ruled by the Normans. This directly changed the destiny of the common people because the Normans “demanded more work, more dues, and a tighter interpretation of [the common farmer’s] legal standing and relations to the manor lord.” The local common people also viewed the Normans were foreigners, especially because they spoke English with an accent, or differently than that of the common folk. Others changes resulting from the Battle of Hastings were that “the local court was now more imposing and introduced trials by ordeal for cases that could not be resolved in any other way.” This effect on the judicial system also impacted the lives of the ordinary
On the 14th of October 1066, Duke William of Normandy defeated King Harold at the Battle of Hastings. His win could be summed up by the fact that William was a better leader. Other factors that contributed to William’s victory include: William was better prepared, the English army was severely weakened as Harold had just fought off an invasion in the North of England, and Harold made a fatal mistake of prematurely entering the Battle of Hastings.
they were organized and knew what to do when the time came to set sail
On the 14th of October, the Saxon and Norman forces clashed in the Battle of Hastings. Harold took up a defensive position on Senlac Ridge. The Norman army was forced to attack uphill, placing them at a disadvantage.
The Norman Conquest by Marc Morris is a narrative of the Norman invasion of 1066. Since the events happened so long ago, there are many incomplete accounts of the events. Even these incomplete accounts are usually heavily biased. As such, it is a difficult undertaking for a historian to construct a cohesive summary of the period. Nevertheless, Marc Morris attempted the task, and did an admirable job. It is written as a narrative, but has enough detail to satisfy a student of history.
Harold Godwinson was born in the 1022s to a powerful Anglo-Saxon family in Wessex, United Kingdom. Throughout his life, he achieved many great things, including being the last Anglo-Saxon to be crowned King of England and being the Earl of Wessex. He was at the top of the social structure from the 6th of January 1066 until his death fighting the Norman Invaders on the 14th of October at the Battle of Hastings. The Battle of the Hastings was a major event during this time period and marked the beginning of the Norman Conquest of England.
William the conqueror in the battle of hastings. September 27 is when things started going William’s way, the wind shifted and started moving them right into England. Directly after reaching shore William decided to make his move and as stated in the document "William I." “William rallied the fleeing horsemen, however, and they turned and slaughtered the foot soldiers chasing them. On two subsequent occasions, William’s horsemen feigned retreat, which fooled Harold’s soldiers, who were then killed by their opponents. Harold’s brothers were also killed early in the battle. Toward nightfall the king himself fell, struck in the eye by an arrow according to Norman accounts, and the English gave up.” (par.1) this quote shows that William knew what he was doing and did the right thing and also that he wasn’t scared. William was about to become a ruler of another country.
Arguably the most important factor in the exertion of power over the English was the ability by the Normans to act militarily. The warlike attitude of the Normans, combined with the religious aspects that will be discussed later, provided them with a ready and capable army with which to support William’s claim to the throne. The early years of William’s rule, after the 1066 defeat of Harold, emerged as a sort of military occupation within England by the Normans. These years were crucial in the Norman advance within England. When William came to England he arrived with a large support of military men and much of these supporting military men remained in England because of their military duties. This army aided William not only in the initial battle against Harold, but later as well, through their
The Battle of Hastings happened on the 14th of October 1066 in East Sussex - which is outside of Hastings. The battle was between Harold Godwinson and William, duke of Normandy. There are three main reasons why William won the Battle of Hastings; this is because William had a ‘head start’ and he also has cavalry. The main reason he won was because during the battle William ordered his foot soldiers to run away so that the English would go downhill after them.
A person who has a voice over a certain group of people will impact only those people. Harriet Tubman, for example, had a huge impact on the slave community. She was known as the “Moses”, leading them to safety. Slave owners did not feel elated at this idea. Their plan was to hunt down and bring back their slaves. Tubman’s actions did not settle in the Southern American community. Eventually, slavery was abolished. But, there are some people today in
King Alfred was known as the best Anglo-Saxon rulers. "Alfred was someone who has had greatness thrust upon him." Alfred was the only surviving Anglo-Saxon province. Almost being apart of the Vikings, he had stayed strong and won a decisive victory in The Battle of Edington. "Alfred promoted himself as the defender of all Christian Anglo-Saxons against the pagan Viking threats. "As his reputation "as a learned and merciful man of a gracious and levelheaded nature who encouraged education and improved his kingdom's legal systems, military structure and his people's quality of life" he was known as the greatest Anglo-Saxons to ever
In this essay I am writing about why William Duke of Normandy won the battle of Hastings.
This chronicle describes several instances in which Viking forces continuously and ruthlessly confronted Alfred the Great; once one army is disbanded another Viking army attacked. This sentiment is evident in the following lines: “As soon as they came to the mouth of the Stour, then met them sixteen ships of vikings, and they fought against them, and captured all the ships, and slew the men. When they werere turning homeward with the booty, a great naval force of vikings met them, and then fought against them on the same day.” Despite the constant threat the Vikings poised to Alfred the Great and his forces, each Viking aggression had been conclusively defeated yet these victories were not without a valiant effort on the part of Alfred and his forces. This chronicle concludes on Alfred’s success by stating: “In the same year King Alfred restored London; and all the Angle raceturned to him that were not in the bondage of the Danish
Henry VIII realized that he needed to expand his territory in France, so in 1513 Henry VIII and his troops invaded France. They defeated France, and this battle came to be known as the Battle of the Spurs. At the time of this battle the Scottish invaded England as an attempt to distract Henry VIII from invading France. The Scottish’s attempt failed to get Henry VIII’s attention. Not long after this event, the Scottish were defeated at the Battle of Flodden Field. The battle between England and Scotland went from 1513-1517.
Duke William of Normandy won the battle because he was well prepared, had enough to time to organize, rest, had good weapons and had a well trained army including archers, infantry and Calvary. In total, William had approximately 7500 men ready to battle whereas King Harold unfortunately had only 4500 voluntary village people who volunteered to battle and only five hundred professionally trained soldiers. They prepared carefully for the battle. The Normans had knights on horseback (Calvary) who were skilful fighters. William also was skilful and ambitious, and he was determined to be King of England. In the Bayeux Tapestry, it shows William’s army preparing for battle, embarking huge ships filled with wood and supplies such as wine, weapons, and horses. There are also pictures of the knights in full battle armour riding out to war. William’s men also had better armour and weapons, for example: the cavalry were all equipped with mail hauberk, there is some evidence that archers used crossbows in addition to bows and arrows, some battle maces were also used along with spears and swords, round shields and kite shaped shields. This meant that the Normans were more protected from the English, than the English were
After Alfred the Great and his son successfully ruled England, many of the kings that followed them were not as successful. Eventually, under the rule of Ethelred, the Vikings took over England again. As the years progressed, and the Anglo-Saxons lived together with the Vikings, they began to all began to think of themselves as English. This understanding meant no more Viking troubles, right? Well, not exactly. When Edward the Confessor ruled England, he had no sons. Because of this, several men wanted to inherit the throne. Harold, a nobleman from Wessex, gained support from many of those in power throughout England. William, the duke of Normandy (in France), thought that since he was a distant cousin of Edward the people should crown him the next English king. When Harold’s boat shipwrecked on the coast of Normandy, William deviously welcomed Harold into his castle. He prepared a feast and afterwards made Harold promise he would give the throne to William.