In today’s medical society, advancements are constantly being made to improve patient outcomes and promote higher hospital satisfaction. With as much progress that has been made, there are critical errors that can still be found in the medical field that, in turn, cause the lack of reimbursement to a hospital. Through thorough research and evidence based practice, hospitals are able to follow guidelines to prevent issues such as: patient falls, hospital acquired pressure ulcers, catheter associated urinary tract infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and many more. As prevention for multiple poor patient outcomes, quality improvement studies can be implemented to promote the wellbeing of the patient during the hospital stay, improve …show more content…
Pressure ulcers are staged rated on severity (stage I- stage IV, stage IV including damage to muscle and possibly joints). The deeper and more severe the pressure ulcer is, the more difficult treating the ulcer can be, costing the hospital more money per patient case. In one study, conducted in the United States, it was found that treatment may cost up to seventy thousand dollars per pressure ulcer in the hospital setting and up to eleven billion dollars annually (Damask, K. 2015). According to the article Drugs & Aging, many patients with severe ulcers, such as a stage three or four, develop chronic wounds that may even result in death as a complication (Jaul, E. 2010). Prevention is the key in regard to pressure ulcers. Therefore, quality improvement research can improve hospital protocols, which may/may not be in place related to pressure ulcers, and improve patient outcomes.
After considering the multitude of characteristics of the assigned unit, a root cause analysis was completed to determine how “at risk” the hospital would be for acquiring another patient pressure ulcer. Root causes analyses are effective in “provid[ing] a tool to identify all the possible causes of the problem not just the obvious ones” which allows for “possible solutions that might not have been previously considered” (Phillips, Simmonds 2013).
The
The authors were concerned with health-related quality of life (HRQL) and how pressure ulcers impact the patient's subjective experience of care, because overall health care outcomes may be influenced by the interaction between disease burden and patient compliance. Thirty adult patients in hospital, rehabilitation, or community care in England and Ireland were recruited for the study. Inclusion in the study required being under the care of a tissue viability nurse.
Pressure ulcers are areas of localised damage to the skin and underlying tissue caused by pressure. (Stechmiller et al., 2008) Pressure ulcers still one of the most significant health problem in our hospitals today, It affects on patients quality of life patient self-image and how long they will stay in hospital then the cost of patient treatment . Moore (2005) estimate that it costs a quarter of a million euro’s per annum to manage pressure ulcers in hospital and community settings across Ireland .which allows one to take immediate actions and prevent the ulcer if possible. To support pressure ulcer risk assessment several standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment scales have been introduced
To start the search for evidence within University Hospital, questions were asked in regards to pressure ulcers. Monthly updates are often sent out via email from the wound care team to keep everyone up to date on knowledge. While there was informative numbers within those updates, this information falls short according to Moore, Webster, & Samuriwo (2015). The main limitation of the study is the lack of a control group in pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. There is no clarity in the specific criterion that contributed to improved clinical outcomes. Teams used more than one method in the research project. Also, there is no study that meant the inclusion criteria in the random clinical trials. The lack of standardized
Keywords: The Joint Commission, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, The American Nurses Association, Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting,
Pressure ulcer is an adverse outcome in the clinical care setting that also linked to poor quality of nursing care. Though pressure should never happen in a professional care setting, it is still prevalent throughout the world’s medical settings. This article looks at many other previous studies from 1992 to present to compare and find the underlying issues that may contribute to pressure ulcer. A closer look at the nurse’s knowledge versus actual decision will be observe, because it is the key factor in pressure ulcer prevention.
The worse possible outcome of a pressure ulcer is death, with an approximation of 60,000 patients dying each year as a direct result of a pressure ulcer (Stotts & Gunningberg, 2007). This is significant to nursing practice because if we can prevent more pressure ulcers from occurring, we can dramatically improve patient outcomes, patient family and satisfaction, and even prevent the death of a loved one.
Although the situation was quite challenging, it provided me with some useful experiences for the future practice. I understand that all institutions should have a policy for documenting the assessment of patients, including pressure ulcers (Morison 2001). I have come to be familiar with the homes assessment policy using the Sterling Pressure Sore Severity Scale and most importantly I have learned that by using a universal assessment tool it supports a systemic and consistent approach to pressure ulcer evaluation. This therefore supporting continuity of care.
