Introduction What was your “family system” like and how do you believe it has effected you? As I read the text for the week, I cringed at the different parenting styles and the affects it had on me. I was reminded of the parenting style of my father. He was definitely “authoritarian.” I remember how degrading I felt as a child and vowed to never do that to my own children. Was I successful or did I develop another issue, as we see Victor Hinson describe in his own life?
What is Family Systems? According to Murray Bowen, Jay Haley, Don Jackson and Salvador Munichin family systems are “organized wholes with interdependent elements,” homeostasis and circularity (Manglesdorf & Schoppe-Sullivan, 2007. p.60-62). Homeostasis is
…show more content…
Family systems can affect physical, as well as emotional, spiritual, and social development of a child. Studies have shown that economic circumstances have influences on the physical and cognitive development. “Differences in height and weight reflect economic factors within the United States as well” (Feldman, 2014, 2010 . p.205). When children are under nourished, it also affects their cognitive development. Neuroscientists are beginning to understand the link between brain development and cognitive development. Poverty also has an effect on the development of language as well. Studies have found that “by the age of four children of parents that receive welfare were likely to have been exposed to some 13 million fewer words than those in families classified as professionals” (2014, 2010. p.228). Children who have been abused or neglected have trouble socializing with others, they can be aggressive, or withdrawn. Studies have found that they are effected physically as “abuse alters the brain” (p.257). When we think about family systems we also think about parenting styles and the effects they have on the child. The parenting styles that have been studied are the Authoritarian. Authoritarian parenting can be compared to that of a drill sergeant. This style is very controlling and cold. Children who grow up with this type of parent tend to be withdrawn, not friendly (2014, 2010). Permissive parenting provide lax
Over time, many studies have achieved a common objective; to group parenting behaviors into related clusters called parenting styles. Parenting styles, according to a 2007 article in the “Journal of Education and Human Development,” are a mixture of demandingness and responsiveness. Authoritarian parents are
The parenting style in the home will result in differences in the children’s behavior. For example, an authoritarian parent is controlling, punitive and strict. Their rules are not flexible and do not tolerate expressions of disagreement. These
The underlying concepts in the article directly relate to family systems theory. Family systems theory states that all members of a family are reciprocal and impact on one another, all parts of the family change and the family works as a whole instead of a number of smaller sections (Missouri Department of Social Services, 2014). The concept of the interconnected nature of a family is highlighted in this article as it states that children will be impacted by the behaviour and experiences of the parents during early stages of
Authoritarian parents normally do not interact with their children in positive ways and usually install fear into the child. Punishment is usually harsh and given without explanation. Children with authoritarian parents are often anxiety- ridden. Studies have shown that these children have lower self- esteem, show high aggressiveness and typically do less well in school. Permissive parenting consists of high nurture and acceptance, but these parents lack structure and control. These parents look at their children as “free spirits” who need space to learn and grow. Permissive parents are usually inconsistent with discipline. Children with permissive parents normally are impulsive and irresponsible. These children also lack any self- control since none was expected (Sclafani 47).
When I consider family systems, I am reminded of a metaphor I heard while in undergraduate school about a mobile. A mobile is used to soothe an infant, normally placed above a crib or basinet. Each of its parts are in balance, when working correctly, however if one section becomes off balance the objects become out of sync. This is true with families. If each member of the family unit is doing their part, there is complete balance or homeostasis (Henson). This balance is viewed as a healthy family system. However, if one part of the unit becomes off balance, it disrupts the whole unit causing an unhealthy response with possible long term consequences. As families grow, each member plays an equally important role in the family unit. Children learn quickly the importance of relationships and adapt quickly to their environment. No one can deny the family unit is the most complex system in existence.
The attached paper is an overview of The Family Systems Theory. Which is based on the work and research of Dr. Bowen. This is an significant theoretical approach within group counseling and therapy. It focuses on the role and impact of the person 's original family to identify negative patterns. Evidence is used within the paper to showcase the appropriate usage and application of the theory.
What is a healthy family system and what is its relationship to a healthy development? Primarily, a healthy family system is the viewpoint, connection, and the productive relationship between groups of individuals that make up a specific family group. The (2015) basis of the family system to develop in a healthy manner is that all parts of an individual family are functioning as one and all parts of the family are linked and interrelated; they do not stand-alone. In order to understand the family system one must look inside the family structure to see how it is made up and how it interacts within itself and outside influences. The family system is distinctive and each family member’s development is original. The (2015) Family System concept views the entire family and its structure as one entity that is constantly learning, changing and evolving. This essay discusses the viewpoint, connections and relationship development dynamics that make up a family system. (Broderick, P. C., & Blewitt, P. 2015).
