How Internet Is Creating A Global Mass Culture

In this current era, internet is having a massive impact on almost everything, but mostly on culture. Since the high usage of internet began, every individual around the world had something to do daily, which involved an access to internet. Culture on the other hand, had a major impact from the usage of internet, social networking on social culture. The incorporation of culture over the internet is considered as one of finest option, which is available to humankind in this era or technology. Several Countries have used internet as a source to earn money by selling their culture to other countries. The increasing usage of social media platforms has bought a huge change in almost every individual daily activities and social life. Scholars has even named these activities

Individuals of the same ethnic background share the same culture a factor that explains that there, as many cultures as there are ethnic backgrounds across the world. Globalization has, however, led to interaction of people from varied cultural backgrounds. Because of the interaction, globalization has been accused of limiting cultural diversity. It is, however, not the case in reality. The purpose of this paper is to analyze some of the factors that justify that globalization has not limited cultural diversity as its critics say. Thus, globalization should not be viewed as a hindrance to cultural diversity because the best subject of moral concern should be the individual person and not the nation, community or the society.

Digital trends allow people to interact internationally and globally. “Nowadays, music, sport, and culture spread easily across the globe.” (“A Way To Explore and Build Relationships We Wouldn’t Otherwise Form”) Noa Gafni Slaney gives us examples throughout the article showing us how trends begin locally and slowly begin spreading globally. For example “ Chinese artist Ai Weiwei is the darling of the art world. Shakira’s fans go beyond Latin America. And even Black Friday sales are now a global phenomenon. “, said Noa Gafni Slaney. The Internet seeks out opportunities to connect with others.

Does globalisation imply cultural homogenisation? Your answer should consider specific and local global media examples and should include reference to the Appadurai and McChesney article in the course reader.

Taking Sides Issue 2: Does Globalization Threaten Cultural Diversity? Julia Galeota and Philippe Legrain In Taking Sides Issue 2, Julia Galeota and Philippe Legrain argue their side of whether globalization threatens cultural diversity. Thanks to technological advances, people all over the world are better able to communicate with and travel to other countries. This increased interaction leads to a mixing of various cultures known as cultural globalization.

The age of technology is at reach almost everywhere in the world. The world is considered as a “Global Village” wherein the flawless movement of toil, people and data has become a commonplace. It has been internationalized that communication between countries had become a prerequisite. By this, being able to understand its traditions and culture plays a vital role due to its diverse worldviews and often dissimilarity of values. “The ability to prevent potential conflicts and foster productive, cooperative relations will depend largely on effective intercultural relations”. (Communication between cultures, eight edition p. 4 2013)

Some argue that globalization will, on the long term, bring all cultures as a unique Western, if not Americanized, culture, while others argue that some cultures will persist in order to keep their own essence and therefore avoid the homogenization of all cultures. Alongside pure tradition, global conflicts, contradictory political regimes and the diversity of economic systems, some cultures are bound to face issues when trying to fully fit in a global western culture, and that is why cultures are adaptable to one another, but with some limits that we will express in this essay.

Cultural individuality and distinctiveness is the pride of every nation. All communities rejoice in the richness and exoticness of their own cultural symbols, be it dressing, architecture, language or way-of-life. With the dawn of globalization, however, cultural variety and distinguishing characteristics are vanishing; giving rise to a monoculture common to all. While this may be a harbinger of unity and relatedness among all people of the world, it also damages the unique cultural identities they once took pride in. This paper discusses the effects of globalization on culture, along with its positive and negative effects. Since the effects of globalization on culture are non-exhaustive, it is attempted to incorporate a few of the most

The accessibilty of data on the web is anything but difficult to any internet user, as anybody can go onto any web program and hunt down whatever they are searching for, however as this happens it will bring about more issues and/or positives with memory or knowledge. While hunting down data this can expand the knowledge of the specific thing that they are searching for, or certainties that are useful towards the user, with this they can research about their reports, essays and even individuals. With the measure of data individuals put into the web, the more less demanding it is to discover data on users, for instance, if "Richelle" needed to search for a companions birthday, she can seek on google, "Veronica Latu" and a list of sites will show up and undoubtedly will be useful to Richelle to discover Veronica 's birthday on one or numerous destinations. Access to data is essential for education and enhancing lives. Not having access to the web is like not having fundamental tutoring; it extensively

Lastly, religions play an important role too by gathering people scattered across the globe under an identical cosmology, thus creating imagined communities (Anderson, 1983). Globalization, by connecting people through the media, also creates such a community: inhabitants of the world share the idea of a global community and an international identity. This is why we could define globalization as the compression of time and space (Harvey, 1983). Communications as well as people can travel at an ever increasing speed, thereby giving the impression that every corner of the world is at hand. The main thesis about globalization argues that it leads to a phenomenon of homogenization. My hypothesis however is that some cultures are so different and so deeply rooted in their environment that they can't simply be erased. They will be modified, influenced but not standardized under one unique model. This will lead to hybrid products, thereby proving the hypothesis of glocalization, introduced by

There are dangers of online communication such as social networks where users can lie about who they are [4]“Megan thought she was being abused by 16-year-old Josh Evans, she was actually talking to Lori Drew, the 49-year-old mother of one of her former friends who, it is alleged, had set up a fake profile to taunt Megan.” in social networking sites it is very easy for people to

Imagine a world where geographic separation does not inhibit the social or economic mobility of people. A place where cement roads are obsolete and unnecessary and the information super highway is the only road you need to know how to navigate. Information technology becomes the glue and nails that binds our (global) society together. Development becomes a matter of installing fiber-optic wiring, cellular towers and satellite launching. World Bank projects change from road building to wire laying. Now imagine a world where there is no electricity, telephones, computers, roads or other mediums of transportation other than legs and feet. Communication exists on a face-to-face level and nothing more. An individuals’

Defining globalization is a diverse and contested issue, for instance some define it as the worldwide social relations that are intensified and link distant localities in such a way that things that occur locally are shaped by events that are occurring miles away and vice versa. Another definition is that it is a process of expansion and internationalization of interactive structures, networks and discourse (Seidlhofer, 2012). Despite all this differences in the definitions, they are consistent with each other in that globalization can create a word without boundaries in which people from different parts of the world can communicate, interact and share resources effectively with one another. This is made possible via modern information technologies, transportation and communication.

Communication is a force behind globalization due to many reasons. One reason is the internet which has become affiliated with technological advances. According to a Journal of political science it states that, “Technology is an underlying cause, probably the chief underlying cause, of the complex phenomenon of globalization” (Koivukoski 810). Technology is considerably a significant source of globalization. The Internet makes the world narrow and easy to access which can lead to an increase of internet users annually. In order to communicate with anyone through the internet, an individual can just immediately click a button, and even see into their world with the use of webcams. The excessive amount of information over the Internet makes the world a

You see, on the internet every nook and cranny has its own culture. As in real life, the larger the community, the less peculiar the customs. This is both an advantage and a drawback. If small forum lend themselves to cliques, large ones lend themselves to atomization. I find the culture of the internet as fascinating as any, maybe even more so, because on the internet social transaction evolves fast as the internet connection, 234 bits per second.