Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences

Great Minds A TES Essential Guide to education’s most influential philosophers guide Join the largest network of teachers in the world. Subscribe today. To subscribe to TES: Call: 0844 543 0064 quoting “essential” or Visit: www.tslshop.co.uk/tsl/essential For thousands of free teaching resources visit www.tes.co.uk/teaching-resources www.tes.co.uk Log on and be inspired. WHERE THEORY MEETS PRACTICE A TES Essential Guide Educational philosophies are complex and wide-ranging.

While I am reading this book aloud, I will ask critical thinking questions, using the upper and lower end of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Some of the questions that I will ask are the following:

In “A Rounded Version: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences”, Howard Gardner illustrates how there are a variety of intelligences. Gardner starts off with an example how IQ tests may predict achievement in school but may not predict achievement in life. After finding out certain parts of the brain are responsible for certain functions, such as “Broca’s Area” which is responsible for sentence production, Gardner proposes the existence of multiple intelligences. Multiple studies later led him to propose seven distinct intelligences; Musical, bodily-kinesthetic, logical-mathematical, linguistic, spatial, interpersonal, and intrapersonal. Each intelligence has certain classifications. According to Gardner’s classifications, I realized my intelligences are bodily-kinesthetic, logical-mathematical, and intrapersonal.

Bloom’s Taxonomy is a classification of learning objectives in education that was developed by a committee of educators in the late 1940s to early 1950s. It shows us that lower level knowledge must be mastered

After discussing these thoughts with my father it also became obvious that educators are not to be blamed for the students who are left lacking with gaps in their knowledge. It is impossible for one teacher to give the needed individual attention to all the students in a class room. In addition smaller class sizes in most elementary and

Write one developmentally appropriate learning objective for the goal related to each level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.

In this book, Scout's maturity follows the concept of Bloom's Taxonomy, a multi-tiered model of conceptual thinking according to six levels of complexity (Forehand). Scout starts out using only the two bottom layers of this method, knowledge and observation, and comprehension, both which she has had since a very young age. Scout moves up a level in this system when she applies pre-known knowledge and analyzes situations. For instance, when Walter Cunningham would not take Miss Caroline's money, Scout realizes that Walter wouldn't take the money because he didn't want it, but instead, he wouldn't take it because he could never pay it back. Scout reaches the last two levels, synthesis and

Education in the United States has long been a concerned issue for teachers, parents, and communities. It is a major political topic, in which government has shown continuous efforts to compare and evaluate standards from state to state by creating and monitoring various programs for overall academic improvement across the country.

Each learning experience builds on the one prior to it as the students will gradually be introduced to the key vocabulary terms for this topic. Students will first use terms such as bigger or smaller quantity then continue onto learning the academic terms greater and less quantities; lastly, students will learn the mathematical symbols for the key vocabulary terms. Throughout the entirety of the learning experiences, students will use their prior knowledge from the other lesson in order to gain a deeper understanding of the current learning experience. The different levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy are implemented into the lessons as students will first learn to compare quantities, followed by comprehending the academic terms of greater, equal, and less, applying the terms to the symbols, and lastly, reaching the highest level of Bloom’s where students combine all learned information to compose their own problems. Students will be combatively assessed in order to conclude all the learning segments for this topic.]

Theory can inform and guide practice to allow individuals to strengthen and/or reinforce certain areas of study. With the case of high-stakes standardized tests, students are being taught at lower levels of cognition, thus impacting their cognitive development for application in furthering education and career readiness. Given that education plays a significant role in social status and economic prosperity, school should prepare students with skills to be able to prosper and become successful. This paper will discuss how Bloom’s Taxonomy can inform educational practice to enhance higher order cognition

“What any person in the world can learn almost all persons can learn if provided with appropriate prior and current conditions of learning” (Bloom, 2017). This belief was held by Dr. Bloom in 1956 when he and his team created Bloom’s Taxonomy. Since then educators have been utilizing these “goals of the learning process” (Clark, 2015) and making assumptions of its usage and implications. I too did have assumptions but have not thought about how I developed them or how they would affect my use of the taxonomy. When starting this reflection I held three assumptions true about Bloom’s Taxonomy. The first is if the educator uses Bloom’s Taxonomy for planning through assessment, then the student will develop higher order thinking skills. Secondly, a student can move on to a higher order thinking level only if they first mastered a lower order thinking level. Thirdly, if educations use different levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy in lessons students will retain more information. Interestingly, I uncovered two additional assumptions that I did not know I had. The first of which is that the focus on cognitive development of Bloom’s devalues importance of other domains. The other is that Bloom’s Taxonomy is used only by educators in K-12 and college. Here are some things I understand about this subject that informed or changed

Education is just one of the many academic cultures found within the social sciences. Education can be defined as a subject involving the use of studying and training to develop knowledge and skill. In the article, An Active Learning Approach to Bloom’s Taxonomy: 2 Games, 2 Classrooms, 2 Methods, author Fred Weigel and Mark Bonica explain that the study of cognitive learning, affective learning, and psychomotor learning are all associated with Bloom’s Taxonomy, an important tool used in education (21). Knowledge produced within this discipline is important because it explores how people learn and develop.

Bloom’s taxonomy can be used in the field of psychology to solve problems. Psychology focuses on the study of the mind and human behavior, using the taxonomy will serve as a tool for understanding cognition and thinking process. As a practitioner a common goal is to help others solve problems. The taxonomy will help me as a practitioner to analyze the problem with a client or student. The use of the taxonomy will help to promote new ideas and approaches through evaluation before making final decisions when helping clients. The taxonomy can help identify the needs of the client, ways to help the client, and what methods have and has not worked for the client as a practitioner in psychology. As a graduate learner in psychology, the taxonomy

Bloom’s Modified Taxonomy of Learning classification system is categorized into three domains: cognitive, psychomotor, and affective. (The Glossary of Education Reform, 2014). Bloom’s cognitive domain addresses thinking,

Bloom’s Taxonomy was created by Benjamin Bloom in 1956. Bloom identified that there were three categories of learning. Cognitive: Mental skills (knowledge) Affective: Growth in feelings or emotional areas (attitude) Psychomotor: Manual or physical skills (skills).