Human Nature : What Makes A Human Person?

I think the author thinks that human nature is basically “good” meaning cooperative and constructive because human beings are good. There is an understanding that the environment you grow up in shapes part of you as a human being and it can also shape if you are a good or bad person. Human nature can affect human beings.

Human nature is the characteristics, feelings and behavioral traits of humankind. Humans are capable of expressing different kinds of emotions such as joy, frustration, despair, remorse, and other forms of emotions depending on the situations they are encountering. In the film ‘Minority Report’, various kinds of human characteristics have been portrayed. The view of human nature posited in this film is assuming that all humankind is likely to commit crimes regardless of their position.

For as long as humans have been on this earth, our nature as human beings has been altered for the adoption of our environments. Human nature is what separates individuals from others. This has been shaping the choices we make, simply because human nature is an important part of everyday life. Although traits help us separate who we are as humans, our nature is what affects the choices we make.

Human nature can be defined as characteristics, feelings, or traits that of all humans share. Human characteristics and traits can differ from personal cultural background and or by the community that you are surrounded in. The significance of your community and culture is that it can be of importance since it could affect you negatively or positively. Human nature is by origin naturally good but is corrupted gradually or abruptly by the community or religion. Individuals from society and society itself can immensely make an impact on people.

In Genesis the word of God leads humanity in the direction of self preservation, urging them to procreate, to ”Be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 9:1), and to minimize hostility and violence among people. As Freud asserted, “Besides the instinct to preserve living substance and join it into ever larger units, there must exist another, contrary instinct seeking to dissolve those units and bring them back to their primeval, inorganic state” (Freud 77). Genesis exemplifies the struggle between the two opposing human instincts, with God acting as a moderator between them. Forms of justice are put into place in an attempt to control these drives, one example being the proclamation that “Whoever sheds the blood of a human, by a human shall that person’s blood be shed” (Genesis 9:6). The ethics and laws that develop throughout Genesis seek to “prevent the crudest excesses of brutal violence” but are unable to control “the more cautious and refined manifestations of human aggressiveness” (Freud 70). Since they cannot be completely eradicated, the scriptures instead play into the more negative aspects of human nature, especially narcissism, and manipulate them into a force for conservation rather than annihilation.

Through the Hsun Tzu’s opinion, he put forward the “man’s nature is evil”. In the article, he said: “Man’s nature is evil; goodness is the result of conscious activity”. It means human’s nature is bad, incomplete and weak, and we burn with the “fondness for profit”, but the issue decided the people become bad or good, it is if we follow our nature or we change it and learn to be better.

Some may say that human nature is just instinct ,but according to dictionary.com human nature is the psychological and social qualities that characterize humankind, especially in contrast with other living things. In a society you need three of the many things to make it well functioning. Those three things are law, effective communication and respect. The reason for this is because in a society law is needed to let people know what they are not aloud to do and it keeps you in check and from having everyone do what they want without consequence. As well as effective communication because that way everyone knows each others point of views and way of thinking.

Human Nature is a very interesting topic with it being something that is in everyday life. Every decision you make comes with some influence from Human Nature. Human Nature tells you a bit of right from wrong and almost tells you what outcomes can be. To give an example from Paul Zak’s “Can a molecule make us moral” article they did an experiment where two people would be in separate rooms and they would both get twenty dollars. One person could choose how much money they wanted to give the other. So basically if you didn’t give the other person money they could take money away. But if you did they could give you money so in the end you have more than what you started with. “ The DM1 to DM2 transfer is understood to be a measure of trust,

1. The belief that most people were good and that when they did wrong they were displaying weaknesses of character not a sinful nature. A person’s character was determined by his environment; therefore, improving his social conditions would improve his character.

Many things may come to mind when people think about man and mankind. There are very many conflicting ideas about what it means and how it is perceived. Everyone has their own opinion, but one is made clear between a man named Tom and a man named Wilson. In the book “The Great Gatsby,” Fitzgerald makes a very bold statement about the nature of man, this statement is that the nature of man is the same even with competing differences within the situations.

In the short story “The Child by Tiger” the author addresses a lot of bad things people do due to human nature. Human nature is everything that humans do that is considered natural. An example of human nature would be being naturally curious. Human nature is not inherently good or bad; however, it can lead to people doing things they may regret. “The Child by Tiger” does a wonderful job showing off these instances.

individual experiences and environment in our own lifetime but also by what happened to our

What is it that makes us who we are? Is it how we were raised? Is it the specific time and location in space during our birth? Or is it by mere choice alone in every moment that makes us who we are at that moment, ever-changing? I could tell you that they are all are true. And I could also tell you that they are all false. And guess what, both statements would be correct. Here’s another shocker, truth is relative. You can turn something from an untruth into a truth and vise versa all with the power of belief, thought, and faith. If you truly believe with all of your heart that you are a product of your upbringing and nothing more, then you have made that true. You’ve also chosen to be a victim of your past but hey if that’s the truth you want you got it. Now if you believe that your upbringing is the past and nothing more, and that you choose moment by moment who you are, then that is true. Truth is based on your reality. And your reality is based on your thoughts and beliefs. There is no set reality. There are no set truths. Reality, just like truth, is relative to the being who perceives it. Now personally I have chosen not to be a victim of my past for that is all that it is, the past. And the past, just like the future, exists only in our minds. Without your mind, without you remembering the past or dreaming of future possibilities, there is no past and there is no future. There is only NOW. The universe has no concept of past or future. It only

People always wonder what makes them who they are. However, the extent to which our characters are derived from ourselves is always an argument for many philosophers. Marx, a German philosopher, and Mengzi, a representative thinker of Confucianism, present similar accounts in explaining how humans are shaped. Both Marx and Mengzi believe that our individual character is not solely shaped by ourselves but are shaped in ways by external forces. However, I will argue that, compared with Mengzi’s view of the moral attributes that inherently exist in humans themselves, Marx’s account is more systematic and compelling due to his emphasis of the effect of the interrelationship between humans themselves and the external forces of labor and social structures.

Human nature is the idea of how humans act and behave in the state of human nature. Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and Michel de Montaigne both have different ideas of what human nature is. Pico believes that the state of human nature is based on what is within the person, such as their morals and how they treat themselves intellectually, and how they treat their body. Montaigne believes that the state of human nature should not be based on where people live but their way of life. Human nature is best represented by what is within a person rather than having an environment represents a person because looks can be deceiving.