Thomas Jefferson, as a founder of the Republican party, believed that the power of government should be interpreted strictly by following the Constitution. He rejected the Federalist belief that certain powers were implied in the constitution. If it was not clearly stated in the Constitution, it was not authorized. By being under a strict interpretation of the Constitution, a tyrannical form of government could be avoided. The central government should have limited powers because a strong central government would limit the state’s rights, therefore a weak central government was needed to do so. Through this Democratic form of government, the role of the national government would be limited, the states would have more power; therefore, power would come from the people enabling the protection of the rights of citizens. …show more content…
He could not pass up a great opportunity of new land being added to their nation. This deal turned out to be one of the greatest real estate purchases ever made. It would double the size of the United States, make westward expansion possible, remove European presence, and supply more resources. However, being a strict Constitutionalist, Jefferson faced the conflict of the negotiation’s constitutionality. If Jefferson chose to go through with the Purchase, he would be abandoning his beliefs and implying that the Federalists’ idea of a loose interpretation of the constitution was the correct way to govern. Thereby, Jefferson would have to take a broader view of the Constitution, an idea that he strictly opposed. As a result of the Purchase, Jefferson lost his principals: strict constitutionalism and state’s rights for the country’s
During the time period of 1801 to 1817, there were multiple issues in the United States ranging from wars to political boundaries. This time period saw the termination of the Federalist party. The conflicts were between two parties called the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Federalist party was officially started by John Adams. John Adams was also a loose constructionist just like all the other Federalists. Federalists were in favor of a strong central government. On the other side, was Thomas Jefferson who was in office from 1801 to 1809. Jefferson started the Jeffersonian Republican party. The Jeffersonians were strict constructionists who believed in states rights. They said that anything that is not stated in
In contrast, the Democratic Republicans put large amounts of power directly in the hands of the people. Jefferson believed “in the common sense of mankind in general” and distrusted the central government. Democratic Republicans feared the tyranny of an all-powerful national government capable of operating unchecked and unchallenged without the consent of the people. However, their fears were largely unwarranted; the Constitution would not allow for such an oppressive government to exist—even if interpreted loosely—because of the numerous checks and balances put into place by the Founding Fathers. They ensured that the Federal government would always perform the will of the people. However, Jefferson would not compromise and insisted on preaching his outmoded conspiracy theories. Jefferson even went so far as to say, “Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers…alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories.” Unfortunately, this apprehensive philosophy did not work very well for the American people at all; it encouraged the development of factions, an
The Jeffersonian Democracy, name after Thomas Jefferson, favored a small, limited federal government that did not interfere with the individual state rulings. Thomas Jefferson also opposed the idea of a national bank. He preferred to limit the control of government as much as possible. This group is also known as the Democratic-Republican party. Jefferson did not like to idea of an industrialized economic plan. He strongly believed in the expansion of agriculture. Therefore, he was not against slavery. The majority of Jefferson's supporters were land owners and farmers because they approved of his idea to expand agriculture. Due to the fact the Federalist were not on common ground, the election of Thomas Jefferson by the Democratic-Republic
During Washington’s presidency, Jefferson and Madison’s views contradicted Hamilton’s Federalist ideals. For example, the Republicans believed in a small central government. Therefore, Jefferson initially viewed the Bank of the United States to be unconstitutional because it was beyond the power of the national government. (Doc A) Then in the Virginia Resolution, Madison describes the compact theory and how states have the right to limit the national government based on the constitution. (Doc C) On the other hand, Hamilton supported a strong central government that could enforce the law and uphold the constitution. (Doc B)
Thomas Jefferson changed America in many drastic ways, especially in terms of the separation of power between the government and the people, the government within itself. It only remained the same regarding the foreign relations policies, which were carried on from the Washington and Adams Presidencies. Under Jefferson’s anti-federalist views, policies were made to reduce the power of the federal government, such as removing internal laws and reducing the size of the army and navy. They were removed because they threatened the people’s “civil liberties” and their control over the government. He also supported policies for increased land ownership, ultimately giving more people the eligibility to vote. This gave more power to the people rather
Other than this there was nothing about the purchase of new territory in the Constitution. Jefferson had to use implied powers again to justify the purchase. Jefferson in his second inaugural address said, “I know that the acquisition of Louisiana had been disapproved by some from a candid apprehension that the enlargement of our territory would endanger its union. But who can limit the extent to which the federative principle may operate effectively?” Jefferson basically said that there are some cases in which to keep the federal government operating effectively some rules need to be broken when necessary. He abuses the fact that the Constitution isn’t clear about the purchase of new lands to buy Louisiana and doing so he goes against his strict view of the Constitution.
