Idea Of Justice

People see distributive justice through different views. The distribution of goods (or attention, praise, etc.) is analyzed in different ways by different people. There are three principles of distributive justice, these principles are equity, equality and need. Equity pertains to people getting goods or rewards in direct relation to the work they put in or what is perceived to be of greater importance. For example, a star player in the pro-league may deserve higher pay then his/her teammate who warms the bench. Though the two earn different amounts of salary, there is distributive justice (equity) in that they are being fairly paid in correspondence to their contributions to the team. Equality on the other hand, means equal rewards for everyone

Justice is a moral as well as a political concept. The meaning of Justice varies from one political thinker to another. The Oxford English Dictionary defines a “just” person as one who typically “does what is morally right” and is disposed to “giving everyone his or her due.” Philosophers, both modern and medieval, went beyond etymology and dictionary meanings to understand the right meaning of justice. The nature of justice as both a moral virtue of character and a desirable quality of political society, as well as how it applies to ethical and social decision-making were the most important topics that were studied by the philosophers. Most of the philosophers had their own theories of justice on various social issues such as civil disobedience, punishment, equal opportunity for women, slavery, war, property rights, and international relations. According to Plato, justice is

The Eighth Amendment ratified in 1791, and it had three clauses. The clauses are Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Excessive Fines, and Excessive bail. The Cruel and Unusual Punishment means that the state and federal government restrict how extreme the punishment is to a person who has done a crime. This clause is made so that the people that are accused are not tortured and killed cruelly. The Excessive Fines restrict the state and federal government the amount of money a person fined for a crime. This clause created was so that the government cannot take a lot of your money away. The Excessive bail means that courts can’t give a tremendous amount of bond to a person who has broken the law. This clause created so that the judge and jury cannot already make their decision before the case even begins. This is why the saying “an accused is presumed innocent until found guilty” is established.

The preamble can be broken down into many important phrases, each of them is important to understand the purpose of the United States constitution. The opening phrase of the preamble “We the people of the United States, in order to form a form or more perfect union” portrays the idea that even though the constitution was written up by some of the most well-educated men of the new country, the rights given under the document were given to all American citizens. The previous government was based on the articles of confederation, which were limited. When the framers of the constitution wrote this phrase, they felt they were making a new government where there was no place for the king; hence this form of government had to be a better job governing a country. Later on, the preamble pretends to establish justice and domestic tranquility. Making sure to establish justice under the constitution was important for the American system, since this was one of the main reasons why the Americans revolted against England was injustice. Insuring domestic tranquility was one of the main reasons why the constitutional convention was held,

The Preamble; a profound one sentence prelude to the Constitution. It states the purpose and gives outlook to why the constitution was established and its intent. The Preamble comprises of bold words and phrases that highlight key points to the meaning of the document. It summarizes six different goals or reasons to what the constitution plans to uphold. Those six goals, were intended to creat greatness to the country and show what the United states would stand for, life and pursuit to happiness.

The Preamble to the Constitution is important because it gives us freedom and security from infringement on these rights. It talks about our goal to form a “more perfect Union” and establishes the Constitution. The goal is to bring justice to those who have been awaiting it. Justice means to bring to the surface what matters and to make it right. This will help to make us into that union or unit of people. To unite us and make us one nation. By uniting the people you are making the nation stronger and more prepared to face situations.

A preamble is an important statement for justification stating it's purpose for a deed. A lot of Preambles are considered unimportant however the Preamble to the Constitution is considered very important because was placed on the last few days of the constitutional convention and it referred to the various states. It has the famous line "We the People" in it. The Constitution is legal only in the U.S.A, and has been around for a long time. All 9 states approved it. The author's motivation was used for this.

In this essay, we will be exploring the idea of democracy in relation to John Rawls’ and Robert Nozick’s conceptions of justice. We will begin by evaluating what each intellectual has written in relation to democracy and then compare the structure of their arguments for their conceptions of justice.

It is also called the ‘simultaneously fair treatment of individuals in a given situation, with the result that everybody gets what they deserve’. So ‘fair’ point out that people receive what they deserve, whereas ‘equal’ point out that everyone gets the same share of social capital and benefits. In other words, fairness demonstrates that all members receive an equal opportunity of social benefits. The concept of justice results on whether it refers to processes or outcomes. The procedural justice (known as the former) shed lights on how rules and laws function and how members are equally treated by those rules (degree of fairness). Moreover, there are 3 types of justice framework judging the fairness for various situations: the distributive, procedural and retributive justice. First, the distributive justice- fairness in dividing the outcomes or results or resources. For example, salary of employees depending on their sector in business such as: their skills. Second, the procedural justice- the fairness of decisions made, for example: human rights. Finally, the retributive justice- it is the fairness in fixing the wrongs, for example: punishments or

To live in a place, where equality, peace, security and dignity are guaranteed is a good fortune to those who found a just society. Though it is not an easy task to establish a just society, but it is not an impossible idea. A just society requires a society of law abiding citizens who work together for the betterment of the society, where laws are human rights informed and social policies are effective.

So the Preamble is like really important and it is confusing so I thought I would sum it up for you.It is to make our country better we must decide what's right and wrong and punish those who are guilty, keep our country peaceful, build a military that can defend the country, try to make people's lives better, and keep everyone free. That is our plan contained in this Constitution of the United States of America.That was a summery of what the preamble is about.A longer summery of it is it simply states that the Constitution establishes the legal foundation for the central government of states that make up the United States. It allows for a legal system, military defense, basic services to ensure the welfare of the people like transportation

Pro makes three arguments, well really two arguments as to why he thinks we ought to prefer morality over justice.

According to the Free Online English Dictionary, justice said to be “the quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness: to uphold the justice of a cause”. “Equitableness” has to do with treatment of fairness that brings about just behavior which fairness also recognized. “Fairness” suggests equal treatment in a proper legal matter, or how something will be handled. When comparing equitableness and fair, they both mean the same exact thing which is just fair and equal treatment that implies reasonable and unbiased in both parts of the meanings. The words come hand in hand by suggesting that equality in which individuals are treated the same in a positive manner resulting in a win-win

Many people immigrate to the United States seeking new opportunities and a better lives as a citizen. Everyday citizens never think to question the validity of the pledge of allegiance, in particular the section that states "For liberty and justice for all". Does the United States government abide by this pledge and give every citizen, including the lawbreakers, justice? In my opinion, I do not believe that every citizen is given a fair trial under the current drug laws created by the government, which results in a higher rate of unreasonable prison sentencing.

My idea of justice has evolved in nuanced ways in which I did not predict at the onset of this course. I have held consistent the idea of creating a more equal world as a key element of justice. However, I have added important nuances in the way in which I think about and discuss this issue. I discussed equality in my initial definition of justice. This sense of equality has developed to include non-human animals and even matter into this conversation. Through Bennett I have embraced the idea of flattening out the current human-on-top hierarchy by elevating non-human animals and matter to a similar plane as humans. In my definition of justice currently, I include not only obvious human issues but also issues of matter and animals. This being said, it is integral to clarify that the major crises that are present in our world cannot be categorized as solei ‘human’, ‘animal’ or ‘matter’ issues. What effects one, effects all. No individual node can be separated from the assemblage that not only influences, but comprises it.