Hugo Chavez and Venezuela Essay

Chavez uses one of his rhetorical questions in paragraph 13, that states, “Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution?” Then he goes on to make a great point that “poor people” & “Workers” are affected by the violence. This helps him convince the reader by telling how people are being hurt by the violent structures of others making the reader feel like it’s “wrong” to have violent resistance, which is leaning the reader more towards an agreement with the writer.

Further on in the article, Chavez adds power to his contentions with implications. "The boycott, Gandhi taught, is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change." This implication to Gandhi, a notable and regarded advocate for serene resistance, adds validity to Chavez' contention by suggesting that Gandhi would have concurred with and bolstered Chavez' claims. Chavez increases on his believability by making a historical allusion soon after. "Examine history. Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution?

He goes on to say that the struggle is too extensive of a price to receive nothing from it. Chavez is

Although he acknowledges the frustration and anger people feel when they are “faced with seemingly insurmountable odds”, he emphasizes the need to have patience in order to achieve “justice for our people”, thus excluding those who wish to “espouse violence” onto the people. Chavez’s appeal to morality and powerful choice of words greatly promotes his cause meanwhile stigmatizing the usage of nonviolence and the suffering that comes along with it.

Simón Bolívar was said to be a revolutionary during the period of the early nineteenth century because he wanted to change Latin America. His goal was to promote change and gain independence for the Latin American states from Spanish rule, and

Here Chavez was introduced to the ideas of

“Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution? The poor, the workers”(Article). Cesar Chavez states this in his persuasive article fighting for nonviolent resistance rather than violence. There is a wrong and a right way to deal with people or laws one is against and that is what Chavez tries to convey in this article. He uses different strategies to try to convince the readers that violence is not acceptable, and there are better ways to handle anger.

Throughout the history of the world, imperialism has played a major role. Imperialism is one country’s complete domination of the political, economic, and social life of another country. Imperialism has many positive and negative effects. The Age of Imperialism is considered 1800 - 1914. During this time Europe became a major world leader. European countries set up colonies all over Africa, Latin America, and Asia, and encouraged their citizens to populate them. European imperialism boosted Europe’s economy, and made them a world power. Imperialization had an entirely different effect on Africa, Latin America, and Asia. People of these countries were mistreated, they lost their culture, land, and self respect. The negative effects of

Chavez encountered many obstacles after the formation of his union and at the beginning of their strike. Aside from the fact that many of the workers were hesitant to join Chavez and go against

Also as said in here, these are most of the reasons why Chavez had to do something about their lives. Chavez fought for better rights for his fellow

When faced with the option of obeying the laws of her society or honoring her brother Polynices’ death, Antigone’s choice was a difficult one. In the play Antigone, written by Sophocles, there is a feud between choosing to do the right and wrong thing. On one hand, moral beliefs pull Antigone closer to disobeying law. On the other hand, fear of disrespecting what is left of her family keeps her on the edge of making a decision. Her uncle Creon, also known as the King of Thebes, believes that Polynices betrayed the country and does not deserve a proper burial, but the controversy ultimately leads to Antigone going against the law, fulfilling her moral compass. This however can be questioned by her act of suicide during the end of the play. Antigone’s choice to bury her brother has moral worth because of her religious and self beliefs, she did the right thing for the right

One of the first countries to achieve independence in Latin America was Haiti. Haiti gained its independence from France in 1804. Haiti's

In another case, “however important the struggle is and however much misery, poverty and exploitation exists, we know that it cannot be more important than a human life” which also shows Chavez’ familiarity to the emotions of his audience frequently experience (37-39). He brings up a moral factor as people are starting to consider harmful tactics. He is well aware of how hatred can lead to harmful effects, and he reminds his audience that it would be immoral to potentially take the life of a human being just because they are frustrated with the injustice system. Chavez is only trying to ease his audience because he is familiar that there is a widespread feeling of impatience and anger.

By doing this, he reinforces the messages that Martin Luther King Jr. passed down with the civil rights movement. King’s and Chavez’s effects on their respective movements still ring true today, with protests from oppressed minority groups actually creating change in the topics that they are protesting against. An example of this is the Black Lives Matter movement, where people of all races protest the disproportionate killings of African-Americans by police officers. These two figureheads are truly the most influential people involved in the civil rights

With the huge glut in old prices that began in 2014/15, the Venezuelan economy took a complete nosedive.