How Do Microbeads Affect The Environment

On March 4, 2015, the Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 was introduced to the United States House of Representatives. Sponsored by Democratic Representative of New Jersey Frank Pallone, the bill called to amend “the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to ban rinse-off cosmetics that contain synthetic plastic microbeads beginning on January 1, 2018” (congress.gov, H.R. 1321). The bill was then passed with amendments to it in the House in December, with Senate passing it a week later by unanimous consent. The Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 is unlike a lot of bills that have attempted to pass through the House and the Senate because it did not face the all-too-common gridlock that one can expect nowadays from the United States Congress. Pallone said to the New York Times that although he was surprised by the quick success of the bill, it passed simply because it had a lot of support in the House and the Senate and did not have much opposition (New York Times).

Jellyfish can be seen in freshwater and saltwater inhabiting everywhere it goes. Some may see jellyfish depicted in media such as the television show “SpongeBob SquarePants” as a fun recreational sport of catching Jellyfish in butterfly nets. Though most may recognize the creatures as your worse nightmare on a beach and avoiding getting stung by them. However, researchers and explorers have found effects that jellyfish have on impacting the ecosystem and life style of others. These findings have shown a divide between the benefits and negative outcomes they have.

Lionfish are negative towards their environment. Lionfish are negatively effecting the environments of North Carolina. Lionfish are an invasive species that harm other creatures, their surroundings, and the overall environment. Lionfish have not been here for too long, but they have already caused a lot of problems in their new environments. Lionfish arrived in the United States around the 1990’s.

Corporations using microbeads in soaps are harming the Great Lakes because they slip through many water treatment plants going right down our drains. These microbeads are a major part of plastic pollution harming the Great Lakes and the world's oceans. Fish think these microbeads are food which ultimately ends up hurting the fish in one way or another. Knowing this Kathleen developed an all natural solution that is not only healthy for the environment but also healthy for humans. In her, all natural soaps Kathleen uses oatmeal instead of using the microbeads. Replacing the microbeads for oatmeal is a perfect example of how Soulful Earth Herbals is promoting a positive impact on life below water.

Dr. Trisha Farrelly, an environmental anthropologist at Massey University in New Zealand, supported the call to ban glitter because it is microplastic. These are fragments of plastic smaller than 5 millimeters in length. There are estimates that up to 51 trillion fragments of microplastics are in the world’s oceans, The Independent reported.

The problem topic being analyzed is the Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 PL 114-114. The law discusses, in detail about, amending Section 301 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 331). It adds on to that law by putting in the following into an act, “To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the manufacture and introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of rinse-off cosmetics containing intentionally-added plastic microbeads.” Microbeads are “any solid plastic particle that is less than 5 millimeters in size.” The reason behind banning the microbeads in “rinse-off cosmetics” is due to the fact that they are doing more harm than good, especially to the environment and our water across the U.S. The beads are continually adding plastic to the oceans causing toxins and problems for the marine environment. Microbeads are not only impacting the oceans, but the groups and people all over the world.

These two materials, in particular, are dangerous to local ecologies and populations. Thus, there is not only an identified need to reduce the use of these two materials, but also a need to increase recycling of these two materials.

Have you ever wanted to wear a hat at school and not pay a dollar? It’s really annoying that you have to pay 1$ to wear a hat on occasional days. Yes they can be a distraction but can’t headbands be a distraction? Also can’t clothing and glasses be a distraction? It would be great if schools could trust us about us not stealing, or wearing other people's hats. And if people did, they would get in trouble and not be able to wear a hat.

is a difficult chemical to escape -- it's in so many plastic products from water bottles and sippy cups to contact lenses and toys. Controversial studies linking BPA to health risks, particularly reproductive risks, prompted companies to go the "BPA-free" route. But new research from the University of California - Los Angeles (UCLA) Health Sciences says not so fast: BPS (Bisphenol S), a replacement for BPA that technically makes products BPA-free, is probably not safe either.

Big things come in small packages. Microbeads are exactly small packages. The denotation for a microbead is plastic pieces or fibres measuring less than 5 millimeters. The small, mighty microplastics are wreaking havoc in our surroundings and even to our own health. The beads are winding up in our ocean and are being eaten by humans.

Body scrubs maybe good for your skin, but not for mother earth. Microbeads, which are present to almost all beauty products, are to blame. Dilyana Mihaylova of conservation organisation Fauna & Flora International stated, 'Microbeads are too small to be filtered out during sewage treatment and invariably flow out to sea, becoming a direct source of pollution. This is a problem because they don't biodegrade and can pose a serious threat to animals, which can easily mistake them for food."

Microbeads are international in Canada, United Stated of America, Europe, and Australia.The microbeads are made of plastic so it does not break down and pose threats to the environment and the nation’s waterways.When you wash polyethylene off with water, the water goes down the waterway carrying tiny bits of plastic ending up in the sea.They're less than a millimeter wide so water filters can not pick them up. Microbeads are a massive issue of marine litter which is causing real problems to marine life; they can cause plastic particle water pollution and pose an environmental hazard for aquatic animals in freshwater and ocean water.In Canada, microbeads were reported to be used when these products are used by consumers

Microbeads are tiny bits of plastic they are frequently used in all sorts of everyday care products such has face wash, toothpaste, and boconcerns dy washes such as scrubs. It can also be found in the food we consumed a lot of cleaning products we use have microbeads in them too. The world has a very large issue with plastic over use. Plastic is an item that nearly all products are made from, we use plastic everyday but is it actually healthy or good for the planet in the long run? Microbeads have come up many times on the New Zealand news over the past few months with people sharing their worries and about microbeads and advising that they should be banned from the country. Scientist are also suggesting that there are not many positives for microbeads and there are far too many very bad consequences for microbeads to be ignored.

Microbeads are tiny plastic particles, about the size of sand particles (< 2mm) that are made of substances such as polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polymethlyl methacrylate (PMMA) or nylon (see Appendix A). They are commonly found in many

In the United States, there are many organisms which are much too small for a human to see with their naked eye, a microscope is needed to view them. These organisms are called microorganisms and can be very helpful in our environment, and even in our bodies. Some microorganisms however, can be extremely harmful, even fatal if a human comes in contact with them. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) one example of these harmful microorganisms is Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa causes over 51,000 infections in hospitals every year, and about 6,000 of those are infections caused by P. aeruginosa which is multidrug resistant (2013). A multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa is a serious threat and the CDC is working diligently to decrease infections and prevent them from occurring because this particular microorganism is resistant to almost all, or all antibiotics (CDC, 2013).