Nursing sensitive indicators reflect the structure, process and outcomes of nursing care. The structure of nursing care is indicated by many factors such as supply of staff, education level and quality of care provided. Process indicators measure aspects of nursing care such as assessment, intervention, and RN job satisfaction. Patient outcomes that are determined to be nursing sensitive are those that improve if there is a greater quantity or quality of nursing care (Nursing world, 2013). In 1999, the American Nursing Association recognized a total of 10 indicators that apply to hospital based nursing care (Americansentinel.edu, 2017). Indicator such as pressure ulcers, patient falls and nosocomial infections are recognized in this list and are considered preventable with proper nursing action. Knowledge of these indicators could have assisted the nurses in several ways involving this case study involving Mr. J.
Pressure ulcers are one of the most common problems health care facilities often face which causes pain and discomfort for the patient, cost effective to manage and impacts negatively on the hospital (Pieper, Langemo, & Cuddigan, 2009; Padula et al., 2011). The development of pressure ulcers occur when there is injury to the skin or tissue usually over bony prominences such as the coccyx, sacrum or heels from the increase of pressure and shear. This injury will compromise blood flow and result in ischemia due to lack of oxygen being delivered (Gyawali et al., 2011). Patients such as those who are critically ill or bed bounded are at high risk of developing pressure ulcers (O'Brien et
Evidence suggests that pressure ulcers greatly increase mortality rates in both hospitals and nursing homes (Thomas, 2001). Patients who develop a pressure ulcer within six weeks of admission to an acute-care facility are three times more likely to die than patients who do not develop pressure ulcers (Thomas, 2001). Moreover, patients who develop a pressure ulcer within three months of admission to a long-term care facility are associated with a 92% mortality rate compared with a 4% mortality rate for patients who do not develop them (Thomas, 2001). This evidence alone shows how significant this problem is to the overall health status of patients. In my personal nursing experience, I have heard many complaints voiced from patients and their family members concerning the development of new pressure ulcers. Patients and family members have expressed dissatisfaction because of the increased stress and prolonged hospital stay often associated with the treatment of pressure ulcers.
Fortunately, according to Chan et al., (2008), 95% of pressure ulcers can be prevented and nursing care is believed to be a primary method of preventing pressure ulcer development. Research was conducted on accredited search databases such as CINAHL, Nursing Resource Center and OvidSP on prevention measures for pressure ulcers. A number of credible evidence based research was found that supported the nursing intervention of
The INTACT trial showed a significant reduction in pressure ulcers (PU) incidence in the intervention group at the hospital (cluster) level, but this difference was not significant at the
Pressure ulcers are a problem and can lead to poor patient outcomes as well as hospital fines. Evidence based studies have shown that “the average cost of care in an acute care hospital for a patient with a stage III or stage IV pressure ulcer reported by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is $43,180” (Jackson, 2008). Pressure ulcers and other skin breakdowns are among the most significant adverse events causing distress for patients and their care givers and compromising patients’ recovery from illness or injury (Gardiner, 2008). It is the tasks of nurses to ensure prevention of these complications is part of the daily care regimen.
Despite advancement of technology, pressure ulcer continues to be a primordial in the health care system. Prevention of pressure ulcer remains an important issue in the health care facility. The critically ill ICU patient is the main target of this disease. Prevention remains the key for this problem. Some facility have standard policy for the eradication of pressure ulcer However the question is will the sacrum pressure ulcer formation be reduced in adult critically ill clients
Patients get a pressure ulcer for a legion of rationalities. According to Alene Burke of Nursing Assistant Education, some of the elements why people get them which she cited from Nettina, S. (2009), are old age, deficient mobility, lack of moisture, and insufficient diet. Moreover, factors like neurological and other physical problems, friction and shearing, bed and chairs with wrinkled linens or hard objects and pressure ulcers in the past may similarly predispose pressure ulcer. This observations implies that in nursing care pressure ulcers are prospected as negligence, however it is arrogated that pressure ulcers are avoidable on the condition that prime level of care is continuously rendered to patients and residents. (Burke 2010).