In system theory, behaviors and family members responses influence the family pattern and life. Meanings and values are vital components of the
Authoritarian is only one of three parenting styles that Baumrind details. The other two styles include authoritative and permissive. These two variations in parenting styles were seen in the way my relatives and friends’ parents approached parenting. I observed how the parents of my close friend handled parenting. They maintained control over aspects in my friend’s life like school and chores but allowed the freedom to make decisions in areas of social activities. The most striking difference between my parents and my friend’s is the use of reasoning and the expression of warmth. Her parents provided justification behind their commands and or punishments while maintaining a sense of love and affection. The bond and love that is evident between my friend and her parents is not as strong in the relationship between my parents and me. The style that her parents exhibit is known as authoritative because of their focus on some parental control, use of reasoning and warmth. While on the other hand, my cousins raised their children in a completely different manor using a permissive parenting style. While they provide obvious love and affection towards their children, they fail to exert control and regulations. They did not have any real sense of rules in their household. Their children tend to act and do whatever they wanted with little to no repercussions.
In my recent psychology class we studied parenting styles. They are grouped into three different categories; authoritarian, authoritative, and overly permissive. This gave me insight into a couple of different programs I’ve watched on television.Authoritarian parents are parents that set strict rules to keep order and they usually do this without much expression of warmth and affection. “They demand obedience to authority.” (Coon & Mitterer, 2010, p. 91) When the child questions the parent, "Because I said so," is often the response. Parents tend to focus on bad behavior, and not positive behavior, and children are scolded or punished for not after the rules. Authoritative parents help their children learn to be responsible for
Environmental influences can have a major affect on the cognitive development of a child. Due to the significance of financial stability, I chose to investigate how poverty can affect cognitive health. Research has shown over six million children to be on child welfare systems. The same report also showed children raised in poor households were at a higher risk of being abused or neglected. Abuse and neglect can cause children a lifetime of difficulty. Abuse is purposeful cruelty or violence towards someone physically or emotionally. Neglect isn’t purposeful but does hinder growth and development due to failing to care/provide for someone properly. Manifestations of child neglect may include deprivation of food, non-compliance to health care
In the early 1960s, psychologist Diana Baumrid conducted a research, analyzing child-parent behavior, seeking to identify parenting styles. The Baumrid study and other further studies identified four main styles of parenting (Miller, 2010): the authoritative parenting style was characterized by fair rules and consequences; The Authoritarian parenting style was characterized by strict rules and harsh punishment; the permissive parenting style was characterized by minimal rules with little or no consequences; the uninvolved parenting style was characterized by no rules, and parent presence was almost non-existent. In this paper, I’m going to look at the authoritarian style of parenting in an attempt to draw out its characteristics and its immediate and later impacts on children impact.
In this paper, I will examine how parenting style affects an individuals relationship with his or her children. According to Baumrind, there are four main parenting styles, differentiated on levels of support and expectations. This paper focuses on parents with high support and high expectations,who are known as authoritative parents and those who are supportive with low expectations, who are are permissive. These four different styles of parenting lead to very different developmental outcomes for children in social, academic and emotional domains. However, this model does not fully explain parent-child interactions because it neglects to reference the environmental context of the relationship along with any personal differences in temperament of the child. This context introduces complexity such as personality differences, age of child and marital status of the parents. This is an important topic to investigate because of the impact parenting style can have on developmental outcomes for both the immediate child and for future generations.
. Family systems theory is one of many theories that can be used to describe and analyze families. The family systems theory thinks of the family as a whole, not just as individuals. Individuals form a family system through their interaction and communication patterns. When something with an individual changes, it impacts the entire family. This theory emphasized interdependence among family members and says that problems should not be blamed on one individual, but should be looked at in terms of the family context. Individual components join together within a family system to form a whole. When a change occurs, the whole family must adapt to the new situation. This theory is a great way to look at families as a whole. There are seven descriptive features that define a family system which are: interdependence, wholeness, patterns/self-regulation, interactive complexity/punctuation, openness, complex relationships, and equifinality. Using these seven pieces, I will relate them to the family from Pieces of April and how that family uses or fails to use the features.
For example growing up as a child, my family comprised of my mom, dad, grandma, grandpa, and uncle (my mom’s brother) all living under the same roof. Everyone in the family played a part and understood what their role was. The men in the family took care of things such as taking out the trash, occasional cleaning, in the winter they would bring in firewood, and take care of any handiwork that needed to be done. As far as the women, they always went to the grocery store; they took care of the children, prepared meals, and did most of the cleaning. It was what worked for us. Now when my mom got her own home and my dad came along with us (they were never married), the balance in my grandmother’s house was off. There were fewer mouths to feed and less hands helping with the work that needed to be done. It was an odd and awkward time for us but we were able to start our own homeostasis. The family system worked totally different at my mother’s home. My mother was the breadwinner and my dad was the “stay at home dad” and he took care of the housework and me while my mom worked. Either way it still worked out though it was not the same as at my grandparent’s home but everyone was still able to play a part which did not through off our balance. When my parents separated the balance was there but it was all being put on one person now. My mom was the breadwinner; cook, cleaner, babysitter, and handy