Following the first inauguration within the newly recreated constitution tailored to the liking of all participating states, the well tough words on the paper were put into effect of the reality of bureaucratic system. Fearing the recreation of the tyrant that they finally broke free from, the people of America were sceptic about giving authority to a central government. Realizing from the failure of the Articles of Confederation, the people surrendered to the fact that an authoritative central government was indeed needed. Although giving into the demands of reality, the people were still tied to their fears. Although seemingly well phrased in the constitution, the limits of the authority given to the central government once again became an issue that developed two primary political views. The Republican Party
President Thomas Jefferson purchased Louisiana territory from the French government for fifteen million dollars in 1803. The Louisiana Purchase nearly doubled the size of the Unites States and stretched from The Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to New Orleans. Jefferson strongly believed that the key to a nation’s health was expanding westward. He believed that a republic needed an independent and virtuous citizenry for its survival, along with the belief that independence and virtue went together with land ownership, specifically the ownership of small farms. If Jefferson was to provide enough land for the yeomen, the United States would have to expand more. The most defining themes in nineteenth century American history is the westward expansion.
Jefferson was delighted with the deal. At the same time, he had a problem. The Constitution nowhere states that the President has the power to purchase land from foreign countries. Adding the huge Louisiana Territory would drastically change the nation. In the end, Jefferson decided that he did have the authority to purchase Louisiana. The Constitution allowed the president to make treaties. The Senate approved the treaty, and Congress quickly voted to pay for the land.
In the article, “We are All Federalist, All Republicans,” Max Lerner lays out many of Thomas Jefferson's positive attributes, I believe his greatest trait, however, is his ability to be flexible and make decisions according to the specific situation. Jefferson is a man of contradiction in many aspects, a display of his contrarian nature unfolds as he states his preference for a written news publication over government, yet he aggressively attempts to censor publications critical of himself(Lerner). The kind of flip flopping on issues in which Jefferson partakes would make him a modern punching bag in our current political climate, yet his trait of changing positions led to one of the largest legacies of his presidency, The Louisiana Purchase.
Jefferson, as a non- Federalist, believed that Hamilton’s national bank was unconstitutional and decided to abandon that policy, trim the federalist budget, and cut taxes. Jefferson, as a Democratic-Republican, did not like or trust the government due to its limit on the freedom of the individuals, but he acknowledged the necessity. Jefferson believed in a democracy where the people and the states had most of the power, which was a great step away from the policies the federalists had been putting in place.
Political philosophies amongst Federalist and Democratic Republicans have been much conflicted throughout the years. The Federalist who was led by Alexander Hamilton were seeking to increase the power of the central government then there was the Republicans who were led by Thomas Jefferson whom were seeking to decrease the power of the central government. The Federalists advocated the importance of a strong central government to protect the republic from “the imprudence of democracy” leading the country forward, while the Democratic Republicans promoted increasing the common man’s role in government. Although both political parties had good intentions for the future of the United States, the Federalist Party was much more effective at uniting
In the various public offices, Jefferson sought to establish a federal government of limited powers. Jefferson didn’t hesitate to employ the powers of government to fellow opponents. He criticized when it came to the growth of federal power. He worked for a responsible and effective government. He waged a war of resistance against “Hamilton’s financial system and, upon leaving government, launched the first American political party to oppose the Washington administration”. Jefferson sought to reduce the size of bureaucracy and the military, lower taxes, enhance majority rule, and center the nation in his vision of an agrarian republic. While president, Jefferson's principles were tested in many ways. For example, to purchase the Louisiana Territory from France he was willing to expand his narrow interpretation of the Constitution. But Jefferson stood firm in ending the importation of slaves and maintaining his view of the separation of church and
During his time, industry was developing and commerce increased a great deal. According to him, families could produce commodities they needed and avoid relying on factories and money for everything they wanted. Urbanization however had appeared and he realized that his dream was not going to be achieved. During his time factories came up due to technology brought by European immigrant’s factories came up to make agriculture easier as transport also developed dramatically (Harness, 2007). The transformation-taking place in America was not the kind that Jefferson had visualized. The transport for example developed and connected states
In the mind of Thomas Jefferson, his idea was lessen the government due to it not needing to be a need. Humans had responsibilities that had to be trusted to apply their own affairs. As for Jeffersonian Democracy has never been described more economically or elegantly than in Thomas Jefferson's inaugural address in 1801. The federal government would cultivate "peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none." But there were requirements for constitutions, too, and the executive power occupied a central place in Jefferson's constitutionalism. In July 1789, for example, Jefferson described the U.S. Constitution as organizing the legislative, executive, and judicial departments of government around the